A fuzzy expert system for evaluating human observers in a visual detection task

The Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) method has been successfully used to evaluate the performance of human observers in visual detection and discrimination tasks, to quantitatively assess image quality and to evaluate imaging systems. In this work, we present a Fuzzy Expert System to facilitate the discrimination of the performance of human observers in a visual detection task. To reduce the complexity of our system, we implemented it using two Fuzzy Subsystems in cascade in order to combine the effect of our input variables. We used the performance indexes dk and p(a) of ROC theory to define the input and output variables of 30 empirical cases and 23 synthetic ones.We compared the dkd index (the output of our expert system) with dk and found that both were similar for the cases of average performance. However, we found significant advantages when our system was applied to analyze the poor and good performance cases, which is important for several applications. Our system was developed to analyze data of ROC rating experiments using four categories, but can easily be adapted to analyze data of rating experiments using more categories or data of Multiple Alternative Forced Choice (MAFC) experiments.

[1]  John A. Swets,et al.  Factors affecting the slope of empirical ROC curves: Comparison of binary and rating responses , 1967 .

[2]  Michio Sugeno,et al.  A fuzzy-logic-based approach to qualitative modeling , 1993, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[3]  Bart Kosko,et al.  Fuzzy Engineering , 1996 .

[4]  Arthur E. Burgess On Sampling Statistics In Observer Performance Studies , 1989, Other Conferences.

[5]  A. Burgess Comparison of receiver operating characteristic and forced choice observer performance measurement methods. , 1995, Medical physics.

[6]  James P. Egan,et al.  Signal detection theory and ROC analysis , 1975 .

[7]  A E Burgess,et al.  Visual signal detection. IV. Observer inconsistency. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[8]  C. Metz ROC Methodology in Radiologic Imaging , 1986, Investigative radiology.

[9]  James C. Bezdek,et al.  Fuzzy models—What are they, and why? [Editorial] , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[10]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[11]  H H Barrett,et al.  Objective assessment of image quality: effects of quantum noise and object variability. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[12]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[13]  A Burgess,et al.  Image quality, the ideal observer, and human performance of radiologic decision tasks. , 1995, Academic radiology.

[14]  Bart Kosko,et al.  Neural networks and fuzzy systems , 1998 .

[15]  John A. Swets,et al.  Signal Detection Theory and ROC Analysis in Psychology and Diagnostics: Collected Papers , 1996 .

[16]  J. Swets Signal detection and recognition by human observers : contemporary readings , 1964 .

[17]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Human Performance , 1984 .

[18]  H. Hake,et al.  Visual discrimination, and interpretation in terms of detectability theory. , 1962, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[19]  Abraham Kandel,et al.  Fuzzy Expert Systems , 1991 .