Cost and CO 2 reduction of biomass co-firing using waste wood biomass in Tohoku region, Japan

Abstract This paper aims to estimate the costs and CO2 emissions of wood biomass co-firing in the Tohoku region of Japan. A woody biomass supply system is designed, which comprises of four processes: collection, resource transportation, preprocessing, and fuel transportation. Preprocessing is further divided into two processes: drying and fuel production. Sawmill residue, construction waste, forest residue, thinning residue, and fruit-tree pruning residue are treated as raw materials. Wood chips, pellets, and torrefied pellets (known as black pellets) are regarded as bio-fuels. The raw-material and bio-fuel transportation pathways are optimized using a geographical information system (GIS). In the Tohoku area, the availability of raw-material is 3.6 PJ/y, and the results indicate that the preprocessing plant locations should be widely distributed in that region, because the resource transportation costs have a significantly greater influence on the costs and emissions than the scale effect of the preprocessing facilities. The chip production case exhibits the smallest energy consumption of 3.8 GJ/t, the lowest supply cost of 1558 JPY/GJ, and the largest CO2 reduction of 252 × 103 t CO2/y, whereas the pellet production case exhibits a supply cost and CO2 reduction of 1643 JPY/GJ and 229 × 103 t CO2/y, respectively. The energy consumption, energy waste, and cost of torrefaction are greater than the reductions in the transportation energy and cost due to wider distribution of the preprocessing plants; thus, the black pellet case has a larger supply cost than the chip and pellet cases.

[1]  Jay S. Golden,et al.  Life cycle assessment of co-firing coal and wood pellets in the Southeastern United States , 2017 .

[2]  Raffaele Cavalli,et al.  Comparison of biomass feedstock supply and demand in Northeast Italy , 2011 .

[3]  Koichi Yamamoto,et al.  Wood biomass supply costs and potential for biomass energy plants in Japan , 2012 .

[4]  Zuoming Liu,et al.  The moderating role of biomass availability in biopower co-firing — A sensitivity analysis , 2016 .

[5]  Frank Schultmann,et al.  Assessing the integration of torrefaction into wood pellet production , 2014 .

[6]  L. Aye,et al.  Potential forest biomass resource as feedstock for bioenergy and its economic value in Indonesia , 2017 .

[7]  Edsger W. Dijkstra,et al.  A note on two problems in connexion with graphs , 1959, Numerische Mathematik.

[8]  Amit Kumar,et al.  Optimal siting and size of bioenergy facilities using geographic information system , 2012 .

[9]  Gijsbert Korevaar,et al.  Life cycle assessment of direct co-firing of torrefied and/or pelletised woody biomass with coal in The Netherlands , 2014 .

[10]  Ingwald Obernberger,et al.  The Pellet Handbook: The Production and Thermal Utilization of Biomass Pellets , 2010 .

[11]  Jonas Flodén,et al.  Analysing biomass torrefaction supply chain costs. , 2013, Bioresource technology.

[13]  Tomohiro Tabata,et al.  Life cycle assessment for co-firing semi-carbonized fuel manufactured using woody biomass with coal: A case study in the central area of Wakayama, Japan , 2011 .

[14]  Yoshiki Yamagata,et al.  Woody biomass supply potential for thermal power plants in Japan , 2010 .

[15]  Minoru Fujii,et al.  Geospatial distribution of ecosystem services and biomass energy potential in eastern Japan , 2016 .

[16]  F. Al-Mansour,et al.  An evaluation of biomass co-firing in Europe. , 2010 .

[17]  C. Cormos,et al.  Technico-economic assessment of coal and sawdust co-firing power generation with CO2 capture , 2015 .

[18]  O. Le Corre,et al.  Environmental performance assessment of retrofitting existing coal fired power plants to co-firing with biomass: carbon footprint and emergy approach , 2015 .

[19]  E. Toklu,et al.  Biomass energy potential and utilization in Turkey , 2017 .