Soil erosion assessment tools from point to regional scales—the role of geomorphologists in land management research and implementation

Geomorphological research has played an important role in the development and implementation of soil erosion assessment tools. Because policy and management approaches include the use of soil erosion assessment tools, soil erosion research directly affects the public in terms of providing information on natural hazards and human impacts, and also as the basis for regulatory policy on land management. For example, soil loss calculations and geomorphological expertise are used to support soil conservation planning, both through agricultural legislation that defines maximum tolerable soil loss rates, and through federal and local legislation that requires soil erosion controls on many construction sites. To be useful for decision makers, soil erosion models must have simple data requirements, must consider spatial and temporal variability in hydrological and soil erosion processes, and must be applicable to a variety of regions with minimum calibration. The growing use of erosion models and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) in local to regional scale soil and water conservation raises concerns about how models are used. This has prompted interest in methods to assess how models function at management scales and with the types of data that are commonly available to users. A case study of a GIS-based soil erosion assessment tool using the process-based Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP) shows that using commonly available data rather than research grade data can have (predictably) a significant impact on model results. If model results are then used in management decisions, it is critical to assess whether the scale and direction of variation in results will affect management and policy decisions. Geomorphologists provide unique perspectives on soil erosion and can continue to affect policy through soil erosion research. This research should focus on fundamental processes, but equally important is continued development and evaluation of models that are matched to real world data availability, geomorphic settings, and information needs. D 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

[1]  A. W. Zingg,et al.  Degree and length of land slope as it affects soil loss in run-off. , 1940 .

[2]  D. Smith,et al.  Estimating Soil Losses from Field Areas of Claypan Soil , 1948 .

[3]  J. Boardman,et al.  Frequency-magnitude distributionsfor soil erosion, runoff and rainfall - a comparative analysis , 1999 .

[4]  G. R. Foster,et al.  Predicting soil erosion by water : a guide to conservation planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) , 1997 .

[5]  Chris S. Renschler,et al.  Evaluating spatial and temporal variability in soil erosion risk—rainfall erosivity and soil loss ratios in Andalusia, Spain , 1999 .

[6]  J. M. Eilers,et al.  A Quantitative Method for Delineating Regions: An Example for the Western Corn Belt Plains Ecoregion of the USA , 1997, Environmental management.

[7]  K. Nordstrom,et al.  Geomorphology and natural hazards , 1994 .

[8]  David Favis-Mortlock,et al.  Modelling Soil Erosion by Water , 1998 .

[9]  Gerard Govers,et al.  Statistical distributions of soil loss from runoff plots and WEPP model simulations , 1998 .

[10]  J. Poesen,et al.  Water erosion monitoring and experimentation for global change studies , 1996 .

[11]  Lloyd Darrell Norton,et al.  Landscape position, surface hydraulic gradients and erosion processes , 1998 .

[12]  J. V. Bonta.  Spatial variability of runoff and soil properties on small watersheds in similar soil-map units , 1998 .

[13]  D. L. Schertz,et al.  The basis for soil loss tolerances , 1983 .

[14]  James A. Lewis,et al.  The dynamics of soil erosion in US agriculture , 1998 .

[15]  Trimble,et al.  Decreased rates of alluvial sediment storage in the coon creek basin, wisconsin, 1975-93 , 1999, Science.

[16]  Mike Kirkby,et al.  Modelling Across Scales: The Medalus Family of Models , 1998 .

[17]  D. Pimentel,et al.  Environmental and Economic Costs of Soil Erosion and Conservation Benefits , 1995, Science.

[18]  Field-scale watershed evaluations on deep-loess soils: II. Hydrologic responses to different agricultural land management systems , 1999 .

[19]  H. H. Bennett,et al.  Soil Erosion A National Menace , 1928, Environmental Geomorphology and Landscape Conservation.

[20]  Leonard C. Johnson,et al.  Soil loss tolerance: Fact or myth? , 1987 .

[21]  W. H. Wischmeier,et al.  Rainfall energy and its relationship to soil loss , 1958 .

[22]  W. R. Osterkamp,et al.  The applicability of RUSLE to geomorphic studies , 1995 .

[23]  James Glanz.  Saving Our Soil: Solutions for Sustaining Earth's Vital Resource , 1995 .

[24]  Paul G. Risser,et al.  The Human Impact on the Natural Environment , 2018 .

[25]  A. C. Imeson,et al.  Spatial and short-term temporal variations in runoff, soil aggregation and other soil properties along a Mediterranean Climatological Gradient , 1998 .

[26]  Jon Harbor,et al.  Engineering geomorphology at the cutting edge of land disturbance: erosion and sediment control on construction sites , 1999 .

