A Comparison between the Fed and the ECB: Taylor Rules

This paper analyzes whether Taylor-type policy rules can be used to describe the behavior of the Federal Reserve and the European Central Bank from the beginning of 1999 until mid 2002. Since there was no common monetary policy for the Euro area before 1999, we examine if the average Central Bank behavior of the countries forming the European Monetary Union can be approximated by a single reaction function. We compare the currency areas by searching for similarities and distinctions between the Taylor-type reaction functions of the two central banks. We pay particular attention to the possible influence of one central bank on the behavior of the other one. The simplest method to test this interdependence is to compare the two reaction functions and try to incorporate the decision variable of one central bank into the other central bank's reaction function. The estimations show that there are significant differences in the reaction functions of both central banks before and after 1999 and between the two central banks. The second result is that the Fed seems to influence the ECB but not vice versa.

[1]  Paul R. Bergin,et al.  Measuring monetary policy interdependence , 2004 .

[2]  B. Hayo,et al.  Monetary policy in the Euro area – lessons from the first years , 2002 .

[3]  Domenico Giannone,et al.  Tracking Greenspan: Systematic and Unsystematic Monetary Policy Revisited , 2002 .

[4]  Glenn D. Rudebusch.  Term Structure Evidence on Interest Rate Smoothing and Monetary Policy Inertia , 2001 .

[5]  Edward Nelson.  UK Monetary Policy 1972-97: A Guide Using Taylor Rules , 2001 .

[6]  E. Jondeau,et al.  Assessing GMM Estimates of the Federal Reserve Reaction Function , 2001 .

[7]  C. Borio.  A hundred ways to skin a cat: comparing monetary policy operation procedures in the United States, Japan and the euro area , 2001 .

[8]  L. Ball.  Policy Rules and External Shocks , 2000 .

[9]  S. Gerlach,et al.  The Taylor Rule and Interest Rates in the EMU Area , 2000 .

[10]  S. Kozicki.  How useful are Taylor rules for monetary policy , 1999 .

[11]  K. Hadri.  Testing The Null Hypothesis Of Stationarity Against The Alternative Of A Unit Root In Panel Data With Serially Correlated Errors , 1999 .

[12]  Athanasios Orphanides.  Monetary policy rules based on real-time data , 2001 .

[13]  Anindya Banerjee,et al.  Error‐correction Mechanism Tests for Cointegration in a Single‐equation Framework , 1998 .

[14]  J. Galí,et al.  Monetary Policy Rules in Practice: Some International Evidence , 1997 .

[15]  James G. MacKinnon,et al.  Numerical Distribution Functions for Unit Root and Cointegration Tests , 1996 .

[16]  M. R. Pakko.  The FOMC in 1993 and 1994: monetary policy in transition , 1995 .

[17]  John B. Taylor.  Discretion versus policy rules in practice , 1993 .

[18]  P. Phillips,et al.  Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root? , 1992 .

[19]  Marvin Goodfriend,et al.  Interest Rates and the Conduct of Monetary Policy , 1990 .