Testing Decision Rules for Multiattribute Decision Making

This paper investigates the existence of an editing phase and studies the com- pliance of subjects' behaviour with the most popular multiattribute decision rules. We observed that our data comply well with the existence of an editing phase, at least if we allow for a natural error rate of some 25%. We also found a satis- factory performance of certain groups of subjects for the conjunctive rule, for the elimination{by{aspects rule, for the majority rule, and for the maximin rule. Our data suggest, however, rejection of the prominence hypothesis and of the maximax rule. Thus, our experiment sheds light on the existence of an editing phase and on the use of various multiattribute decision rules.

[1]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Dimensional Commensurability and Cue Utilization in Comparative Judgment. , 1974 .

[2]  H. Simon,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .

[3]  David W Harless,et al.  The predictive utility of generalized expected utility theories , 1994 .

[4]  A. Tversky,et al.  Contingent weighting in judgment and choice , 1988 .

[5]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[6]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  KNOWING WHAT YOU WANT: MEASURING LABILE VALUES , 1988 .

[7]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Compensatory Choice Models of Noncompensatory Processes: The Effect of Varying Context , 1984 .

[8]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structure of "Unstructured" Decision Processes , 1976 .

[9]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[10]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Multiplicative Utility Functions , 1974, Oper. Res..

[11]  Joel Huber,et al.  Market Boundaries and Product Choice: Illustrating Attraction and Substitution Effects , 1983 .

[12]  D. H. Wedell,et al.  Distinguishing Among Models of Contextually Induced Preference Reversals , 1991 .

[13]  Allan D. Shocker,et al.  Toward understanding the attraction effect: The implications of product stimulus meaningfulness and familiarity. , 1987 .

[14]  R. Dawes.  SOCIAL SELECTION BASED ON MULTIDIMENSIONAL CRITERIA. , 1964, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[15]  Peter C. Fishburn,et al.  A Survey of Multiattribute/Multicriterion Evaluation Theories , 1978 .

[16]  Martin Weber,et al.  The Effect of Attribute Ranges on Weights in Multiattribute Utility Measurements , 1993 .

[17]  Steven M. Shugan.  The Cost Of Thinking , 1980 .

[18]  J. Bettman,et al.  Effects of Information Presentation Format on Consumer Information Acquisition Strategies , 1977 .

[19]  F. Restle.  Psychology of judgment and choice , 1961 .

[20]  Robert Sugden,et al.  Probability and juxtaposition effects: An experimental investigation of the common ratio effect , 1989 .

[21]  H. J. Einhorn.  The use of nonlinear, noncompensatory models in decision making. , 1970, Psychological bulletin.

[22]  P. Farquhar,et al.  Decision structuring with phantom alternatives , 1993 .

[23]  D. B. Yntema,et al.  Man-Computer Cooperation in Decisions Requiring Common Sense , 1961 .

[24]  R. Shepard.  Attention and the metric structure of the stimulus space. , 1964 .

[25]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[26]  Peter A. White,et al.  Limitations on verbal reports of internal events: A refutation of Nisbett and Wilson and of Bem. , 1980 .

[27]  R. Luce,et al.  The Choice Axiom after Twenty Years , 1977 .

[28]  A. Tversky.  Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. , 1972 .

[29]  Peter H. Farquhar,et al.  Errata to “A Survey of Multiattribute Utility Theory and Applications” , 1978 .

[30]  John W. Payne,et al.  Contingent decision behavior. , 1982 .

[31]  J. Hey,et al.  INVESTIGATING GENERALIZATIONS OF EXPECTED UTILITY THEORY USING EXPERIMENTAL DATA , 1994, Experiments in Economics.

[32]  John W. Payne,et al.  Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis☆ , 1976 .

[33]  C. Coombs.  A theory of data. , 1965, Psychology Review.

[34]  P. Slovic.  Choice Between Equally Valued Alternatives. , 1975 .

[35]  A. Tversky.  Intransitivity of preferences. , 1969 .

[36]  Ola Svenson,et al.  On decision rules and information processing strategies for choices among multiattribute alternatives , 1976 .

[37]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. , 1977 .

[38]  Clyde H. Coombs,et al.  Nonmetric factor analysis , 1955 .

[39]  Katrin Borcherding,et al.  Biases in multiattribute weight elicitation , 1995 .

[40]  R. Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis. , 1960 .

[41]  O. Svenson.  Process descriptions of decision making. , 1979 .

[42]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Limits on perception of cognitive processes: A reply to Nisbett and Wilson. , 1978 .

[43]  W. Edwards,et al.  Costs and payoffs in perceptual research. , 1982 .

[44]  B. Dosher,et al.  Strategies for multiattribute binary choice. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[45]  A. Tversky.  Choice by elimination , 1972 .

[46]  V. Smith.  Microeconomic Systems as an Experimental Science , 1982 .

[47]  Martin Weber,et al.  Behavioral influences on weight judgments in multiattribute decision making , 1993 .

[48]  Colin Camerer.  An experimental test of several generalized utility theories , 1989 .

[49]  John D. Hey,et al.  Circles and triangles an experimental estimation of indifference lines in the marschak‐machina triangle , 1990 .

[50]  P. Slovic,et al.  Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions. , 1971 .

[51]  W. Edwards,et al.  Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research , 1986 .

[52]  Henry Montgomery,et al.  Decision Rules and the Search for a Dominance Structure: Towards a Process Model of Decision Making* , 1983 .

[53]  Glenn W. Harrison,et al.  Expected utility theory and the experiments , 1994 .

[54]  Robert J. Meyer,et al.  Empirical Generalizations in the Modeling of Consumer Choice , 1995 .

[55]  R. Luce.  A PROBABILISTIC THEORY OF UTILITY , 1958 .

[56]  John W. Payne,et al.  Preferences among gambles with equal underlying distributions , 1971 .

[57]  H. J. Einhorn.  Use of nonlinear, noncompensatory models as a function of task and amount of information , 1971 .

[58]  H. D. Block,et al.  Random Orderings and Stochastic Theories of Responses (1960) , 1959 .

[59]  H. Raiffa,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives , 1993 .

[60]  J. Payne,et al.  Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives: Violations of Regularity & the Similarity Hypothesis. , 1981 .

[61]  J. E. Russo,et al.  The Value of Unit Price Information , 1977 .

[62]  John S. Chipman,et al.  Stochastic Choice and Subjective Probability , 1960 .

[63]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Importance of variance preferences in gambling decisions , 1968 .

[64]  V. Smith.  Monetary Rewards and Decision Cost in Experimental Economics: An Extension , 1993 .

[65]  Ajay K. Manrai,et al.  Mathematical models of brand choice behavior , 1995 .

[66]  John H. Kagel,et al.  Testing between alternative models of choice under uncertainty: Some initial results , 1990 .

[67]  Rakesh K. Sarin,et al.  Measurable Multiattribute Value Functions , 1979, Oper. Res..

[68]  Glenn W. Harrison,et al.  Expected Utility Theory and the Experimentalists , 1994 .