Computational modelling for congenital heart disease: how far are we from clinical translation?

Computational models of congenital heart disease (CHD) have become increasingly sophisticated over the last 20 years. They can provide an insight into complex flow phenomena, allow for testing devices into patient-specific anatomies (pre-CHD or post-CHD repair) and generate predictive data. This has been applied to different CHD scenarios, including patients with single ventricle, tetralogy of Fallot, aortic coarctation and transposition of the great arteries. Patient-specific simulations have been shown to be informative for preprocedural planning in complex cases, allowing for virtual stent deployment. Novel techniques such as statistical shape modelling can further aid in the morphological assessment of CHD, risk stratification of patients and possible identification of new ‘shape biomarkers’. Cardiovascular statistical shape models can provide valuable insights into phenomena such as ventricular growth in tetralogy of Fallot, or morphological aortic arch differences in repaired coarctation. In a constant move towards more realistic simulations, models can also account for multiscale phenomena (eg, thrombus formation) and importantly include measures of uncertainty (ie, CIs around simulation results). While their potential to aid understanding of CHD, surgical/procedural decision-making and personalisation of treatments is undeniable, important elements are still lacking prior to clinical translation of computational models in the field of CHD, that is, large validation studies, cost-effectiveness evaluation and establishing possible improvements in patient outcomes.

[1]  Whole Grain Label Statements Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff , 2006 .

[2]  S. Korones,et al.  Congenital Heart Disease in 56,109 Births Incidence and Natural History , 1971, Circulation.

[3]  Alejandro F. Frangi,et al.  A High-Resolution Atlas and Statistical Model of the Human Heart From Multislice CT , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  Pablo Lamata,et al.  Preterm Heart in Adult Life: Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Reveals Distinct Differences in Left Ventricular Mass, Geometry, and Function , 2012, Circulation.

[5]  J. Gorman,et al.  Three-dimensional ultrasound-derived physical mitral valve modeling. , 2014, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[6]  Alejandro F Frangi,et al.  Computational cardiac atlases: from patient to population and back , 2009, Experimental physiology.

[7]  Maxime Sermesant,et al.  A statistical shape modelling framework to extract 3D shape biomarkers from medical imaging data: assessing arch morphology of repaired coarctation of the aorta , 2016, BMC Medical Imaging.

[8]  Gabriel Acevedo-Bolton,et al.  Human Cardiac Function Simulator for the Optimal Design of a Novel Annuloplasty Ring with a Sub-valvular Element for Correction of Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation , 2015, Cardiovascular engineering and technology.

[9]  S. Deutsch,et al.  Hemodynamics in a Pediatric Ascending Aorta Using a Viscoelastic Pediatric Blood Model , 2015, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  X. Y. Xu,et al.  Modelling in congenital heart disease. Art or science? , 2009, International journal of cardiology.

[11]  Alistair A. Young,et al.  The Cardiac Atlas Project—an imaging database for computational modeling and statistical atlases of the heart , 2011, Bioinform..

[12]  R Fumero,et al.  A numerical fluid mechanical study of repaired congenital heart defects. Application to the total cavopulmonary connection. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  The Use of Active Shape Models for Locating Structures in Medical Images , 1993, IPMI.

[14]  Cristian Lorenz,et al.  A comprehensive shape model of the heart , 2006, Medical Image Anal..

[15]  Jos Vander Sloten,et al.  Statistical Shape Modeling and Population Analysis of the Aortic Root of TAVI Patients , 2013 .

[16]  Maxime Sermesant,et al.  A Non-parametric Statistical Shape Model for Assessment of the Surgically Repaired Aortic Arch in Coarctation of the Aorta: How Normal is Abnormal? , 2015, STACOM@MICCAI.

[17]  A. Taylor,et al.  Patient-specific computational models to support interventional procedures: a case study of complex aortic re-coarctation. , 2015, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[18]  A. Taylor,et al.  First-in-man implantation of a novel percutaneous valve: a new approach to medical device development. , 2010, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[19]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  Policy needs and options for a common approach towards modelling and simulation of human physiology and diseases with a focus on the virtual physiological human. , 2011, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[20]  Charles A. Taylor,et al.  Morphometry-Based Impedance Boundary Conditions for Patient-Specific Modeling of Blood Flow in Pulmonary Arteries , 2007, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  Pablo Lamata,et al.  Computational mesh as a descriptor of left ventricular shape for clinical diagnosis , 2013, Computing in Cardiology 2013.

