Unsupervised Classification of PolSAR Data Using a Scattering Similarity Measure Derived From a Geodesic Distance

In this letter, we propose a novel technique for obtaining scattering components from polarimetric synthetic aperture radar (PolSAR) data using the geodesic distance on the unit sphere. This geodesic distance is obtained between an elementary target and the observed Kennaugh matrix, and it is further utilized to compute a similarity measure between scattering mechanisms. The normalized similarity measure for each elementary target is then modulated with the total scattering power (Span). This measure is used to categorize pixels into three categories, i.e., odd-bounce, double-bounce, and volume, depending on which of the above scattering mechanisms dominate. Then the maximum likelihood classifier of Lee et al. based on the complex Wishart distribution is iteratively used for each category. Dominant scattering mechanisms are thus preserved in this classification scheme. We show results for L-band AIRSAR and ALOS-2 data sets acquired over San Francisco and Mumbai, respectively. The scattering mechanisms are better preserved using the proposed methodology than the unsupervised classification results using the Freeman–Durden scattering powers on an orientation angle corrected PolSAR image. Furthermore: 1) the scattering similarity is a completely nonnegative quantity unlike the negative powers that might occur in double-bounce and odd-bounce scattering component under Freeman–Durden decomposition and 2) the methodology can be extended to more canonical targets as well as for bistatic scattering.

[1]  Laurent Ferro-Famil,et al.  Statistical Classification for Heterogeneous Polarimetric SAR Images , 2011, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[2]  Avik Bhattacharya,et al.  Change Detection in Polarimetric SAR Images Using a Geodesic Distance Between Scattering Mechanisms , 2017, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[3]  Alejandro C. Frery,et al.  The Geodesic Distance between $\mathcal {G}_I^0$ Models and its Application to Region Discrimination , 2017, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[4]  Anthony P. Doulgeris,et al.  An Automatic ${\cal U}$-Distribution and Markov Random Field Segmentation Algorithm for PolSAR Images , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[5]  Laurent Ferro-Famil,et al.  Unsupervised terrain classification preserving polarimetric scattering characteristics , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[6]  谢鸿全 An Unsupervised Segmentation With an Adaptive Number of Clusters Using the SPAN/H/a/A Space and the Complex Wishart Clustering for Fully Polarimetric SAR Data Analysis , 2007 .

[7]  Laurent Ferro-Famil,et al.  Unsupervised classification of multifrequency and fully polarimetric SAR images based on the H/A/Alpha-Wishart classifier , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[8]  Gangyao Kuang,et al.  Unsupervised Land Cover/Land Use Classification Using PolSAR Imagery Based on Scattering Similarity , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[9]  Jian Yang,et al.  Decomposition of the Kennaugh Matrix Based on a New Norm , 2014, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[10]  Eric Pottier,et al.  An entropy based classification scheme for land applications of polarimetric SAR , 1997, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[11]  Thomas L. Ainsworth,et al.  Polarimetric SAR data compensation for terrain azimuth slope variation , 2000, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[12]  J. Kong,et al.  Identification of Terrain Cover Using the Optimum Polarimetric Classifier , 2012 .

[13]  Motoyuki Sato,et al.  Modeling and Interpretation of Scattering Mechanisms in Polarimetric Synthetic Aperture Radar: Advances and perspectives , 2014, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[14]  Carlos H. Muravchik,et al.  Unsupervised Polarimetric SAR Image Classification Using $\mathcal {G}_{p}^{0}$ Mixture Model , 2017, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[15]  Eric Pottier,et al.  Application of the H/A/alpha polarimetric decomposition theorem for land classification , 1997, Optics & Photonics.

[16]  J. Zyl,et al.  Unsupervised classification of scattering behavior using radar polarimetry data , 1989 .

[17]  Corina da Costa Freitas,et al.  Classifying Multifrequency Fully Polarimetric Imagery With Multiple Sources of Statistical Evidence and Contextual Information , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[18]  A.C. Frery,et al.  Clustering of fully polarimetric SAR data using finite Gp0 mixture model and SEM Algorithm , 2008, 2008 15th International Conference on Systems, Signals and Image Processing.

[19]  Ron Kwok,et al.  Classification of multi-look polarimetric SAR imagery based on complex Wishart distribution , 1994 .

[20]  M. Nakahara Geometry, Topology and Physics , 2018 .

[21]  Wen Hong,et al.  An Unsupervised Segmentation With an Adaptive Number of Clusters Using the $SPAN/H/\alpha/A$ Space and the Complex Wishart Clustering for Fully Polarimetric SAR Data Analysis , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[22]  Maoguo Gong,et al.  Unsupervised Classification of Fully Polarimetric SAR Images Based on Scattering Power Entropy and Copolarized Ratio , 2013, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[23]  Stephen L. Durden,et al.  A three-component scattering model for polarimetric SAR data , 1998, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..