In this paper, we formulate and solve a sequential decision problem of a special type arising in M-ary hypothesis testing. In this problem, a team, comprised of a primary decisionmaker (DM) and N geographically separated subordinate DMs, is faced with the task of deciding which one of the M prespecified hypotheses is true, subject to the constraint that the team is allowed to make at most K measurement. The subordinate DMs serve as information sources for the primary DM. At each stage k, k = 1,2,.., K of the decision process, the primary DM decides which subordinate DM should observe and send the measurement. When the information seeking process terminates, the primary DM makes a decision for the team as to which hypothesis is true. The objective of the team is to maximize the probability of correct decision after K measurements. In this paper, we develop measurement sequencing strategies based on dynamic programming (DP), and a computationally efficient greedy algorithm for this problem. Numerical results show that the performance of greedy measurement sequencing strategy is within 1% of the optimal DP strategy.
[1]
H. F. Dodge,et al.
A method of sampling inspection
,
1929
.
[2]
William B. Rouse,et al.
A Model of Human Decisionmaking in Multiple Process Monitoring Situations
,
1982,
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.
[3]
H. Hotelling.
Experimental Determination of the Maximum of a Function
,
1941
.
[4]
Lawrence D. Brown,et al.
Optimal Policies for a Sequential Decision Process
,
1965
.
[5]
Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.
On How Often the Supervisor Should Sample
,
1970,
IEEE Trans. Syst. Sci. Cybern..
[6]
Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.
Dynamic Decisions and Work Load in Multitask Supervisory Control
,
1980,
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.
[7]
David L. Kleinman,et al.
Some new control theoretic models for human operator display monitoring
,
1976,
1976 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control including the 15th Symposium on Adaptive Processes.