State digital library usability: Contributing organizational factors

Usage and user feedback about a state digital library, in which the developers/designers, content providers, different types of libraries and their staffs, and a variety of user groups represent a loose federation of separate organizations with diverse expectations and needs, are investigated. Through corroboratory evidence from usage statistics of Internet-based database services available through the digital library, responses to a statewide-administered library survey, and a Web-based survey of end users, the authors identify contributing factors for the organizational usability of state digital libraries. The authors refine and enhance an organizational usability model for the unique environment of state digital libraries and identify three modes of interaction (influence, communication, activity) and the challenges each interaction presents: in addressing diverse player needs and expectations; the unequal awareness and training in using state digital libraries; and the lack of sufficient communication channels among players. In addition, the findings highlight the double-edged impact of physical libraries on the state digital library.

[1]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Searching the Web: the public and their queries , 2001 .

[2]  William L. Anderson,et al.  Delivering Technology for Digital Libraries: Experiences as Vendors , 1995, DL.

[3]  C. Davies,et al.  Organizational Influences on the University Electronic Library , 1997, Inf. Process. Manag..

[4]  Jonathan Kies,et al.  User and task analysis for interface design , 1998 .

[5]  Brian Shackel,et al.  Human-computer interaction—whence and whither? , 1997 .

[6]  Dan Greenstein,et al.  Digital Libraries and Their Challenges , 2000, Libr. Trends.

[7]  Rob Kling,et al.  Digital library design for organizational usability , 1994, SIGO.

[8]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability engineering , 1997, The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook.

[9]  Ann Peterson Bishop,et al.  From Usability to Use , 2000 .

[10]  Harry Bruce,et al.  A Study of the Impact of Statewide Database Licensing on Information Provision in Washington State. , 2000 .

[11]  Rob Kling,et al.  Organizational usability of digital libraries: case study of legal research in civil and criminal courts , 1997 .

[12]  B. Schneirdeman,et al.  Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction , 1998 .

[13]  Dietmar Wolfram,et al.  Equalizing Access to Electronic Networked Resources: A Model for Rural Libraries in the United States , 1994, Libr. Trends.

[14]  M. Markus,et al.  The Organizational Validity of Management Information Systems , 1983 .

[15]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Progress Toward Digital Libraries: Augmentation through Integration , 1999, Inf. Process. Manag..

[16]  Pradeep Henry,et al.  User-Centered Information Design for Improved Software Usability , 1998 .

[17]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  A public library based on full-text retrieval , 1998, CACM.

[18]  S. L. Star,et al.  Social informatics of digital library use and infrastructure , 1996 .

[19]  Barbara P. Buttenfield,et al.  Usability Evaluation of Digital Libraries , 1999 .

[20]  José A. Pino,et al.  Computing in Chile: the jaguar of the Pacific Rim? , 1995, CACM.

[21]  Cathryn S. Dippo.  FedStats promotes statistical literacy , 1998, CACM.

[22]  Rob Kling,et al.  Organizational Dimensions of Effective Digital Library Use: Closed Rational and Open Natural Systems Models , 1996, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[23]  Deborah J. Mayhew,et al.  The usability engineering lifecycle , 1999, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[24]  Edward A. Fox,et al.  Digital libraries , 1995, CACM.