Dynamic Processes of Conceptual Change: Analysis of Constructing Mental Models of Chemical Equilibrium

The purpose of this study was to investigate students' mental models of chemical equili- brium using dynamic science assessments. Research in chemical education has shown that students at various levels have misconceptions about chemical equilibrium. According to Chi's theory of conceptual change, the concept of chemical equilibrium has constraint-based features (e.g., random, simultaneous, uniform activities) that might prevent students from deeply understanding the nature of the concept of chemical equilibrium. In this study, we examined how students learned and constructed their mental models of chemical equilibrium in a cognitive apprenticeship context. Thirty 10th-grade students participated in the study: 10 in a control group and 20 in a treatment group. Both groups were presented with a series of hands- on chemical experiments. The students in the treatment group were instructed based on the main features of cognitive apprenticeship (CA), such as coaching, modeling, scaffolding, articulation, reflection, and ex- ploration. However, the students in the control group (non-CA group) learned from the tutor without explicit CA support. The results revealed that the CA group significantly outperformed the non-CA group. The students in the CA group were capable of constructing the mental models of chemical equilibrium— including dynamic, random activities of molecules and interactions between molecules in the microworld—whereas the students in the non-CA group failed to construct similar correct mental models of chemical equilibrium. The study focuses on the process of constructing mental models, on dynamic changes, and on the actions of students (such as self-monitoring/self-correction) who are learning the concept of chemical equilibrium. Also, we discuss the implications for science education. 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 39: 688-712, 2002

[1]  Jyotsna Vaid,et al.  Creative Thought: An Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes , 2001 .

[2]  Pamela J. Garnett,et al.  Students' Alternative Conceptions in Chemistry: A Review of Research and Implications for Teaching and Learning , 1995 .

[3]  Alan E. Wheeler,et al.  Student misconceptions in chemical equilibrium , 1978 .

[4]  Ron Good,et al.  Problem solving and chemical equilibrium: Successful versus unsuccessful performance , 1989 .

[5]  M. Chi Creativity: Shifting across ontological categories flexibly. , 1997 .

[6]  Susan E. Newman,et al.  Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Craft of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics. Technical Report No. 403. , 1987 .

[7]  P. Hewson,et al.  Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change , 1982 .

[8]  B. Andersson,et al.  Pupils' Explanations of Some Aspects of Chemical Reactions. , 1986 .

[9]  Esther Gussarsky,et al.  Misconceptualization of the chemical equilibrium concept as revealed by different evaluation methods , 1986 .

[10]  Esther Gussarsky,et al.  On the concept “chemical equilibrium”: The associative framework , 1990 .

[11]  M. Chi,et al.  From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts , 1994 .

[12]  K. Murphy,et al.  Psychological Testing: Principles and Applications , 1988 .

[13]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Teaching with analogies: A case study in grade-10 optics , 1993 .

[14]  Esther Gussarsky,et al.  On the chemical equilibrium concept: Constrained word associations and conception , 1988 .

[15]  David F. Treagust,et al.  The Complexity of Teaching and Learning Chemical Equilibrium , 1999 .

[16]  S. Vosniadou Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. , 1994 .

[17]  Relating students' reasoning to the history of science: The case of chemical equilibrium , 1998 .