An Analysis of Interrelationships between Project Management and Student-Experience Constructs

This article seeks to explore, through the utilization of correlational analysis, how the parameters that impact the student experience may be interrelated. We found that the experiences of students studying project management appear to be heavily influenced by e-resource provisions and the actual experiences that the students are subjected to when using virtual learning environments (VLEs). These findings support previous research acknowledging that information and communications technology (ICT) plays an important role in teaching and learning project management. Students’ experience of interpersonal skills also correlated uniquely and significantly with other constructs, supporting the premise that learning is integral to the development of interpersonal skills. Discussion surrounds the interdependency of student experiences adding to their learning and how future research should consider larger and more diverse samples to establish exactly what constructs detract and/or add to their learning in project management, which could then contribute to pedagogical discourse in other disciplines.

[1]  Bassam Baroudi,et al.  Project management education: The human skills imperative , 2008 .

[2]  Jonas Söderlund,et al.  Rethinking project management education : Social twists and knowledge co-production , 2008 .

[3]  Francis Tekyi Edum-Fotwe,et al.  Developing project management competency: perspectives from the construction industry , 2000 .

[4]  Thomas Mengel,et al.  Outcome-based project management education for emerging leaders – A case study of teaching and learning project management , 2008 .

[5]  Marilyn J. Bruin,et al.  Differences in Spending Habits and Credit Use of College Students , 2000 .

[6]  R. Ellis,et al.  Quality in blended learning: Exploring the relationships between on-line and face-to-face teaching and learning , 2007, Internet High. Educ..

[7]  Arthur D. Tullett The adaptive—innovative (A—I) cognitive styles of male and female project managers: Some implications for the management of change , 1995 .

[8]  D. Treagust,et al.  Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning , 2003 .

[9]  Jonas Söderlund,et al.  Lagomizing, Organic Integration, and Systems Emergency Wards: Innovative Practices in Managing Complex Systems Development Projects , 2008 .

[10]  David Kember,et al.  Development of a questionnaire for assessing students’ perceptions of the teaching and learning environment and its use in quality assurance , 2009 .

[11]  Paul R. Trowler,et al.  Freeing the chi of change: the Higher Education Academy and enhancing teaching and learning in higher education , 2005 .

[12]  Janice Thomas,et al.  Deconstructing project management: a gender analysis of project management guidelines , 2003 .

[13]  Terri S. Fiez,et al.  Enhancing the freshman and sophomore ECE student experience using a platform for learning™ , 2003, IEEE Trans. Educ..

[14]  Brian Hobbs,et al.  Governance and Support in the Sponsoring of Projects and Programs , 2008 .

[15]  Harry L. Reif,et al.  How university professors teach project management for information systems , 2005, CACM.

[16]  Susan D. Urban,et al.  A cooperative learning approach to database group projects: integrating theory and practice , 1998 .

[17]  Francis T. Hartman,et al.  Preparing the mind for dynamic management , 2008 .

[18]  Dov Dvir,et al.  Projects and Project Managers: The Relationship between Project Managers' Personality, Project Types, and Project Success , 2006 .

[19]  James S. Collofello University/industry collaboration in developing a simulation-based software project management training course , 2000, IEEE Trans. Educ..

[20]  Peter Y. Chen,et al.  Correlation: Parametric and Nonparametric Measures , 2002 .

[21]  S. Cartwright,et al.  Project management: different gender, different culture? , 1995 .

[22]  David Kember,et al.  An examination of the interrelationships between workload, study time, learning approaches and academic outcomes , 1996 .

[23]  D. Gruenewald The Best of Both Worlds: A Critical Pedagogy of Place , 2003 .

[24]  Miguel-Ángel Sicilia,et al.  e-Learning in Project Management Using Simulation Models: A Case Study Based on the Replication of an Experiment , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[25]  Stephen Wearne,et al.  Stakeholders in excellence in teaching and learning of project management , 2008 .

[26]  Roger Atkinson,et al.  Excellence in teaching and learning for project management , 2006 .

[27]  Mayer N. Zald,et al.  Spinning Disciplines: Critical Management Studies in the Context of the Transformation of Management Education , 2002 .

[28]  Richard A. Bettis,et al.  Changes in Graduate Management Education and New Business School Strategies for the 21st Century , 2003 .

[29]  D. Kember Interpreting Student Workload and the Factors Which Shape Students' Perceptions of Their Workload. , 2004 .

[30]  T. Kitamura,et al.  One‐year prevalence and incidence of depression among first‐year university students in Japan: A preliminary study , 2000, Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences.

[31]  Luisa M. Regueras,et al.  Effects of Competitive E-Learning Tools on Higher Education Students: A Case Study , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[32]  Ron Oliver,et al.  Curriculum and Learning-Resources Issues Arising From the Use of Web-Based Course Support Systems , 1999 .

[33]  Helgi Thor Ingason,et al.  Contemporary Knowledge and Skill Requirements in Project Management , 2009 .

[34]  L. Cronbach Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[35]  D. Kolb,et al.  Learning Styles and Adaptive Flexibility , 2002 .

[36]  J. Wong,et al.  Web-Based Survey of Depression, Anxiety and Stress in First-Year Tertiary Education Students in Hong Kong , 2006, The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry.

[37]  Fadi P. Deek,et al.  Innovation and education in the digital age: reconciling the roles of pedagogy, technology, and the business of learning , 2003, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[38]  Mark Winter,et al.  Directions for future research in project management: The main findings of a UK government-funded research network , 2006 .

[39]  Chetan S. Sankar,et al.  Teaching Project Management through an Information Technology-Based Method , 1998 .

[40]  B. Gerard Doornekamp,et al.  Students valuation of the use of computers in education , 1993 .

[41]  David Kember,et al.  Learning approaches, study time and academic performance , 1995 .

[42]  Dante Del Corso,et al.  A teacher friendly environment to foster learner-centered customization in the development of interactive educational packages , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[43]  A. McCulloch The student as co‐producer: learning from public administration about the student–university relationship , 2009 .

[44]  Peter Cuthbert,et al.  Managing service quality in HE: is SERVQUAL the answer? Part 1 , 1996 .

[45]  Robert A. Ellis,et al.  Learning Through Benchmarking: Developing a Relational, Prospective Approach to Benchmarking ICT in Learning and Teaching , 2006 .

[46]  Thomas Li-Ping Tang,et al.  Students' perceptions of teaching technologies, application of technologies, and academic performance , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[47]  M. Sankaran,et al.  Student Experience with Interactive Computer Programs for Linear Circuit Design , 1969 .

[48]  Neil Selwyn,et al.  Students' attitudes toward computers: Validation of a computer attitude scale for 16-19 education , 1997, Comput. Educ..

[49]  P. Ainley The varieties of student experience – an open research question and some ways to answer it , 2008 .