The Armeo Spring as training tool to improve upper limb functionality in multiple sclerosis: a pilot study

BackgroundFew research in multiple sclerosis (MS) has focused on physical rehabilitation of upper limb dysfunction, though the latter strongly influences independent performance of activities of daily living. Upper limb rehabilitation technology could hold promise for complementing traditional MS therapy. Consequently, this pilot study aimed to examine the feasibility of an 8-week mechanical-assisted training program for improving upper limb muscle strength and functional capacity in MS patients with evident paresis.MethodsA case series was applied, with provision of a training program (3×/week, 30 minutes/session), supplementary on the customary maintaining care, by employing a gravity-supporting exoskeleton apparatus (Armeo Spring). Ten high-level disability MS patients (Expanded Disability Status Scale 7.0-8.5) actively performed task-oriented movements in a virtual real-life-like learning environment with the affected upper limb. Tests were administered before and after training, and at 2-month follow-up. Muscle strength was determined through the Motricity Index and Jamar hand-held dynamometer. Functional capacity was assessed using the TEMPA, Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) and 9-Hole Peg Test (9HPT).ResultsMuscle strength did not change significantly. Significant gains were particularly found in functional capacity tests. After training completion, TEMPA scores improved (p = 0.02), while a trend towards significance was found for the 9HPT (p = 0.05). At follow-up, the TEMPA as well as ARAT showed greater improvement relative to baseline than after the 8-week intervention period (p = 0.01, p = 0.02 respectively).ConclusionsThe results of present pilot study suggest that upper limb functionality of high-level disability MS patients can be positively influenced by means of a technology-enhanced physical rehabilitation program.

[1]  R. Hetherington.  The Shellen chart as a test of visual acuity , 1954, Psychologische Forschung.

[2]  E. Pfeiffer.  A Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire for the Assessment of Organic Brain Deficit in Elderly Patients † , 1975, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[3]  R. Magill.  Motor Learning And Control , 1980 .

[4]  R. Lyle.  A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research , 1981, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[5]  J. Kurtzke.  Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis , 1983, Neurology.

[6]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. , 1987, Physical therapy.

[7]  D. Wade,et al.  Assessing motor impairment after stroke: a pilot reliability study. , 1990, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[8]  B Pentland,et al.  Rater reliability of Fahn's tremor rating scale in patients with multiple sclerosis. , 1998, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[9]  S. Reingold,et al.  The Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite measure (MSFC): an integrated approach to MS clinical outcome assessment , 1999, Multiple sclerosis.

[10]  A. Compston,et al.  Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines from the international panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis , 2001, Annals of neurology.

[11]  S. Black,et al.  The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery after Stroke: A Critical Review of Its Measurement Properties , 2002, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[12]  M. T. J. Buñuales,et al.  La clasificación internacional del funcionamiento de la discapacidad y de la salud (CIF) 2001 , 2002 .

[13]  P Ketelaer,et al.  Validity of the TEMPA for the measurement of upper limb function in multiple sclerosis , 2002, Clinical rehabilitation.

[14]  R. Magill.  Motor learning and control : concepts and applications , 2004 .

[15]  Peter Langhorne,et al.  Effects of Augmented Exercise Therapy Time After Stroke: A Meta-Analysis , 2004, Stroke.

[16]  G. Chard.  International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health , 2004 .

[17]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence? , 2004, Clinical rehabilitation.

[18]  J. Liu,et al.  Monitoring functional arm movement for home-based therapy after stroke , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[19]  L. Ada,et al.  Chapter 5 – Changing the way we view the contribution of motor impairments to physical disability after stroke , 2005 .

[20]  D. Newham,et al.  Science based rehabilitation - Theories into practice , 2005 .

[21]  Kathryn M. Refshauge,et al.  Science-based rehabilitation : theories into practice , 2005 .

[22]  N. Yozbatiran,et al.  Motor assessment of upper extremity function and its relation with fatigue, cognitive function and quality of life in multiple sclerosis patients , 2006, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[23]  D.J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Automating Arm Movement Training Following Severe Stroke: Functional Exercises With Quantitative Feedback in a Gravity-Reduced Environment , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[24]  Jan Hillert,et al.  High concurrent presence of disability in multiple sclerosis , 2007, Journal of Neurology.

[25]  C. Lucchinetti,et al.  The Pathology of MS: New Insights and Potential Clinical Applications , 2007, The neurologist.

[26]  G. Nagels,et al.  Measuring Activity Patterns Using Actigraphy in Multiple Sclerosis , 2007, Chronobiology international.

[27]  H Nazirah,et al.  THE APPLICATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH (ICF) BY WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION(WHO) IN REHABILITATION MEDICINE PRACTICE , 2007 .

[28]  E. Leskinen,et al.  Measures of physical functioning predict self-reported performance in self-care, mobility, and domestic life in ambulatory persons with multiple sclerosis. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[29]  M Filippi,et al.  Altered functional and structural connectivities in patients with MS , 2007, Neurology.

[30]  J. Dewald,et al.  Impact of gravity loading on post‐stroke reaching and its relationship to weakness , 2007, Muscle & nerve.

[31]  L. von Koch,et al.  Variations in functioning and disability in multiple sclerosis , 2008, Journal of Neurology.

[32]  T. Platz,et al.  Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving arm function and activities of daily living after stroke. , 2008, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[33]  E. Taub,et al.  Constraint-Induced Movement therapy can improve hemiparetic progressive multiple sclerosis. Preliminary findings , 2008, Multiple sclerosis.

[34]  H. Krebs,et al.  Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy on Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[35]  A. Timmermans,et al.  Technology-assisted training of arm-hand skills in stroke: concepts on reacquisition of motor control and therapist guidelines for rehabilitation technology design , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[36]  Maura Casadio,et al.  Abnormal sensorimotor control, but intact force field adaptation, in multiple sclerosis subjects with no clinical disability , 2008, Multiple sclerosis.

[37]  T. Ingemann-Hansen,et al.  Review: Multiple sclerosis and physical exercise: recommendations for the application of resistance-, endurance- and combined training , 2008, Multiple sclerosis.

[38]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Intensive Sensorimotor Arm Training Mediated by Therapist or Robot Improves Hemiparesis in Patients With Chronic Stroke , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[39]  F. Schmidt.  Meta-Analysis , 2008 .

[40]  E. Tunik,et al.  Sensorimotor training in virtual reality: a review. , 2009, NeuroRehabilitation.

[41]  Chris Raymaekers,et al.  Arm training in Multiple Sclerosis using Phantom: Clinical relevance of robotic outcome measures , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[42]  Sarah J. Housman,et al.  A Randomized Controlled Trial of Gravity-Supported, Computer-Enhanced Arm Exercise for Individuals With Severe Hemiparesis , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[43]  Robert W. Motl,et al.  Effect of Exercise Training on Walking Mobility in Multiple Sclerosis: A Meta-Analysis , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[44]  L. Moja,et al.  Constraint-induced movement therapy for upper extremities in stroke patients. , 2009, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[45]  A. Timmermans,et al.  Arm and hand skills: Training preferences after stroke , 2009, Disability and rehabilitation.

[46]  Valentina Squeri,et al.  Adaptive robot training for the treatment of incoordination in Multiple Sclerosis , 2010, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[47]  Ilaria Carpinella,et al.  Robot-based rehabilitation of the upper limbs in multiple sclerosis: feasibility and preliminary results. , 2009, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.