Aquifer response to stream-stage and recharge variations. II. Convolution method and applications

Abstract In this second of two papers, analytical step-response functions, developed in the companion paper for several cases of transient hydraulic interaction between a fully penetrating stream and a confined, leaky, or water-table aquifer, are used in the convolution integral to calculate aquifer heads, streambank seepage rates, and bank storage that occur in response to stream-stage fluctuations and basinwide recharge or evapotranspiration. Two computer programs developed on the basis of these step-response functions and the convolution integral are applied to the analysis of hydraulic interaction of two alluvial stream–aquifer systems in the northeastern and central United States. These applications demonstrate the utility of the analytical functions and computer programs for estimating aquifer and streambank hydraulic properties, recharge rates, streambank seepage rates, and bank storage. Analysis of the water-table aquifer adjacent to the Blackstone River in Massachusetts suggests that the very shallow depth of water table and associated thin unsaturated zone at the site cause the aquifer to behave like a confined aquifer (negligible specific yield). This finding is consistent with previous studies that have shown that the effective specific yield of an unconfined aquifer approaches zero when the capillary fringe, where sediment pores are saturated by tension, extends to land surface. Under this condition, the aquifer's response is determined by elastic storage only. Estimates of horizontal and vertical hydraulic conductivity, specific yield, specific storage, and recharge for a water-table aquifer adjacent to the Cedar River in eastern Iowa, determined by the use of analytical methods, are in close agreement with those estimated by use of a more complex, multilayer numerical model of the aquifer. Streambank leakance of the semipervious streambank materials also was estimated for the site. The streambank-leakance parameter may be considered to be a general (or lumped) parameter that accounts not only for the resistance of flow at the river–aquifer boundary, but also for the effects of partial penetration of the river and other near-stream flow phenomena not included in the theoretical development of the step-response functions.

[1]  C. C. Kisiel,et al.  Application of the Convolution Relation to Estimating Recharge from an Ephemeral Stream , 1970 .

[2]  M. Price.  Comment on ‘Delayed aquifer yield as a phenomenon of delayed air entry’ by Herman Bouwer and R. C. Rice , 1980 .

[3]  A. Moench,et al.  Aquifer response to stream-stage and recharge variations. I. Analytical step-response functions , 2000 .

[4]  R. Gillham.  The capillary fringe and its effect on water-table response , 1984 .

[5]  L. K. Sherman.  Streamflow from rainfall by the unit-graph method , 1932 .

[6]  H. F. Grubb,et al.  Aquifer diffusivity of the Ohio River alluvial aquifer by the flood-wave response method , 1973 .

[7]  Bernard Friedland,et al.  Linear Systems , 1965 .

[8]  ON THE IMPULSE RESPONSE OF AN AQUIFER , 1968 .

[9]  Paul J. Squillace,et al.  Observed and Simulated Movement of Bank‐Storage Water , 1996 .

[10]  Vernon B. Sauer,et al.  Modification of routed streamflow by channel loss and base flow , 1974 .

[11]  George F. Pinder,et al.  Determination of Aquifer Diffusivity from Aquifer Response to Fluctuations in River Stage , 1969 .

[12]  M. I. Rorabaugh,et al.  Ground-water movements and bank storage due to flood stages in surface streams , 1963 .

[13]  Richard J. Reynolds,et al.  Diffusivity of Glacial‐Outwash Aquifer by the Floodwave‐Response Technique , 1987 .

[14]  C. Venetis.  Finite aquifers: Characteristic responses and applications , 1970 .

[15]  W. Zhang.  Transient groundwater flow in an aquifer-aquitard system in response to water level changes in rivers or canals , 1992 .

[16]  H. Bouwer,et al.  Delayed aquifer yield as a phenomenon of delayed air entry , 1978 .

[17]  Allen F. Moench,et al.  Application of the convolution equation to stream-aquifer relationships , 1972 .

[18]  S. E. Serrano,et al.  Modeling transient stream/aquifer interaction with the non-linear Boussinesq equation and its analytical solution , 1998 .

[19]  C. Harvey,et al.  Movement of Agricultural Chemicals Between Surface Water and Ground Water, Lower Cedar River Basin, Iowa , 1996 .

[20]  L. A. Desimone,et al.  Use of Computer Programs STLK1 and STWT1 for Analysis of Stream-Aquifer Hydraulic Interaction , 1999 .

[21]  Development and application of an analytical model of stream/aquifer interaction , 1997 .

[22]  M. Sophocleous.  The Role of Specific Yield in Ground-Water Recharge Estimations: A Numerical Study , 1985 .

[23]  A. Moench,et al.  Analytical Solutions and Computer Programs for Hydraulic Interaction of Stream-Aquifer Systems , 1998 .

[24]  T. Narasimhan,et al.  Transient flow of water to a well in an unconfined aquifer: Applicability of some conceptual models , 1993 .

[25]  D. A. Kraijenhoff van de Leur,et al.  A study of non-steady groundwater flow with special reference to a reservoir coefficient , 1958 .