Rheological evaluation of the physical properties of hyaluronic acid dermal fillers.

BACKGROUND Hyaluronic acid (HA) gels are commonly injected into the skin to lift rhytides and to improve facial appearance. The different processes used in their manufacture and formulation yield products with unique physical characteristics that play an important role in predicting their clinical performance. OBJECTIVE The following rheologic evaluation was performed to objectively measure the physical characteristics of HA dermal filler products derived from similar bacterial sources and containing the same butanediol diglycidyl ether cross-linker, but formulated using different manufacturing techniques. The objective of this study was to evaluate the physical characteristics of two distinct families of HA products, thereby providing clinicians with a greater understanding of these products' attributes and the ability to optimize their use in the treatment of patients seeking facial rejuvenation. MATERIALS AND METHODS The physical properties of commercially-available dermal fillers containing HA were evaluated using rheologic testing methods under clinically-relevant conditions. Additionally, light microscopy was used to assess the particulate nature of each product. RESULTS The gels tested demonstrated a broad range of elasticity, firmness and viscosity. Light microscopy confirmed the particulate nature of each product and revealed HA particles of varying size and distribution. CONCLUSION This rheologic evaluation demonstrates that differences exist among the HA products tested including gel elasticity, viscosity, and the range and distribution of gel particle sizes. Understanding the distinct physical characteristics of different HA dermal fillers and how these characteristics may predict their clinical behavior can assist clinicians in achieving the desired results in patients seeking facial rejuvenation.

[1]  D. Fagrell,et al.  A Randomized, Evaluator-Blind, Multicenter Comparison of the Efficacy and Tolerability of Perlane versus Zyplast in the Correction of Nasolabial Folds , 2005, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[2]  J. Leyden,et al.  A Randomized, Double‐Blind, Multicenter Comparison of the Efficacy and Tolerability of Restylane Versus Zyplast for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds , 2003, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[3]  Hema Sundaram,et al.  Comparison of the Rheological Properties of Viscosity and Elasticity in Two Categories of Soft Tissue Fillers: Calcium Hydroxylapatite and Hyaluronic Acid , 2010, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[4]  J. Dover,et al.  Review of the Efficacy, Durability, and Safety Data of Two Nonanimal Stabilized Hyaluronic Acid Fillers from a Prospective, Randomized, Comparative, Multicenter Study , 2009, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[5]  R. Weiss,et al.  Hyaluronic Acid Fillers: A Comprehensive Review , 2009, Facial plastic surgery : FPS.

[6]  A. Cazzaniga,et al.  Hyaluronic acid gel fillers in the management of facial aging , 2008, Clinical interventions in aging.

[7]  J. Carruthers,et al.  Non–Animal-Based Hyaluronic Acid Fillers: Scientific and Technical Considerations , 2007, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[8]  Leslie Baumann,et al.  Hyaluronic acid gel ( Juvéderm™) preparations in the treatment of facial wrinkles and folds , 2008, Clinical interventions in aging.

[9]  R. Price,et al.  Perspectives in the selection of hyaluronic acid fillers for facial wrinkles and aging skin , 2009, Patient preference and adherence.

[10]  R. Weiss,et al.  Randomized, Double‐Blind, Split‐Face Study of Small‐Gel‐Particle Hyaluronic Acid with and without Lidocaine During Correction of Nasolabial Folds , 2010 .

[11]  S. Dayan,et al.  Persistence and Improvement of Nasolabial Fold Correction with Nonanimal‐Stabilized Hyaluronic Acid 100,000 Gel Particles/mL Filler on Two Retreatment Schedules: Results up to 18 Months on Two Retreatment Schedules , 2008, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[12]  James Varani,et al.  In vivo stimulation of de novo collagen production caused by cross-linked hyaluronic acid dermal filler injections in photodamaged human skin. , 2007, Archives of dermatology.

[13]  D. Murphy,et al.  A multi‐center, double‐blind, randomized controlled study of the safety and effectiveness of Juvéderm® injectable gel with and without lidocaine , 2009, Journal of cosmetic dermatology.

[14]  G. Monheit,et al.  Hyaluronic acid fillers , 2006, Dermatologic therapy.

[15]  M. Pinsky,et al.  Juvéderm injectable gel: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized study of safety and effectiveness. , 2008, Aesthetic surgery journal.

[16]  Glenn H Fredrickson,et al.  The science of hyaluronic acid dermal fillers , 2008, Journal of cosmetic and laser therapy : official publication of the European Society for Laser Dermatology.

[17]  G. Monheit,et al.  Comparison of Smooth‐Gel Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Fillers with Cross‐linked Bovine Collagen: A Multicenter, Double‐Masked, Randomized, Within‐Subject Study , 2007, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[18]  S. Bentkover,et al.  The Biology of Facial Fillers , 2009, Facial plastic surgery : FPS.

[19]  B. Rzany,et al.  Hyaluronidase in the correction of hyaluronic acid‐based fillers: a review and a recommendation for use , 2009, Journal of cosmetic dermatology.

[20]  G. Monheit,et al.  Comparative Physical Properties of Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Fillers , 2009, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[21]  R. Berg,et al.  Crosslinked hyaluronic acid dermal fillers: a comparison of rheological properties. , 2008, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[22]  Marcos Borrell,et al.  Lift capabilities of hyaluronic acid fillers , 2011, Journal of cosmetic and laser therapy : official publication of the European Society for Laser Dermatology.

[23]  F. Brandt,et al.  Persistence of Nasolabial Fold Correction with a Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler with Retreatment: Results of an 18‐Month Extension Study , 2011, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[24]  D. Murphy,et al.  Effectiveness of Juvéderm Ultra Plus Dermal Filler in the Treatment of Severe Nasolabial Folds , 2008, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[25]  X. Zhao Synthesis and characterization of a novel hyaluronic acid hydrogel , 2006, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.