Antiplatelet therapy in patients with myocardial infarction without obstructive coronary artery disease

Objective Approximately 10% of patients with myocardial infarction (MI) have no obstructive coronary artery disease. The prognosis and role of intensified antiplatelet therapy in those patients were evaluated. Methods We analysed data from the Clopidogrel and Aspirin Optimal Dose Usage to Reduce Recurrent Events–Seventh Organisation to Assess Strategies in Ischaemic Symptoms trial randomising patients with ACS referred for early intervention to receive either double-dose (600 mg, day 1; 150 mg, days 2–7; then 75 mg/day) or standard-dose (300 mg, day 1; then 75 mg/day) clopidogrel. Outcomes in patients with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) versus those with obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) and their relation to standard-dose versus double-dose clopidogrel were evaluated. The primary outcome was cardiovascular (CV) death, MI or stroke at 30 days. Results We included 23 783 patients with MI and 1599 (6.7%) with MINOCA. Patients with MINOCA were younger, presented more frequently with non-ST-segment elevation MI and had fewer comorbidities. All-cause mortality (0.6% vs 2.3%, p=0.005), CV mortality (0.6% vs 2.2%, p=0.006), repeat MI (0.5% vs 2.3%, p=0.001) and major bleeding (0.6% vs 2.4%, p<0.0001) were lower among patients with MINOCA than among those with obstructive CAD. Among patients with MINOCA, 2.1% of patients in the double-dose clopidogrel group and 0.6% in the standard-dose group experienced a primary outcome (HR 3.57, 95% CI 1.31 to 9.76), whereas in those with obstructive CAD, rates were 4.3% and 4.7%, respectively (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.03; p value for interaction=0.011). Conclusions Patients with MINOCA are at lower risk of recurrent CV events compared with patients with MI with obstructive CAD. Compared with a standard clopidogrel-based dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) regimen, an intensified dosing strategy appears to offer no additional benefit with a signal of possible harm. Further randomised trials evaluating the effects of potent DAPT in patients with MINOCA are warranted. Trial registration number NCT00335452.

[1]  J. Saw,et al.  Coronary Optical Coherence Tomography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Determine Underlying Causes of MINOCA in Women. , 2020, Circulation.

[2]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. , 2020, European heart journal.

[3]  Yaiza Beatriz Molero-Díez,et al.  Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction , 2019, Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology.

[4]  J. Messenger,et al.  Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries as compared with myocardial infarction and obstructive coronary disease: outcomes in a Medicare population. , 2019, European heart journal.

[5]  H. Jneid,et al.  Contemporary Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Myocardial Infarction in the Absence of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association , 2019, Circulation.

[6]  Kristian Thygesen,et al.  Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018). , 2018, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  P. Armstrong,et al.  Population-level incidence and outcomes of myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA): Insights from the Alberta contemporary acute coronary syndrome patients invasive treatment strategies (COAPT) study. , 2018, International journal of cardiology.

[8]  B. Lindahl,et al.  Predictors of adverse outcome in patients with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery (MINOCA) disease. , 2018, International journal of cardiology.

[9]  A. Kerr,et al.  Myocardial Infarction Without Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease is Not a Benign Condition (ANZACS-QI 10). , 2018, Heart, lung & circulation.

[10]  Marco Valgimigli,et al.  2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). , 2018, European heart journal.

[11]  M. Gulati,et al.  Mortality of Myocardial Infarction by Sex, Age, and Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease Status in the ACTION Registry–GWTG (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry–Get With the Guidelines) , 2017, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[12]  B. Lindahl,et al.  Medical Therapy for Secondary Prevention and Long-Term Outcome in Patients With Myocardial Infarction With Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease , 2017, Circulation.

[13]  Hang Lee,et al.  Effective anti-thrombotic therapy without stenting: intravascular optical coherence tomography-based management in plaque erosion (the EROSION study) , 2016, European heart journal.

[14]  D. Atar,et al.  ESC working group position paper on myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries. , 2016, European heart journal.

[15]  Peter Scarborough,et al.  Cardiovascular disease in Europe--epidemiological update 2015. , 2015, European heart journal.

[16]  R. Dreyer,et al.  Systematic Review of Patients Presenting With Suspected Myocardial Infarction and Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries , 2015, Circulation.

[17]  H. White,et al.  Prognosis of Patients With Non–ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease: Propensity-Matched Analysis From the Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy Trial , 2014, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[18]  R. Califf,et al.  Outcomes among non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes patients with no angiographically obstructive coronary artery disease: observations from 37,101 patients , 2014, European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care.

[19]  Peter Scarborough,et al.  Cardiovascular disease in Europe: epidemiological update. , 2014, European heart journal.

[20]  D. Atar,et al.  ESC Guidelines for the Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients Presenting With ST-Segment Elevation , 2013 .

[21]  J. Cho,et al.  Are patients with angiographically near-normal coronary arteries who present as acute myocardial infarction actually safe? , 2011, International journal of cardiology.

[22]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Double-dose versus standard-dose clopidogrel and high-dose versus low-dose aspirin in individuals undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes (CURRENT-OASIS 7): a randomised factorial trial , 2010, The Lancet.

[23]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Design and rationale of CURRENT-OASIS 7: a randomized, 2 x 2 factorial trial evaluating optimal dosing strategies for clopidogrel and aspirin in patients with ST and non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes managed with an early invasive strategy. , 2008, American heart journal.

[24]  Mark D. Huffman,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2013, Circulation.

[25]  S. Werns Dose Comparisons of Clopidogrel and Aspirin in Acute Coronary Syndromes , 2011 .