Loss Aversion Motivates Tax Sheltering: Evidence from U.S. Tax Returns

This paper presents evidence that loss aversion affects taxpayers as they file their annual tax returns. I model the decisions of a loss-averse tax filer who may use tax shelters to manipulate the "balance due" exchanged with the IRS. I use this model to derive distinguishing predictions of loss aversion which facilitate its identification and quantification in the field. Under loss framing, the discretely steeper marginal utility of a dollar motivates greater pursuit of shelters. These motives imply that the post-sheltering distribution of balance due will exhibit a structural shift in the loss domain, due to discretely higher sheltering in this region. Furthermore, the discontinuity in marginal incentives generates excess mass, or "bunching," at the gain/loss threshold. Using the 1979-1990 IRS Panel of Individual Returns, I document the predicted bunching and shifting in the distribution of balance due, and examine the causes and correlates of these features. The observed distribution is consistent with the framing of tax payments as losses and tax refunds as gains, and is difficult to rationalize with plausible alternative theories. Using two complementary structural approaches — identified from the bunching and shifting predictions, respectively — I estimate substantial potential policy impact of this psychological bias. These results have direct implications for tax policy and public finance.

[1]  J. List,et al.  The Behavioralist as Tax Collector: Using Natural Field Experiments to Enhance Tax Compliance , 2017 .

[2]  Youssef Benzarti How Taxing Is Tax Filing? Leaving Money on the Table Because of Hassle Costs , 2015 .

[3]  Ali al-Nowaihi,et al.  Why do people pay taxes? Prospect theory versus expected utility theory , 2007 .

[4]  R. Thaler,et al.  Labor Supply of New York City Cabdrivers: One Day at a Time , 1997 .

[5]  J. Slemrod,et al.  Estimating Tax Noncompliance With Evidence from Unaudited Tax Returns , 2007 .

[6]  Otto H. Chang,et al.  Taxpayer attitudes toward tax audit risk. , 1987 .

[7]  Juanjuan Meng,et al.  research platform to scholars worldwide. New York City Cabdrivers ’ Labor Supply Revisited: Reference-Dependent Preferences with Rational-Expectations Targets for Hours and Income , 2008 .

[8]  Naomi E. Feldman,et al.  Mental Accounting Effects of Income Tax Shifting , 2010, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[9]  A. Persson,et al.  Loss evasion and tax aversion , 2015 .

[10]  N. Barberis Thirty Years of Prospect Theory in Economics: A Review and Assessment , 2012 .

[11]  Johannes F. Schmieder,et al.  Reference-Dependent Job Search: Evidence from Hungary , 2016 .

[12]  Keith M. Marzilli Ericson,et al.  Expectations as Endowments: Evidence on Reference-Dependent Preferences from Exchange and Valuation Experiments , 2010 .

[13]  David Genesove,et al.  Loss Aversion and Seller Behaviour: Evidence from the Housing Market , 2001 .

[14]  Andrew D. Cuccia,et al.  Multiple Determinants of Framing Referents in Tax Reporting and Compliance , 2002 .

[15]  A. Schepanski,et al.  A Prospect Theory Account of the Income Tax Withholding Phenomenon , 1995 .

[16]  Emmanuel Saez,et al.  Do Taxpayers Bunch at Kink Points? , 1999 .

[17]  New York City Cabdrivers’ Labor Supply Revisited: Reference-Dependent Preferences with Rational-Expectations Targets for Hours and Income , 2010 .

[18]  Youssef Benzarti How Taxing Is Tax Filing ? Leaving Money on the Table Because of Compliance Costs , 2015 .

[19]  J. Andreoni IRS as loan shark tax compliance with borrowing constraints , 1992 .

[20]  B. Erard Taxation with representation: An analysis of the role of tax practitioners in tax compliance , 1993 .

[21]  Ali al-Nowaihi,et al.  Optimal Income Taxation in the Presence of Tax Evasion: Expected Utility Versus Prospect Theory , 2007 .

[22]  A. Persson,et al.  Tax compliance and loss aversion * , 2013 .

[23]  D. Feenberg,et al.  Sources of IRA Saving , 1989, Tax Policy and the Economy.

[24]  J. List,et al.  Is the Endowment Effect an Expectations Effect , 2014 .

[25]  Alberto Zanardi,et al.  Tax Evasion, Tax Rates, and Reference Dependence , 2004 .

[26]  Devin G. Pope,et al.  Is Tiger Woods Loss Averse? Persistent Bias in the Face of Experience, Competition, and High Stakes , 2009 .

[27]  Erzo F. P. Luttmer,et al.  Tax Morale , 2014, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[28]  Henk Elffers,et al.  Influencing the prospects of tax evasion , 1997 .

[29]  P. Webley,et al.  Decision frames, opportunity and tax evasion: An experimental approach , 1990 .

[30]  David Huffman,et al.  Reference Points and Effort Provision , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[31]  Gideon Yaniv,et al.  Tax Compliance and Advance Tax Payments: A Prospect Theory Analysis , 1999, National Tax Journal.

[32]  Charles T. Clotfelter,et al.  Tax Evasion and Tax Rates: An Analysis of Individual Returns , 1983 .

[33]  Raj Chetty,et al.  Adjustment Costs, Firm Responses, and Micro vs. Macro Labor Supply Elasticities: Evidence from Danish Tax Records. , 2011, The quarterly journal of economics.

[34]  M. Rabin,et al.  A Model of Reference-Dependent Preferences , 2006 .

[35]  Henk Elffers,et al.  Decision frame and opportunity as determinants of tax cheating: An international experimental study , 1990 .

[36]  Boris Maciejovsky,et al.  Tax compliance within the context of gain and loss situations, expected and current asset position, and profession , 2001 .

[37]  R. Kanbur,et al.  Moral Hazard, Income Taxation and Prospect Theory , 2008 .

[38]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[39]  M. Rabin,et al.  Reference-Dependent Risk Attitudes , 2007 .

[40]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[41]  Damon Jones Inertia and Overwithholding: Explaining the Prevalence of Income Tax Refunds , 2010 .