Simple matrix methods for analyzing diffusion models of choice probability, choice response time, and simple response time

Abstract Diffusion processes (e.g., Wiener process, Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process) are powerful approaches to model human information processes in a variety of psychological tasks. Lack of mathematical tractability, however, has prevented broad applications of these models to empirical data. This tutorial explains step by step, using a matrix approach, how to construct these models, how to implement them on a computer, and how to calculate the predictions made by these models. In particular, we present models for binaries choices for unidimensional and multiattribute choice alternatives; for simple reaction time tasks; and for three alternatives choice problems.

[1]  A. Diederich.  Intersensory facilitation of reaction time: evaluation of counter and diffusion coactivation models , 1995 .

[2]  D. W. Stroock,et al.  Multidimensional Diffusion Processes , 1979 .

[3]  Donald Laming,et al.  Information theory of choice-reaction times , 1968 .

[4]  W. Schwarz,et al.  Diffusion, superposition, and the redundant-targets effect , 1994 .

[5]  Diederich,et al.  Dynamic Stochastic Models for Decision Making under Time Constraints , 1997, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[6]  James T. Townsend,et al.  The Stochastic Modeling of Elementary Psychological Processes , 1983 .

[7]  W. Edwards.  Optimal strategies for seeking information: Models for statistics, choice reaction times, and human information processing ☆ , 1965 .

[8]  A. Diederich.  MDFT account of decision making under time pressure , 2003, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[9]  Gregory K. Miller,et al.  Elements of Applied Stochastic Processes , 1972 .

[10]  S. Karlin,et al.  A second course in stochastic processes , 1981 .

[11]  I. G. MacKenzie,et al.  Stochastic Processes with Applications , 1992 .

[12]  A. Pike.  Stochastic models of choice behaviour: response probabilities and latencies of finite Markov chain systems. , 1966, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[13]  M. Stone.  Models for choice-reaction time , 1960 .

[14]  Franz Schmalhofer,et al.  STOCHASTIC CHOICE HEURISTICS , 1984 .

[15]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  Stochastic Dynamic Models of Response Time and Accuracy: A Foundational Primer. , 2000, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[16]  T. Zandt,et al.  A comparison of two response time models applied to perceptual matching , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[17]  J. Townsend,et al.  Decision field theory: a dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. , 1993, Psychological review.

[18]  L. Morrell,et al.  Intersensory facilitation of reaction time , 1967 .

[19]  Ashby,et al.  A Stochastic Version of General Recognition Theory. , 2000, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[20]  R J AUDLEY,et al.  A stochastic model for individual choice behavior. , 1960, Psychological review.

[21]  A Pacut,et al.  Mathematical modelling of reaction latency: the structure of the models and its motivation. , 1980, Acta neurobiologiae experimentalis.

[22]  R. Heath.  A tandem random walk model for psychological discrimination. , 1981, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[23]  Shane G. Henderson.  Simulation: A Modeler's Approach , 2002 .

[24]  S. Link,et al.  A sequential theory of psychological discrimination , 1975 .

[25]  D. Vickers,et al.  Evidence for an accumulator model of psychophysical discrimination. , 1970, Ergonomics.

[26]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model. , 2001, Psychological review.

[27]  R. Audley,et al.  SOME ALTERNATIVE STOCHASTIC MODELS OF CHOICE1 , 1965 .

[28]  R. Ratcliff.  Theoretical interpretations of the speed and accuracy of positive and negative responses. , 1985, Psychological review.

[29]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Multialternative decision field theory: a dynamic connectionist model of decision making. , 2001, Psychological review.

[30]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Modeling Response Times for Two-Choice Decisions , 1998 .

[31]  Samuel Karlin,et al.  A First Course on Stochastic Processes , 1968 .

[32]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification. , 1997, Psychological review.

[33]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Speed and Accuracy in the Processing of False Statements About Semantic Information , 1982 .

[34]  S. Levin.  Lectu re Notes in Biomathematics , 1983 .

[35]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Order Relations in Perceptual Matching , 2005 .

[36]  J. Kingman.  A FIRST COURSE IN STOCHASTIC PROCESSES , 1967 .

[37]  A. Diederich,et al.  Conflict and the Stochastic-Dominance Principle of Decision Making , 1999 .

[38]  W. Godwin.  Article in Press , 2000 .

[39]  F. Ashby.  A biased random walk model for two choice reaction times , 1983 .

[40]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time. , 1999, Psychological review.

[41]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[42]  Philip L. Smith.  Psychophysically principled models of visual simple reaction time. , 1995 .

[43]  Errol C. Caby.  Elements of Applied Stochastic Processes , 2003, Technometrics.

[44]  R Ratcliff,et al.  Continuous versus discrete information processing modeling accumulation of partial information. , 1988, Psychological review.

[45]  J. Townsend,et al.  Fundamental derivations from decision field theory , 1992 .

[46]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  A diffusion model account of masking in two-choice letter identification. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[47]  Henry C. Tuckwell.  Elementary applications of probability theory , 1988 .