Two rovers to the same site on Mars, 2018: possibilities for cooperative science.

Within the framework of the proposed joint NASA/ ESA 2018 mission to Mars, the 2-Rover International Science Analysis Group (2R-iSAG) committee was convened by the Mars Exploration Program Analysis Group (MEPAG) to evaluate the potential for incremental science return through the simultaneous operation at the same landing site of two rovers, specifically, ESA’s ExoMars and a NASA-sourced rover concept designated here as MAX-C (Mars Astrobiology Explorer-Cacher). The group was asked to consider collaborative science opportunities from two perspectives: (1) no change to either rover and (2) some change allowed. As presently planned and envisioned, the ExoMars and MAX-C rovers would have complementary scientific objectives and payloads. Initiated in 2002 and currently approved for launch in 2018, ESA’s ExoMars has the following scientific objectives: (1) to search for signs of past and present life and (2) to characterize the subsurface in terms of its physical structure, the presence of water/ice, and its geochemistry. The payload selected to achieve these goals is centered on the ability to obtain samples from the subsurface with a 2 m drill. The payload comprises panoramic and high-resolution cameras and a close-up imager (microscope) as well as a ground-penetrating radar to characterize the surface and subsurface environment and to choose relevant sites for drilling. Infrared spectroscopy would provide downhole mineralogy, while the mineralogy of the drilled materials would be obtained by IR/Raman spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction. Laser desorption–gas chromatography–mass spectrometry and pyrolysis gas chromatography–mass spectrometry would determine the composition of organic molecules, including any chiral preference in molecular structure. A life marker chip is designed to detect and identify markers of fossil or extant life. The currently proposed objectives of MAX-C are to cache suitable samples from well-characterized sites that might contain evidence of past life and prebiotic chemistry in preparation for a possible future Mars Sample Return (MSR) mission. The emphasis is on detailed site evaluation to determine the potential for past habitability and preservation of physical and chemical biosignatures. The strawman payload (which has not been selected) is therefore likely to include instrumentation for surface characterization, for example: an abrading tool; a 5 cm drill; a panoramic camera and near-IR spectrometer; a set of armmounted instruments capable of interrogating the abraded surfaces by creating co-registered 2-D maps of visual texture, major element geochemistry, mineralogy, and organic geochemistry; and a rock core acquisition, encapsulation, and caching system. The value of collaborative activity can only be judged with respect to a stated scientific objective. To this end, the previously stated objectives of ExoMars and MAX-C as independent entities have been analyzed for significant common aspects. We conclude that these two rovers have two crucial shared objectives that could, in fact, form the basis of highly significant collaborative exploration activity. We therefore propose the following set of shared scientific objectives for a 2018 dual rover mission that consists of both a shared component and an independent component.

[1]  David W. Beaty,et al.  Science Priorities for Mars Sample Return , 2008 .

[2]  Raymond E. Arvidson,et al.  Athena Mars rover science investigation : Mars exploration rover mission and landing sites , 2003 .

[3]  Carol R. Stoker,et al.  Overview of the Mars Pathfinder Mission: Launch through landing, surface operations, data sets, and science results , 1999 .

[4]  Andrew P. Ingersoll,et al.  The Mars Atmospheric Constellation Observatory (MACO) Concept , 2004 .

[5]  Nicolas Thomas,et al.  An ESA study for the search for life on Mars , 2000 .

[6]  Juergen Leitner,et al.  A survey of multi-robot cooperation in space , 2009 .

[7]  Edward Tunstel,et al.  Planetary Rover Developments Supporting Mars Exploration, Sample Return and Future Human-Robotic Colonization , 2003, Auton. Robots.

[8]  Paul Mahaffy,et al.  Science priorities for Mars sample return. , 2008, Astrobiology.

[9]  Tetsuya Tokano,et al.  Water on Mars and Life , 2005 .

[10]  Francesc J. Ferri,et al.  The NetLander geophysical network on the surface of Mars: General , 2002 .

[11]  Carol R. Stoker,et al.  Two dogs, new tricks: A two‐rover mission simulation using K9 and FIDO at Black Rock Summit, Nevada , 2002 .

[12]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  Coordinated multi-robot exploration , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[13]  Carol R. Stoker,et al.  Astrobiology and habitability studies in preparation for future Mars missions: trends from investigating minerals, organics and biota , 2011, International Journal of Astrobiology.

[14]  Terrance L. Huntsberger,et al.  Behavior-based multi-robot collaboration for autonomous construction tasks , 2005, 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[15]  Alfred S. McEwen,et al.  The Mars Astrobiology Explorer-Cacher (MAX-C): a potential Rover Mission for 2018 , 2010 .

[16]  I.A.D. Nesnas,et al.  Axel Mobility Platform for Steep Terrain Excursions and Sampling on Planetary Surfaces , 2008, 2008 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[17]  John P. Grotzinger,et al.  Water on Mars and the Prospect of Martian Life , 2006 .

[18]  Linda Neuman Ezell,et al.  On Mars: Exploration of the Red Planet 1958-1978 , 1986 .

[19]  Mary A. Voytek,et al.  Findings of the Mars special regions science analysis group. , 2006, Astrobiology.

[20]  The Mars Astrobiology Explorer-Cacher (MAX-C): a potential rover mission for 2018. Final report of the Mars Mid-Range Rover Science Analysis Group (MRR-SAG) October 14, 2009. , 2010, Astrobiology.

[21]  Jean-Pierre Lebreton,et al.  The Cassini/Huygens Mission to the Saturnian System , 1999 .

[22]  R. Mitcheltree,et al.  Mars Science Laboratory entry, descent, and landing system , 2006, 2006 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[23]  David K. Geller,et al.  Navigating the Road to Autonomous Orbital Rendezvous , 2007 .

[24]  G. Southam 10.12 – Geology, Life and Habitability , 2007 .

[25]  D. Plettemeier,et al.  The Comet Nucleus Sounding Experiment by Radiowave Transmission (CONSERT): A Short Description of the Instrument and of the Commissioning Stages , 2007 .

[26]  Jean-Pierre Lebreton,et al.  An overview of the descent and landing of the Huygens probe on Titan , 2005, Nature.

[27]  Douglas W. Ming,et al.  Lunar Surface Operations with Dual Rovers , 2010 .

[28]  Frances Westall,et al.  3 Early Life on Earth and Analogies to Mars , 2005 .

[29]  Tori M Hoehler,et al.  An energy balance concept for habitability. , 2007, Astrobiology.

[30]  Nicolas Thomas,et al.  An integrated exobiology package for the search for life on Mars , 1999 .