Motherhood: a potential source of bias in employment decisions.

Results of 2 experimental studies in which job incumbents were said to be applying for promotions to traditionally male positions demonstrated bias against mothers in competence expectations and in screening recommendations. This bias occurred regardless of whether the research participants were students (Study 1) or working people (Study 2). Although anticipated job commitment, achievement striving, and dependability were rated as generally lower for parents than for nonparents, anticipated competence was uniquely low for mothers. Mediational analyses indicated that, as predicted, negativity in competence expectations, not anticipated job commitment or achievement striving, promoted the motherhood bias in screening recommendations; expected deficits in agentic behaviors, not in dependability, were found to fuel these competence expectations. These findings suggest that motherhood can indeed hinder the career advancement of women and that it is the heightened association with gender stereotypes that occurs when women are mothers that is the source of motherhood's potentially adverse consequences.

[1]  B. Gutek,et al.  Sex Effects on Evaluation , 1980 .

[2]  Paula England,et al.  The Wage Penalty for Motherhood , 2001, American Sociological Review.

[3]  C. Etaugh,et al.  College students' perceptions of mothers: Effects of maternal employment-childrearing pattern and motive for employment , 1995 .

[4]  O. C. Brenner,et al.  The Relationship Between Sex Role Stereotypes And Requisite Management Characteristics Revisited , 1989 .

[5]  A. Eagly,et al.  Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. , 1992 .

[6]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Social cognition, 2nd ed. , 1991 .

[7]  Ronald G. Stansfield,et al.  Sociological Methodology 1982 , 1983 .

[8]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[9]  C. Hoffman,et al.  Gender stereotypes : perception or rationalization? , 1990 .

[10]  J. Waldfogel,et al.  Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 12, Number 1—Winter 1998—Pages 137–156 Understanding the ‘‘Family Gap’ ’ in Pay for Women with Children , 2022 .

[11]  M. Heilman,et al.  Has anything changed? Current characterizations of men, women, and managers. , 1989 .

[12]  Madeline E. Heilman,et al.  The impact of situational factors on personnel decisions concerning women: Varying the sex composition of the applicant pool , 1980 .

[13]  M. Heilman.  Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women's ascent up the organizational ladder. , 2001 .

[14]  K. Deaux,et al.  Mothers and Fathers in the Workplace: How Gender and Parental Status Influence Judgments of Job‐Related Competence , 2004 .

[15]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Data analysis in social psychology. , 1998 .

[16]  C. Etaugh,et al.  Effects of employment status and marital status on perceptions of mothers , 1990 .

[17]  Madeline E. Heilman,et al.  Attractiveness and Corporate Success. Different Causal Attributions for Males and Females , 1985 .

[18]  R. L. Dipboye.  Some Neglected Variables in Research on Discrimination in Appraisals , 1985 .

[19]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  A Continuum of Impression Formation, from Category-Based to Individuating Processes: Influences of Information and Motivation on Attention and Interpretation , 1990 .

[20]  Madeline E. Heilman,et al.  When beauty is beastly: The effects of appearance and sex on evaluations of job applicants for managerial and nonmanagerial jobs. , 1979 .

[21]  T. M. Willemsen,et al.  Gender Typing of the Successful Manager—A Stereotype Reconsidered , 2002 .

[22]  M. Heilman,et al.  When fit is fundamental: performance evaluations and promotions of upper-level female and male managers. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[23]  A. Eagly,et al.  Gender-Stereotypic Images of Occupations Correspond to the Sex Segregation of Employment , 1999 .

[24]  M. Sobel.  Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models , 1982 .

[25]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  When Professionals Become Mothers, Warmth Doesn't Cut the Ice , 2004 .

[26]  M. Heilman,et al.  The vagaries of sex bias: Conditions regulating the undervaluation, equivaluation, and overvaluation of female job applicants , 1988 .

[27]  Shelley J. Correll,et al.  Motherhood as a Status Characteristic , 2004 .

[28]  A. Pazy,et al.  Sex proportion and performance evaluation among high-ranking military officers , 2001 .

[29]  Steven L. Blader,et al.  Assuming preferential selection when the admissions policy is unknown: the effects of gender rarity. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[30]  Disadvantaged by Diversity? The Effects of Diversity Goals on Competence Perceptions1 , 2006 .

[31]  M. Heilman.  Sex stereotypes and their effects in the workplace: What we know and what we don't know. , 1995 .

[32]  Janet K. Swim,et al.  Joan McKay versus John McKay: Do gender stereotypes bias evaluations? , 1989 .

[33]  Madeline E. Heilman,et al.  Sex bias in work settings: The Lack of Fit model. , 1983 .

[34]  M. Heilman,et al.  Why are women penalized for success at male tasks?: the implied communality deficit. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[35]  Jane D. Parent,et al.  Gender and Managerial Stereotypes: Have the Times Changed? , 2002 .

[36]  Henry L. Tosi,et al.  The Effects of the Type and Amount of Information in Sex Discrimination Research: A Meta-Analysis , 1985 .

[37]  Madeline E. Heilman,et al.  The Affirmative Action Stigma Of Incompetence: Effects Of Performance Information Ambiguity , 1997 .