SIMPATIQCO: A Server-Based Software Suite Which Facilitates Monitoring the Time Course of LC–MS Performance Metrics on Orbitrap Instruments

While the performance of liquid chromatography (LC) and mass spectrometry (MS) instrumentation continues to increase, applications such as analyses of complete or near-complete proteomes and quantitative studies require constant and optimal system performance. For this reason, research laboratories and core facilities alike are recommended to implement quality control (QC) measures as part of their routine workflows. Many laboratories perform sporadic quality control checks. However, successive and systematic longitudinal monitoring of system performance would be facilitated by dedicated automatic or semiautomatic software solutions that aid an effortless analysis and display of QC metrics over time. We present the software package SIMPATIQCO (SIMPle AuTomatIc Quality COntrol) designed for evaluation of data from LTQ Orbitrap, Q-Exactive, LTQ FT, and LTQ instruments. A centralized SIMPATIQCO server can process QC data from multiple instruments. The software calculates QC metrics supervising every step of data acquisition from LC and electrospray to MS. For each QC metric the software learns the range indicating adequate system performance from the uploaded data using robust statistics. Results are stored in a database and can be displayed in a comfortable manner from any computer in the laboratory via a web browser. QC data can be monitored for individual LC runs as well as plotted over time. SIMPATIQCO thus assists the longitudinal monitoring of important QC metrics such as peptide elution times, peak widths, intensities, total ion current (TIC) as well as sensitivity, and overall LC–MS system performance; in this way the software also helps identify potential problems. The SIMPATIQCO software package is available free of charge.

[1]  L. Käll,et al.  Quality assessments of peptide–spectrum matches in shotgun proteomics , 2011, Proteomics.

[2]  Lennart Martens,et al.  Quality Control in Proteomics , 2011, Proteomics.

[3]  Joel G. Pounds,et al.  Improved quality control processing of peptide-centric LC-MS proteomics data , 2011, Bioinform..

[4]  Lorenzo J. Vega-Montoto,et al.  QuaMeter: multivendor performance metrics for LC-MS/MS proteomics instrumentation. , 2012, Analytical chemistry.

[5]  Richard D. Smith,et al.  Recommendations for mass spectrometry data quality metrics for open access data (corollary to the Amsterdam principles) , 2012, Proteomics.

[6]  R. Zahedi,et al.  Peptide identification quality control , 2011, Proteomics.

[7]  David L. Tabb,et al.  Performance Metrics for Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Systems in Proteomics Analyses* , 2009, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[8]  R. Durbin,et al.  Systematic Analysis of Human Protein Complexes Identifies Chromosome Segregation Proteins , 2010, Science.

[9]  M. Mann,et al.  Trypsin Cleaves Exclusively C-terminal to Arginine and Lysine Residues*S , 2004, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[10]  Michael J Sweredoski,et al.  LogViewer: a software tool to visualize quality control parameters to optimize proteomics experiments using Orbitrap and LTQ-FT mass spectrometers. , 2011, Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT.

[11]  M. Mann,et al.  Parts per Million Mass Accuracy on an Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer via Lock Mass Injection into a C-trap*S , 2005, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[12]  Matthias Mann,et al.  A Dual Pressure Linear Ion Trap Orbitrap Instrument with Very High Sequencing Speed* , 2009, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[13]  Robert E. Kearney,et al.  A HUPO test sample study reveals common problems in mass spectrometry-based proteomics , 2009, Nature Methods.

[14]  Matthias Mann,et al.  SprayQc: a real-time LC-MS/MS quality monitoring system to maximize uptime using off the shelf components. , 2012, Journal of proteome research.

[15]  A. Nesvizhskii A survey of computational methods and error rate estimation procedures for peptide and protein identification in shotgun proteomics. , 2010, Journal of proteomics.

[16]  Birgit Schilling,et al.  Interlaboratory Study Characterizing a Yeast Performance Standard for Benchmarking LC-MS Platform Performance* , 2009, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[17]  Karl Mechtler,et al.  Quality control in LC‐MS/MS , 2011, Proteomics.

[18]  M. Mann,et al.  MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[19]  A R Forrest,et al.  Quality control. , 1978, British medical journal.

[20]  Robert Burke,et al.  ProteoWizard: open source software for rapid proteomics tools development , 2008, Bioinform..

[21]  Karl Mechtler,et al.  Analysis of protein mixtures from whole-cell extracts by single-run nanoLC-MS/MS using ultralong gradients , 2012, Nature Protocols.