The influence of stimulus onset asynchrony on neuronal suppressive phenomenon in face processing: An event-related potential study

It has been reported that if two sensory stimuli are presented consecutively with stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) of as short as several hundreds of milliseconds, the neural activity, elicited by the second stimulus, in the stimulus-sensitive area will be inhibited, say, suppressive phenomenon. Using a paired-stimulus paradigm, in which two visual stimuli were successively presented, we investigated the influence of SOA (200ms, 400ms & 600ms) on suppressive phenomenon in face processing. Twelve subjects were asked to passively view randomly ordered paired stimuli and single stimuli, while their event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded simultaneously. To evaluate the suppression, we compared the ERPs elicited by the second face stimulus of the paired stimuli with that elicited by the single face stimulus. It was found that, comparing with the ERPs elicited by single faces, in all three SOA conditions, the ERPs elicited by the second face stimulus of the intra-category trials (face_face trials) were more suppressed than those of the inter-category trials (blank_face and building_face trials) in both occipitotemporal and frontal regions. We surmised that these results might support a “domain specific” theory, which suggested that visual processing of faces and non-face objects involve separate and specialized networks in the ventro-lateral temporal cortex. Interestingly, for the face_face trials, as the SOA increased, the ERP suppression in the frontal region diminished gradually. Such phenomenon might be due to the lasting effect of semantic processing for the first face stimulus.

[1]  S. Ogawa,et al.  Progression of neuronal processing of visual objects , 2007, Neuroreport.

[2]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  fMR-adaptation: a tool for studying the functional properties of human cortical neurons. , 2001, Acta psychologica.

[3]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Source analysis of the N170 to faces and objects , 2004, Neuroreport.

[4]  G. Boynton,et al.  Adaptation: from single cells to BOLD signals , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[5]  R. Marois,et al.  Capacity limits of information processing in the brain , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[6]  Werner Sommer,et al.  Memory systems for structural and semantic knowledge of faces and buildings , 2006, Brain Research.

[7]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding face recognition. , 1986, British journal of psychology.

[8]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  An Area within Human Ventral Cortex Sensitive to “Building” Stimuli Evidence and Implications , 1998, Neuron.

[9]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  N. Kanwisher Domain specificity in face perception , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  S. Ogawa,et al.  An approach to probe some neural systems interaction by functional MRI at neural time scale down to milliseconds. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  C. Rennie,et al.  Decrement of the N1 auditory event-related potential with stimulus repetition: habituation vs. refractoriness. , 1998, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[13]  A. Ishai,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Representations of Faces and Objects in Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2001, Science.

[14]  Timothy J. Andrews,et al.  fMR-adaptation reveals a distributed representation of inanimate objects and places in human visual cortex , 2005, NeuroImage.

[15]  A. Burton,et al.  Event-related brain potential evidence for a response of inferior temporal cortex to familiar face repetitions. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[16]  D. Schacter,et al.  Perceptual specificity in visual object priming: functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence for a laterality difference in fusiform cortex , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[17]  F. Eustache,et al.  The time course of repetition effects for familiar faces and objects: An ERP study , 2009, Brain Research.