High Degree of Genetic Variation of Winter Hardiness in a Panel of Beta vulgaris L.

Growing sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L. subsp. vulgaris [sugar beet cultivar group]) as a winter crop requires the development of a winter sugar beet with controlled bolting and sufficient winter hardiness. To evaluate the genetic variation for winter hardiness in B. vulgaris L., we determined the survival rate (SR) in a panel of 396 accessions tested in eight overwintering field trials in Germany and Belarus. The panel included the cultivar groups sugar beet, fodder beet, garden beet, and leaf beet, as well as the wild beet B. vulgaris subsp. maritima (L.) Arcang. (BVM). Across all environments the effects of accession, environment, and accession x environment interaction were highly significant. Despite the complexity of the trait, the heritability for SR was estimated as h(2) = 0.81, reflecting a large genetic variation in the panel. Environmental SRs ranged from 0.7 to 86.3% with a grand mean of 28.4%+ In all environments at least one accession completely died while the maximum SR ranged from 39.9 to 100%+ On average, sugar beet accessions performed best while accessions with the highest SR were among BVMs and leaf beets. The largest variation for SR was found in BVMs, followed by the leaf beets, whereas sugar beets showed the smallest variation. Our results suggest that winter hardiness in sugar beet is sufficient to survive mild winters but needs to be improved for continental climates with colder winters. Whether the limited variation in sugar beet is sufficient for this has to be further investigated.

[1]  L. Panella,et al.  Broadening the genetic base of sugar beet: introgression from wild relatives , 2007, Euphytica.

[2]  B. Märländer,et al.  Effects of weather variables on sugar beet yield development (Beta vulgaris L.) , 2006 .

[3]  W. Lange,et al.  Natural variation within the genus Beta and its possible use for breeding sugar beet: A review , 1990, Euphytica.

[4]  D. Bartsch,et al.  Overwintering of genetically modified sugar beet, Beta vulgaris L. subsp. vulgaris, as a source for dispersal of transgenic pollen , 1999, Euphytica.

[5]  L. Frese,et al.  Taxonomy of Beta Section Beta , 1989 .

[6]  W. Lange,et al.  Taxonomy and cultonomy of beet (Beta vulgaris L.) , 1999 .

[7]  H. D. Cooper,et al.  Potential of genetic resources and breeding strategies for base-broadening in Beta. , 2000 .

[8]  E. Biancardi,et al.  The origin of rhizomania resistance in sugar beet , 2004, Euphytica.

[9]  R. Klein-Lankhorst,et al.  Inheritance of resistance to beet necrotic yellow vein virus in Beta vulgaris conferred by a second gene for resistance , 1999, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[10]  J. Letschert Beta section beta : biogeographical patterns of variation, and taxonomy , 1993 .

[11]  R. K. Scott,et al.  Sowing sugar beet in autumn in England , 1975, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[12]  Christian Jung,et al.  Flowering time control and applications in plant breeding. , 2009, Trends in plant science.

[13]  D. Hincha,et al.  Plant fructans stabilize phosphatidylcholine liposomes during freeze-drying. , 2000, European journal of biochemistry.

[14]  N. Hautekèete,et al.  Life span in Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima: the effects of age at first reproduction and disturbance , 2002 .

[15]  J. Riley,et al.  An analysis of leaf growth in sugar beet..: I. Leaf appearance and expansion in relation to temperature under controlled conditions , 1985 .

[16]  G. Lester,et al.  Freeze‐Induced Changes in Soluble Carbohydrates of Rye1 , 1985 .

[17]  C. Hoffmann,et al.  Growth analysis of autumn and spring sown sugar beet , 2011 .

[18]  J. Burke,et al.  Genotypic differences in cold tolerance are masked by high sucrose and cytokinin in shoot cultures of sugarbeet , 1994, Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture.

[19]  W. Link,et al.  Study of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) winter-hardiness and development of screening methods , 2008 .