Cyclic Dynamics in Romantic Relationships

Minimal models composed of two ordinary differential equations are considered in this paper to mimic the dynamics of the feelings between two persons. In accordance with attachment theory, individuals are divided into secure and non-secure individuals, and synergic and non-synergic individuals, for a total of four different classes. Then, it is shown that couples composed of secure individuals, as well as those composed of non-synergic individuals can only have stationary modes of behavior. By contrast, couples composed of a secure and synergic individual and a non-secure and non-synergic individual can experience cyclic dynamics. In other words, the coexistence of insecurity and synergism in the couple is the minimum ingredient for cyclic love dynamics. The result is obtained through a detailed local and global bifurcation analysis of the model. Supercritical Hopf, fold and homoclinic bifurcation curves are numerically detected around a Bogdanov–Takens codimension-2 bifurcation point. The existence of a codimension-2 homoclinic bifurcation is also ascertained. The bifurcation structure allows one to identify the role played by individual synergism and reactiveness to partners love and appeal. It also explains why ageing has a stabilizing effect on the dynamics of the feelings. All results are in agreement with common wisdom on the argument. Possible extensions are briefly discussed at the end of the paper.

[1]  Yu. A. Kuznetsov,et al.  NUMERICAL DETECTION AND CONTINUATION OF CODIMENSION-TWO HOMOCLINIC BIFURCATIONS , 1994 .

[2]  Judith A. Feeney,et al.  Attachment Style as a Predictor of Adult Romantic Relationships , 1990 .

[3]  K. Bartholomew,et al.  Attachment styles among young adults: a test of a four-category model. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  Alan Feingold,et al.  Gender differences in effects of physical attractiveness on romantic attraction: A comparison across five research paradigms. , 1990 .

[5]  Michael J. Radzicki,et al.  Dyadic processes, tempestuous relationships, and system dynamics , 1993 .

[6]  F. Fincham,et al.  Attachment style in married couples: Relation to current marital functioning, stability over time, and method of assessment , 1995 .

[7]  Susan S. Hendrick,et al.  Gender differences and similarities in sex and love , 1995 .

[8]  S. Strogatz.  Love Affairs and Differential Equations , 1988 .

[9]  E. Hatfield,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES Mate Selection Preferences : Gender Differences Examined in a National Sample , 2004 .

[10]  D. Griffin,et al.  Models of the self and other: Fundamental dimensions underlying measures of adult attachment. , 1994 .

[11]  Jeffry A. Simpson,et al.  Perception of physical attractiveness: Mechanisms involved in the maintenance of romantic relationships. , 1990 .

[12]  K. Bartholomew,et al.  Reliability and stability of adult attachment patterns. , 1994 .

[13]  Y. Kuznetsov,et al.  Continuation techniques and interactive software for bifurcation analysis of ODEs and iterated maps: physics , 1993 .

[14]  Steven H. Strogatz,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos , 2024 .

[15]  C. Hazan,et al.  Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  S. Read,et al.  Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.