[27]  R. Young,et al.  AGNPS: A nonpoint-source pollution model for evaluating agricultural watersheds , 1989 .

[28]  J. Boardman.  An average soil erosion rate for Europe: Myth or reality? , 1998 .

[29]  W. H. Wischmeier.  Use and misuse of the universal soil loss equation. , 1976 .

[30]  G. R. Foster,et al.  RUSLE: Revised universal soil loss equation , 1991 .

[31]  W. G. Knisel,et al.  GLEAMS: Groundwater Loading Effects of Agricultural Management Systems , 1987 .

[32]  William H. Allen,et al.  The Great Flood of 1993Animals and plants of the floodplain thrive, while river researchers have a field day , 1993 .

[33]  James C. Ascough,et al.  THE WEPP WATERSHED MODEL: III. COMPARISONS TO MEASURED DATA FROM SMALL WATERSHEDS , 1997 .

[34]  F. R. Troeh,et al.  Soil and Water Conservation for Productivity and Environmental Protection , 1981 .

[35]  Gary J. Hunter,et al.  New Tools For Handling Spatial Data Quality : Moving from Academic Concepts to Practical Reality , 1999 .

[36]  G. R. Foster,et al.  WEPP: A new generation of erosion prediction technology , 1991 .

[37]  W. H. Wischmeier,et al.  Predicting rainfall-erosion losses from cropland east of the Rocky Mountains , 1965 .

[38]  W. H. Wischmeier,et al.  Predicting rainfall erosion losses : a guide to conservation planning , 1978 .

[39]  Dennis C. Flanagan,et al.  Assessing water erosion in small watersheds using WEPP with GIS and digital elevation models , 1999 .

[40]  Mark A. Nearing,et al.  Evaluating soil erosion models using measured plot data: accounting for variability in the data , 2000 .

[41]  D. L. Peck,et al.  Soil conservation and the reduction of erosion and sedimentation in the Coon Creek basin, Wisconsin , 1982 .

[42]  Daniel C. Yoder,et al.  RUSLE revisited: Status, questions, answers, and the future , 1994 .

[43]  L. J. Hagen,et al.  A wind erosion prediction system to meet user needs , 1991 .

[44]  Mark A. Nearing,et al.  Variability in Soil Erosion Data from Replicated Plots , 1999 .

[45]  K. C. McGregor,et al.  Evaluation of WEPP Runoff And Soil Loss Predictions Using Natural Runoff Plot Data , 1996 .

[46]  W. G. Knisel,et al.  CREAMS: a field scale model for Chemicals, Runoff, and Erosion from Agricultural Management Systems [USA] , 1980 .

[47]  J. Boardman.  Modelling Soil Erosion in Real Landscapes: A Western European Perspective , 1998 .

[48]  E. E. Alberts,et al.  Variability of Runoff and Soil Loss from Fallow Experimental Plots , 1986 .

[49]  David Favis-Mortlock.  Validation of Field-Scale Soil Erosion Models Using Common Datasets , 1998 .

[50]  G. R. Foster,et al.  A Process-Based Soil Erosion Model for USDA-Water Erosion Prediction Project Technology , 1989 .

[51]  D. Walling,et al.  Rates and patterns of tillage and water erosion on terraces and contour strips: evidence from caesium-137 measurements , 1999 .

[52]  M. Turner,et al.  LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY : The Effect of Pattern on Process 1 , 2002 .

[53]  G. Hunter,et al.  A Risk-Based Approach to Assessing the ‘ Fitness for Use ’ of Spatial Data , 1999 .

[54]  R. Abrahart,et al.  MEDALUS soil erosion models for global change , 1998 .

[55]  W. R. Osterkamp,et al.  Geomorphic considerations for erosion prediction , 1997 .

[56]  James C. Ascough,et al.  The WEPP watershed model : I. Hydrology and erosion , 1997 .

[57]  F. Agus,et al.  The economics of soil degradation: from national policy to farmers' fields. , 1998 .

[58]  Gerard Govers,et al.  The European soil erosion model (EUROSEM): documentation and user guide. , 1998 .

[59]  Daniel C. Yoder,et al.  The future of RUSLE: Inside the new Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation , 1995 .

[60]  Mark A. Nearing,et al.  Impact of Cligen Parameters on Wepp-predicted Average Annual Soil Loss , 1996 .

[61]  John N. Quinton,et al.  The GCTE validation of soil erosion models for global change studies. , 1996 .

[62]  Alicia L. Carriquiry,et al.  Sampling Schemes for Policy Analyses Using Computer Simulation Experiments , 1998, Environmental management.

[63]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  Visualizing spatial data uncertainty using animation , 1997 .