[22]  F. Pluchinotta,et al.  Echocardiographic Assessment after Surgical Repair of Tetralogy of Fallot , 2015, Front. Pediatr..

[23]  A. Taylor,et al.  Patient‐specific finite element models to support clinical decisions: A lesson learnt from a case study of percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation , 2015, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[24]  Vartan Kurtcuoglu,et al.  Patient-Specific Surgical Planning, Where Do We Stand? The Example of the Fontan Procedure , 2015, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[25]  Damian Craiem,et al.  Identifying the Principal Modes of Variation in Human Thoracic Aorta Morphology , 2014, Journal of thoracic imaging.

[26]  Steven Deutsch,et al.  Multilaboratory particle image velocimetry analysis of the FDA benchmark nozzle model to support validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations. , 2011, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[27]  Jerrold E. Marsden,et al.  Study of blood flow impact on growth of thrombi using a multiscale model , 2009 .

[28]  A. Yoganathan,et al.  Comparing Pre- and Post-operative Fontan Hemodynamic Simulations: Implications for the Reliability of Surgical Planning , 2012, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[29]  C. A. Figueroa,et al.  Patient-Specific Image-Based Computational Modeling in Congenital Heart Disease: A Clinician Perspective , 2015 .

[30]  Philipp Bonhoeffer Are animal experiments the crux for decision making in whether new heart valves can be brought to clinical practice? , 2010, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[31]  A. Marsden,et al.  Computational modeling and engineering in pediatric and congenital heart disease , 2015, Current opinion in pediatrics.

[32]  Hervé Delingette,et al.  A Statistical Model for Quantification and Prediction of Cardiac Remodelling: Application to Tetralogy of Fallot , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[33]  Charles A. Taylor,et al.  Computational simulations for aortic coarctation: representative results from a sampling of patients. , 2011, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[34]  G. Biglino,et al.  Using 4D Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Validate Computational Fluid Dynamics: A Case Study , 2015, Front. Pediatr..

[35]  Claudio Chiastra,et al.  Biomechanical Modeling to Improve Coronary Artery Bifurcation Stenting: Expert Review Document on Techniques and Clinical Implementation. , 2015, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[36]  A. Gilchrist Congenital Heart Disease , 1948, Edinburgh medical journal.

[37]  M. Caputo,et al.  Non coding RNAs in aortic aneurysmal disease , 2015, Front. Genet..

[38]  Charles A. Taylor,et al.  A Computational Framework for Fluid-Solid-Growth Modeling in Cardiovascular Simulations. , 2009, Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering.

[39]  Alistair A. Young,et al.  Extraction and quantification of left ventricular deformation modes , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[40]  A. Marsden,et al.  Flow simulations and validation for the first cohort of patients undergoing the Y-graft Fontan procedure. , 2015, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[41]  Philipp Beerbaum,et al.  Systemic-to-pulmonary collateral flow in patients with palliated univentricular heart physiology: measurement using cardiovascular magnetic resonance 4D velocity acquisition , 2012, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[42]  Milan Sonka,et al.  Congenital aortic disease: 4D magnetic resonance segmentation and quantitative analysis , 2009, Medical Image Anal..

[43]  A. Marsden,et al.  An integrated approach to patient-specific predictive modeling for single ventricle heart palliation , 2014, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[44]  R Pietrabissa,et al.  Use of computational fluid dynamics in the design of surgical procedures: application to the study of competitive flows in cavo-pulmonary connections. , 1996, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[45]  I E Vignon-Clementel,et al.  Uncertainty quantification in virtual surgery hemodynamics predictions for single ventricle palliation , 2016, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.

[46]  R. Burrow,et al.  Heart , 2013, Feline Soft Tissue and General Surgery.

[47]  Michael Markl,et al.  Valve-Related Hemodynamics Mediate Human Bicuspid Aortopathy: Insights From Wall Shear Stress Mapping. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.