Task-based model/human observer evaluation of SPIHT wavelet compression with human visual system-based quantization.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE The set partitioning in hierarchical trees (SPIHT) wavelet image compression algorithm with the human visual system (HVS) quantization matrix was investigated using x-ray coronary angiograms. We tested whether the HVS quantization matrix for the SPIHT wavelet compression improved computer model/human observer performance in a detection task with variable signals compared to performance with the default quantization matrix. We also tested the hypothesis of whether evaluating the rank order of the two quantization matrices (HVS versus default) based on performance of computer model observers in a signal known exactly but variable task (SKEV) generalized to model/human performance in the more clinically realistic signal known statistically task (SKS). MATERIALS AND METHODS Nine hundred test images were created using real x-ray coronary angiograms as backgrounds and simulated arteries with filling defects (signals). The task for the model and human observer was to detect which one of the four computer simulated arterial segments contained the signal, four alternative-forced-choice (4 AFC). We obtained performance for four model observers (nonprewhitening matched filter with an eye filter, Hotelling, Channelized Hotelling, and Laguerre Gauss Hotelling model observers) for both the SKEV and SKS tasks with images compressed with and without the HVS quantization matrix. A psychophysical study measured performance from three human observers for the same conditions and tasks as the model observers. RESULTS Performance for all four model observers improved with the use of the HVS quantization scheme. Improvements ranged from 5% (at compression ratio 7:1) to 50% (at compression ratio 30:1) for both the SKEV and SKS tasks. Human observer performance improvement averaged across observers ranged from 6% (at compression ratio 7:1) to 35% (at compression ratio 30:1) for the SKEV task and from 2% (at compression ratio 7:1) to 38% (at compression ratio 30:1) for the SKS task. Addition of internal noise to the model observers allowed for good prediction of human performance. CONCLUSIONS Use of the HVS quantization scheme in the SPIHT wavelet compression led to improved model and human observer performance in clinically relevant detection tasks in x-ray coronary angiograms. Model observer performance can be reliably used to predict the human observer performance for the studied tasks as a function of SPIHT wavelet image compression. Our results further confirmed that model observer performance in the computationally more tractable SKEV task can be potentially used as a figure of merit for the more clinically realistic SKS task with real anatomic backgrounds.

[1]  Kim Yongmin Medical Imaging 1994: Image Capture, Formatting and Display , 1994 .

[2]  H H Barrett,et al.  Effect of random background inhomogeneity on observer detection performance. , 1992, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[3]  M. Eckstein,et al.  Simulating coronary arteries in x-ray angiograms. , 2000, Medical physics.

[4]  H. Barrett,et al.  Effect of noise correlation on detectability of disk signals in medical imaging. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[5]  Kenneth G. Morris,et al.  Lossy (15:1) JPEG Compression of Digital Coronary Angiograms Does Not Limit Detection of Subtle Morphological Features , 1996 .

[6]  Harrison H Barrett,et al.  Validating the use of channels to estimate the ideal linear observer. , 2003, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[7]  M Eckstein,et al.  Observer performance for JPEG vs. Wavelet image compression of x-ray coronary angiograms. , 1999, Optics express.

[8]  Bruce Kuo Ting Ho,et al.  Radiological image compression using wavelet transform with arithmetic coding , 1994, Medical Imaging.

[9]  A E Burgess,et al.  Visual signal detection. II. Signal-location identification. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[10]  Miguel P. Eckstein,et al.  JPEG 2000 encoder options on model observer performance in signal known exactly but variable tasks (SKEV) , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[11]  Gerhard Koning,et al.  Effect of lossy data compression on quantitative coronary measurements , 1997, The International Journal of Cardiac Imaging.

[12]  Jay Bartroff,et al.  Automated computer evaluation and optimization of image compression of x-ray coronary angiograms for signal known exactly detection tasks. , 2003, Optics express.

[13]  J. Reiber,et al.  Effect of data compression on quantitative coronary measurements. , 1995, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[14]  M P Eckstein,et al.  Lesion detection in structured noise. , 1995, Academic radiology.

