An assessment of the use of Implanon® in three community services

Aims The aims of the study were three-fold, namely to assess continuation rates with Implanon® fitted in clients from three contraception and sexual health services; to identify factors associated with early removal of Implanon®; and to assess clinician compliance with recommended practice in counselling and insertion. Methods Retrospective review of client records, and comparison with audit criteria. Postal survey. Main findings One hundred and ninety women had Implanon® inserted in the study period. Continuation rates were between 84% and 88% at 6 months and 67% and 78% at 12 months. There were no pregnancies or procedure complications. The main reasons for removal were identified as intolerance of recognised side effects or a change of mind about wanting contraception. Younger women were more likely to have the device removed early. There was evidence of excellent or good recording of many criteria for best practice in counselling and insertion. The assessment highlighted certain issues around counselling and insertion that services needed to consider further. Conclusions The three services have been reassured that they are providing a good standard of care to clients requesting Implanon® and that their 'real life' 6- and 12-month continuation rates are reasonable.

[1]  A. Glasier Implantable contraceptives for women: effectiveness, discontinuation rates, return of fertility, and outcome of pregnancies. , 2002, Contraception.

[2]  M. Hickey,et al.  Vaginal bleeding disturbances and implantable contraceptives. , 2002, Contraception.

[3]  A. Faúndes,et al.  Nonmenstrual adverse events during use of implantable contraceptives for women: data from clinical trials. , 2002, Contraception.

[4]  H. Croxatto Clinical profile of Implanon®: a single-rod etonogestrel contraceptive implant , 2000, The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception.

[5]  Croxatto Hb Clinical profile of Implanon: a single-rod etonogestrel contraceptive implant. , 2000 .

[6]  E. Oloto,et al.  Subdermal contraceptive implants , 2000, British Journal of Family Planning.

[7]  H. C. Coelingh Bennink,et al.  A multicentre efficacy and safety study of the single contraceptive implant Implanon. Implanon Study Group. , 1999, Human reproduction.

[8]  J. Edwards,et al.  Implanon. A review of clinical studies. , 1999, The British journal of family planning.

[9]  L. Mascarenhas Insertion and removal of Implanon. , 1998, Contraception.

[10]  H. Croxatto,et al.  The pharmacodynamics and efficacy of Implanon. An overview of the data. , 1998, Contraception.

[11]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Practical statistics for medical research , 1990 .

[12]  V. Sarma PAEDIATRIC AND ADOLESCENT GYNAECOLOGY. , 1965, The Indian practitioner.

[13]  D.,et al.  Regression Models and Life-Tables , 2022 .