SPH modeling of fast muddy debris flow: numerical and experimental comparison of certain commonly utilized approaches

SPH (Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics) is a particle, purely mesh-free Lagrangian method, proposed by different authors, well suited to the computing of highly transitory free surface flows of complex fluids in complex geometries. Different approaches have been proposed in order to better simulate the mutual interaction between particles and their interactions with boundaries. Therefore, the main target of this article is to discuss and explore the numerical performance of certain commonly utilized SPH approaches, based essentially on mass and momentum balances, in the simulation of a 2D fast mudflow in fast motion, composed of fluid and solid material, assumed to be just one equivalent phase (fluid-solid). The “Herschel-Bulkley”, non Newtonian constitutive equations, describing a viscoplastic material suitable to reproduce the rheological behaviour of mudflows, has been selected. Hence, a laboratory experimental test, already proposed in literature and, after properly scaling, representative of a real fast flow phenomenon, was considered for comparison with numerical outcomes carried out by a research code that has already been tested and discussed in previous papers. A simple but effective statistical approach was developed and applied in order to identify and utilize a numerical index suitable for the quantitative measurement of the degree of matching between numerical results and measurement data affected by experimental errors. More than thirty numerical experiments were performed, of which the most significant eleven simulations are discussed. Satisfactory results were achieved. As outcomes, it was verified that, in particular for the selected experimental test, Rusanov flux addition within the continuity equation with the proper choice of both the viscosity term of momentum and the SPH boundary conditions, is suited to enhancing the performance of this type of numerical simulation of a fast flow.

[1]  David Rhind,et al.  Geographical data handling: recent developments , 1985 .

[2]  R. E. Craine,et al.  CONTINUUM THEORIES OF MIXTURES: BASIC THEORY AND HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT , 1976 .

[3]  Eugenio Oñate,et al.  The meshless finite element method , 2003 .

[4]  Olivier Pouliquen,et al.  A constitutive law for dense granular flows , 2006, Nature.

[5]  D. Varnes,et al.  Landslide types and processes , 2004 .

[6]  Pep Español,et al.  Smoothed dissipative particle dynamics. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[7]  Jean-Paul Vila,et al.  ON PARTICLE WEIGHTED METHODS AND SMOOTH PARTICLE HYDRODYNAMICS , 1999 .

[8]  David M. Cruden,et al.  LANDSLIDE TYPES AND PROCESSES , 1958 .

[9]  Joe J. Monaghan,et al.  SPH particle boundary forces for arbitrary boundaries , 2009, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[10]  E. Toro.  Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics , 1997 .

[11]  J. Monaghan.  Simulating Free Surface Flows with SPH , 1994 .

[12]  L. Minatti,et al.  Dam break Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamic modeling based on Riemann solvers , 2010 .

[13]  Philippe Coussot,et al.  Direct Determination of Rheological Characteristics of Debris Flow , 2000 .

[14]  J. N. Hutchinson,et al.  A review of the classification of landslides of the flow type , 2001 .

[15]  R. Iverson,et al.  U. S. Geological Survey , 1967, Radiocarbon.

[16]  Michael Dumbser,et al.  A new 3D parallel SPH scheme for free surface flows , 2009 .

[17]  Holger Wendland,et al.  Piecewise polynomial, positive definite and compactly supported radial functions of minimal degree , 1995, Adv. Comput. Math..

[18]  Guirong Liu,et al.  Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics: A Meshfree Particle Method , 2003 .

[19]  M. Naaim,et al.  Numerical simulations of granular free-surface flows using smoothed particle hydrodynamics , 2011 .

[20]  Mohamed Naaim,et al.  SPH-based numerical investigation of mudflow and other complex fluid flow interactions with structures , 2007 .

[21]  W. Benz,et al.  Applications of Smooth Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) to astrophysical problems , 1987 .

[22]  Joe J. Monaghan,et al.  SPH simulations of swimming linked bodies , 2008, J. Comput. Phys..

[23]  T. Papanastasiou.  Flows of Materials with Yield , 1987 .

[24]  Philippe Coussot,et al.  Numerical modeling of mudflows , 1997 .

[25]  Gui-Rong Liu,et al.  Restoring particle consistency in smoothed particle hydrodynamics , 2006 .

[26]  Guirong Liu,et al.  Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH): an Overview and Recent Developments , 2010 .

[27]  Richard M. Iverson,et al.  The perfect debris flow? Aggregated results from 28 large-scale experiments , 2010 .

[28]  Thorsten Pöschel,et al.  Computational Granular Dynamics , 2005 .

[29]  Philippe Coussot,et al.  Recognition, classification and mechanical description of debris flows , 1996 .

[30]  Paul W. Cleary,et al.  Modelling confined multi-material heat and mass flows using SPH , 1998 .

[31]  Philippe Coussot,et al.  Steady, laminar, flow of concentrated mud suspensions in open channel , 1994 .

[32]  J. Monaghan.  Smoothed particle hydrodynamics , 2005 .

[33]  F. James.  Statistical Methods in Experimental Physics , 1973 .

[34]  S. Miyama,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Viscous Flow by Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics , 1994 .

[35]  J. Monaghan,et al.  Shock simulation by the particle method SPH , 1983 .

[36]  J. Morris,et al.  Modeling Low Reynolds Number Incompressible Flows Using SPH , 1997 .