[15]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  Effect of image compression for model and human observers in signal-known-statistically tasks , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[16]  Matt A. King,et al.  Channelized hotelling and human observer correlation for lesion detection in hepatic SPECT imaging. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  Model observers for signal-known-statistically tasks (SKS) , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[18]  J. A. Campbell ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY. , 1965, The American journal of roentgenology, radium therapy, and nuclear medicine.

[19]  A E Burgess,et al.  Visual signal detection. IV. Observer inconsistency. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[20]  H H Barrett,et al.  Human- and model-observer performance in ramp-spectrum noise: effects of regularization and object variability. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[21]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  Stabilized estimates of Hotelling-observer detection performance in patient-structured noise , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[22]  M P Eckstein,et al.  Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds. II. Effects of contrast gain control, background variations, and white noise. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[23]  Ronald A. DeVore,et al.  Image compression through wavelet transform coding , 1992, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[24]  R. Harrington,et al.  Lossy (15:1) JPEG compression of digital coronary angiograms does not limit detection of subtle morphological features. , 1997, Circulation.

[25]  A E Burgess Visual signal detection with two-component noise: low-pass spectrum effects. , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[26]  Majid Rabbani,et al.  An overview of the JPEG 2000 still image compression standard , 2002, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[27]  D G Pelli,et al.  Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[28]  Kyle J. Myers,et al.  Model observers for assessment of image quality , 1993 .

[29]  Michel Barlaud,et al.  Image coding using wavelet transform , 1992, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[30]  A E Burgess,et al.  Visual signal detectability with two noise components: anomalous masking effects. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[31]  W. P. Tanner PHYSIOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS OF PSYCHOPHYSICAL DATA * , 1961, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[32]  G. B. John Mancini,et al.  Cardiac angiography without cine film: erecting a "Tower of Babel" in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. American College of Cardiology Cardiac Catheterization Committee. , 1994, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[33]  M P Eckstein,et al.  Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds. III. Calculation of figures of merit for model observers in statistically nonstationary backgrounds. , 2000, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[34]  Amir Said,et al.  Wavelet compression of medical images with set partitioning in hierarchical trees , 1996, Medical Imaging.

[35]  Rüdiger Brennecke,et al.  Comparison of image compression viability for lossy and lossless JPEG and Wavelet data reduction in coronary angiography , 2001, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[36]  Kenneth E. Weaver,et al.  An Assortment Of Image Quality Indexes For Radiographic Film-Screen Combinations ---Can They Be Resolved? , 1972, Other Conferences.

[37]  Joan L. Mitchell,et al.  JPEG: Still Image Data Compression Standard , 1992 .

[38]  A. Burgess Statistically defined backgrounds: performance of a modified nonprewhitening observer model. , 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[39]  Theodoros N. Arvanitis,et al.  A multistage perceptual quality assessment for compressed digital angiogram images , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[40]  M P Eckstein,et al.  Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds. I. Effect of number of possible spatial locations and signal contrast. , 1996, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[41]  A. Burgess,et al.  Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise. , 2001, Medical physics.

[42]  Miguel P. Eckstein,et al.  Automated optimization of JPEG 2000 encoder options based on model observer performance for detecting variable signals in X-ray coronary angiograms , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[43]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Unified SNR analysis of medical imaging systems , 1985, Physics in medicine and biology.

[44]  B. Harrawood,et al.  Compression of digital coronary angiograms does not affect visual or quantitative assessment of coronary artery stenosis severity. , 1996, The American journal of cardiology.

[45]  W. W. Peterson,et al.  The theory of signal detectability , 1954, Trans. IRE Prof. Group Inf. Theory.

[46]  William A. Pearlman,et al.  A new, fast, and efficient image codec based on set partitioning in hierarchical trees , 1996, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol..

[47]  Eric C. Frey,et al.  Application of task-based measures of image quality to optimization and evaluation of three-dimensional reconstruction-based compensation methods in myocardial perfusion SPECT , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.