A method and software for segmentation of anatomic object ensembles by deformable m-reps.

Deformable shape models (DSMs) comprise a general approach that shows great promise for automatic image segmentation. Published studies by others and our own research results strongly suggest that segmentation of a normal or near-normal object from 3D medical images will be most successful when the DSM approach uses (1) knowledge of the geometry of not only the target anatomic object but also the ensemble of objects providing context for the target object and (2) knowledge of the image intensities to be expected relative to the geometry of the target and contextual objects. The segmentation will be most efficient when the deformation operates at multiple object-related scales and uses deformations that include not just local translations but the biologically important transformations of bending and twisting, i.e., local rotation, and local magnification. In computer vision an important class of DSM methods uses explicit geometric models in a Bayesian statistical framework to provide a priori information used in posterior optimization to match the DSM against a target image. In this approach a DSM of the object to be segmented is placed in the target image data and undergoes a series of rigid and nonrigid transformations that deform the model to closely match the target object. The deformation process is driven by optimizing an objective function that has terms for the geometric typicality and model-to-image match for each instance of the deformed model. The success of this approach depends strongly on the object representation, i.e., the structural details and parameter set for the DSM, which in turn determines the analytic form of the objective function. This paper describes a form of DSM called m-reps that has or allows these properties, and a method of segmentation consisting of large to small scale posterior optimization of m-reps. Segmentation by deformable m-reps, together with the appropriate data representations, visualizations, and user interface, has been implemented in software that accomplishes 3D segmentations in a few minutes. Software for building and training models has also been developed. The methods underlying this software and its abilities are the subject of this paper.

[1]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  The Use of Active Shape Models for Locating Structures in Medical Images , 1993, IPMI.

[2]  R. Brubaker Models for the perception of speech and visual form: Weiant Wathen-Dunn, ed.: Cambridge, Mass., The M.I.T. Press, I–X, 470 pages , 1968 .

[3]  Demetri Terzopoulos,et al.  Deformable models in medical image analysis: a survey , 1996, Medical Image Anal..

[4]  Jun Wang,et al.  Medical image compression by using three-dimensional wavelet transformation , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[5]  Edward L. Chaney,et al.  Medial Techniques to Automate Finite Element Analysis of Prostate Deformation , 2003 .

[6]  P. Thomas Fletcher,et al.  Prostate Shape Modeling Based on Principal Geodesic Analysis Bootstrapping , 2004, MICCAI.

[7]  Conglin Lu,et al.  A Markov Random Field Approach to Multi-scale Shape Analysis , 2003, Scale-Space.

[8]  E. Catmull,et al.  Recursively generated B-spline surfaces on arbitrary topological meshes , 1978 .

[9]  P. Thomas Fletcher,et al.  Principal geodesic analysis for the study of nonlinear statistics of shape , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  P. Thomas Fletcher,et al.  Multi-scale 3-D Deformable Model Segmentation Based on Medial Description , 2001, IPMI.

[11]  P. Thomas Fletcher,et al.  Common Shape Model and Inter-individual Variations of the Heart using Medial Representation , 2004 .

[12]  Q. Han,et al.  Representing multifigure anatomical objects , 2004, 2004 2nd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro (IEEE Cat No. 04EX821).

[13]  Edward L. Chaney,et al.  Medially Based Meshing with Finite Element Analysis of Prostate Deformation , 2003, MICCAI.

[14]  Hervé Delingette,et al.  General Object Reconstruction Based on Simplex Meshes , 1999, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[15]  Andrew Thall,et al.  Fast C 2 Interpolating Subdivision Surfaces using Iterative Inversion of Stationary Subdivision Rules , 2003 .

[16]  Edward L. Chaney,et al.  Clustering on image boundary regions for deformable model segmentation , 2004, 2004 2nd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro (IEEE Cat No. 04EX821).

[17]  Paul A. Yushkevich,et al.  Deformable M-Reps for 3D Medical Image Segmentation , 2003, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[18]  Paul A. Yushkevich,et al.  Segmentation, registration, and measurement of shape variation via image object shape , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[19]  Martin Styner,et al.  Medial Models Incorporating Object Variability for 3D Shape Analysis , 2001, IPMI.

[20]  P. Thomas Fletcher,et al.  Deformable m-rep segmentation of object complexes , 2002, Proceedings IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging.

[21]  Yueh-Yun Chi,et al.  Comparison of human and automatic segmentations of kidneys from CT images. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  James S. Duncan,et al.  Model-based deformable surface finding for medical images , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[23]  Conglin Lu,et al.  Representing Multi-Figure Anatomical Objects , 2004, ISBI.

[24]  A. Kelemen,et al.  Three-dimensional model-based segmentation of brain MRI , 1998, Proceedings. Workshop on Biomedical Image Analysis (Cat. No.98EX162).

[25]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Elastic model-based segmentation of 3-D neuroradiological data sets , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.