Distinctiveness revisited: Unpredictable temporal isolation does not benefit short-term serial recall of heard or seen events

The notion of a link between time and memory is intuitively appealing and forms the core assumption of temporal distinctiveness models. Distinctiveness models predict that items that are temporally isolated from their neighbors at presentation should be recalled better than items that are temporally crowded. By contrast, event-based theories consider time to be incidental to the processes that govern memory, and such theories would not imply a temporal isolation advantage unless participants engaged in a consolidation process (e.g., rehearsal or selective encoding) that exploited the temporal structure of the list. In this report, we examine two studies that assessed the effect of temporal distinctiveness on memory, using auditory (Experiment 1) and auditory and visual (Experiment 2) presentation with unpredictably varying interitem intervals. The results show that with unpredictable intervals temporal isolation does not benefit memory, regardless of presentation modality.

[1]  I. Neath.  Contextual and distinctive processes and the serial position function. , 1993 .

[2]  S E Avons,et al.  The Word-length Effect and Disyllabic Words , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[3]  R. G. Crowder,et al.  On the remembrance of times past: The irregular list technique. , 1987 .

[4]  Gordon D. A. Brown,et al.  Serial recall and presentation schedule: A micro‐analysis of local distinctiveness , 2005, Memory.

[5]  A. Glenberg,et al.  Evidence for auditory temporal distinctiveness: modality effects in order and frequency judgments. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  Lisa M. Nimmo,et al.  From brief gaps to very long pauses: temporal isolation does not benefit serial recall. , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[7]  Gordon D. A. Brown,et al.  The chronological organization of memory : common psychological foundations for remembering and timing , 2001 .

[8]  R. G. Crowder,et al.  Accuracy of temporal coding: Auditory-visual comparisons , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[9]  K. Lashley.  The problem of serial order in behavior , 1951 .

[10]  R. G. Crowder,et al.  Distinctiveness and very short-term serial position effects. , 1996, Memory.

[11]  N. Burgess.  Memory for Serial Order : A Network Model of the Phonological Loop and its Timing , 1999 .

[12]  R. Bjork,et al.  Recency-sensitive retrieval processes in long-term free recall☆ , 1974 .

[13]  S. E. Avons,et al.  Output Decay in Immediate Serial Recall: Speech Time Revisited ☆ , 2002 .

[14]  B B Murdock,et al.  TODAM2: a model for the storage and retrieval of item, associative, and serial-order information. , 1993, Psychological review.

[15]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[16]  C. Penney.  Modality effects and the structure of short-term verbal memory , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[17]  S. Lewandowsky,et al.  An endogenous distributed model of ordering in serial recall , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[18]  K. Laughery,et al.  Short-term memory: The effects of inter-item time distribution and recall procedure. , 1971 .

[19]  J. S. Nairne.  A feature model of immediate memory , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[20]  Arthur M. Glenberg,et al.  Modality effects in the coding reproduction of rhythms , 1989 .

[21]  G D Brown,et al.  Oscillator-based memory for serial order. , 2000, Psychological review.

[22]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[23]  D C LeCompte,et al.  Short-term memory for the timing of auditory and visual signals. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  Menachem Jona,et al.  Temporal coding in rhythm tasks revealed by modality effects , 1991, Memory & cognition.

[25]  J M Gardiner,et al.  On recency and echoic memory. , 1983, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[26]  R. G. Crowder,et al.  Schedules of presentation and temporal distinctiveness in human memory. , 1990 .

[27]  Nelson Cowan,et al.  Rethinking Speed Theories of Cognitive Development , 2006, Psychological science.

[28]  Gordon D. A. Brown,et al.  Time does not cause forgetting in short-term serial recall , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[29]  A. Glenberg,et al.  A temporal distinctiveness theory of recency and modality effects. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  R. Henson.  Short-Term Memory for Serial Order: The Start-End Model , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[31]  I. Neath.  Modelling the Disruptive Effects of Irrelevant Speech on Order Information , 1999 .

[32]  D. Norris,et al.  The primacy model: a new model of immediate serial recall. , 1998, Psychological review.