Fast Statistical Surrogates for Dynamical 3D Computer Models of Brain Tumors

Understanding how malignant brain tumors are formed and evolve has direct consequences on the development of efficient methods for their early detection and treatment. Adequate mathematical models for brain tumor growth and invasion can be helpful in clarifying some aspects of the mechanism responsible for the tumor. These mathematical models are typically implemented in computer models, which can be used for computer experimentation to study how changes in inputs, such as growth and diffusion parameters, affect the evolution of the virtual brain tumor. The computer model considered in this article is defined on a three-dimensional (3D) anatomically accurate digital representation of the human brain, which includes white and gray matter, and on a time interval of hundreds of days to realistically simulate the tumor development. Consequently, this computer model is very computationally intensive and only small-size computer experiments can be conducted, corresponding to a small sample of inputs. This article presents a computationally efficient multidimensional kriging method to predict the evolution of the virtual brain tumor at new inputs, conditioned on the virtual brain tumor data available from the small-size computer experiment. The analysis shows that this prediction can be more accurate than a computationally competing model.

[1]  J. W. Thomas Numerical Partial Differential Equations: Finite Difference Methods , 1995 .

[2]  Dorin Drignei Empirical Bayesian Analysis for High-Dimensional Computer Output , 2006, Technometrics.

[3]  D. Higdon,et al.  Computer Model Calibration Using High-Dimensional Output , 2008 .

[4]  J. Murray,et al.  A mathematical model of glioma growth: the effect of chemotherapy on spatio‐temporal growth , 1995, Cell proliferation.

[5]  T. J. Mitchell,et al.  Bayesian design and analysis of computer experiments: Use of derivatives in surface prediction , 1993 .

[6]  Mike Rees,et al.  5. Statistics for Spatial Data , 1993 .

[7]  Sonja Kuhnt,et al.  Design and analysis of computer experiments , 2010 .

[8]  M. E. Johnson,et al.  Minimax and maximin distance designs , 1990 .

[9]  Robert Haining,et al.  Statistics for spatial data: by Noel Cressie, 1991, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 900 p., ISBN 0-471-84336-9, US $89.95 , 1993 .

[10]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Design and construction of a realistic digital brain phantom , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  M. J. Bayarri,et al.  Computer model validation with functional output , 2007, 0711.3271.

[12]  J. Murray,et al.  A quantitative model for differential motility of gliomas in grey and white matter , 2000, Cell proliferation.

[13]  Dorin Drignei,et al.  Empirical Bayesian Analysis for Computer Experiments Involving Finite-Difference Codes , 2006 .

[14]  T. J. Mitchell,et al.  Bayesian Prediction of Deterministic Functions, with Applications to the Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments , 1991 .

[15]  James O. Berger,et al.  A Framework for Validation of Computer Models , 2007, Technometrics.

[16]  Kristin R. Swanson,et al.  Dynamics of a model for brain tumors reveals a small window for therapeutic intervention , 2003 .

[17]  Thomas Hochkirchen Design and Modeling for Computer Experiments by K.-T. Fang, R. Li and A. Sudjianto , 2006 .

[18]  Runze Li,et al.  Design and Modeling for Computer Experiments , 2005 .