REGIONAL GRADIENT ANALYSIS AND SPATIAL PATTERN OF WOODY PLANT COMMUNITIES OF OREGON FORESTS

Knowledge of regional-scale patterns of ecological community structure, and of fac- tors that control them, is largely conceptual. Regional- and local-scale factors associated with re- gional variation in community composition have not been quantified. We analyzed data on woody plant species abundance from 2443 field plots across natural and seminatural forests and woodlands of Oregon to identify and quantify environmental, biotic, and disturbance factors associated with regional gradients of woody species composition; to examine how these factors change with scale (geographic extent) and location; and to characterize and map geographic patterns of species and environmental gradients. Environmental correlates of species gradients, species diversity patterns, and the spatial pattern- ing of woody plant communities varied with geographic extent and location. Total variation ex- plained (TVE) by canonical correspondence analyses (CCAs) was 9-15% at three hierarchical geo- graphic extents: the entire state, two half-states, and five subregions. Our high level of unexplained species variation is typical of vegetation gradient analyses, which has been attributed to landscape effects, stochastic processes, and unpredictable historical events. In addition; we found that TVE in canonical correspondence analysis is confounded by sample size. Large numbers of plots and spe- cies, as in our study, are associated with lower TVEs, and we propose a; mechanism for this phenom- enon. Climate contributed most to TVE (46-60%) at all locations and extents, followed by geology (11-19%), disturbance (6-12%), and topography (4-8%). Seasonal variability and extremes in climate were more important in explaining species gradients than were mean annual climatic conditions. In addition, species gradients were more strongly associated with climatic conditions during the grow- ing season than in winter. The dominant gradient at the state scale was from the lower elevation, moderate, maritime climate ,along the coast to the higher elevation, drier, continental climate of eastern Oregon. The second canonical axis followed a gradient from the warm, dry, growing seasons of the western interior valleys and eastern Cascade Range to the cooler, wetter mountainous areas. Geologic variables were most strongly correlated with axis 3, and measures of local site and distur- bance with axis 4. For most of the state, our findings on the associations of disturbance factors with species gradients were inconclusive due to confounding of land ownership patterns, disturbance histories, and elevation in our sample. Near the coast, where gradients were not confounded, clear-cutting and stand age accounted for only 2 and 1% of TVE, respectively, in partial CCA. Ordi- nations of our long, regional gradients were influenced more by species presence than by abundance, and few woody species have been totally eliminated from sites by clear-cutting. Within Oregon and for the range of geographic extents we examined, variation in the environ- mental correlates of species gradients was more strongly associated with geographic location than with geographic extent, although topographic factors explained slightly more variation at smaller geographic extents. The greatest subregional contrast in vegetation character was between eastern and northwestern Oregon, and the Klamath subregion was intermediate. In the drier climate of east- ern Oregon, community structure varied at a finer spatial scale, and climatic and topographic mois- ture were more strongly associated with species gradients than in the moister areas of western; Or- egon. Topographic effects were weakest, and climatic effects strongest near. the coast, where climate is moderate. Alpha and gamma diversity were greater in western Oregon, but beta diversity was greater in eastern Oregon and greater for shrubs than for. trees. Our findings supported a conceptual model of multiscaled controls on vegetation distribution, and the related notion that local community structure is the result of both regional- and local-scale processes. Despite strong ecological contrasts within the region, we were able to synthesize species-environment relations at the regional level. This suggests that apparent conflicts among local vegetation studies can be explained by real ecological differences among places

[1]  D. Marks,et al.  Daily air temperature interpolated at high spatial resolution over a large mountainous region , 1997 .

[2]  Charles B. Halpern,et al.  Plant Species Diversity in Natural and Managed Forests of the Pacific Northwest , 1995 .

[3]  C. Daly,et al.  A Statistical-Topographic Model for Mapping Climatological Precipitation over Mountainous Terrain , 1994 .

[4]  Rune Halvorsen Økland,et al.  Canonical Correspondence Analysis with variation partitioning: some comments and an application , 1994 .

[5]  M. Palmer PUTTING THINGS IN EVEN BETTER ORDER: THE ADVANTAGES OF CANONICAL CORRESPONDENCE ANALYSIS' , 1993 .

[6]  J. C. Hickman,et al.  The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California , 1993 .

[7]  D. MacCleery,et al.  Forest resources of the United States, 1992. Forest Service general technical report (Final) , 1993 .

[8]  Zhiliang Zhu,et al.  Forest resources of the United States, 1992. , 1993 .

[9]  P. Legendre,et al.  Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation , 1992 .

[10]  J. R. Runkle,et al.  Effect of Land Use Practices on Composition of Woodlot Vegetation in Greene County, Ohio , 1992 .

[11]  Frederick J. Swanson,et al.  CONSERVING BIODIVERSITY IN MANAGED FORESTS : LESSONS FROM NATURAL FORESTS , 1991 .

[12]  Scott L. Collins,et al.  Importance of Spatial and Temporal Dynamics in Species Regional Abundance and Distribution , 1991 .

[13]  A. Magurran Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement , 1988, Springer Netherlands.

[14]  A. M. Olson,et al.  Role of scale and environmental factors in regulation of community structure. , 1990, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[15]  Y. Hiratsuka,et al.  Early symptom development in lodgepole pine seedlings infected with Endocronartium harknessii , 1990 .

[16]  R. Knox,et al.  Putting Things in Order: The Advantages of Detrended Correspondence Analysis , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[17]  C. T. Dyrness,et al.  Natural Vegetation of Oregon and Washington , 1988 .

[18]  Frederick J. Swanson,et al.  Landform Effects on Ecosystem Patterns and Processes , 1988 .

[19]  David J. Currie,et al.  Large-scale biogeographical patterns of species richness of trees , 1987, Nature.

[20]  B. V. Barnes,et al.  Tree species distributions related to climatic patterns in Michigan , 1987 .

[21]  R. Ricklefs,et al.  Community Diversity: Relative Roles of Local and Regional Processes , 1987, Science.

[22]  C. Braak Canonical Correspondence Analysis: A New Eigenvector Technique for Multivariate Direct Gradient Analysis , 1986 .

[23]  Leonard A. Volland Plant associations of the central Oregon pumice zone , 1985 .

[24]  James H. Brown On the Relationship between Abundance and Distribution of Species , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[25]  Hugh G. Gauch,et al.  Multivariate analysis in community ecology , 1984 .

[26]  Ronald P. Neilson,et al.  Biogeography of two southwest American oaks in relation to atmospheric dynamics , 1983 .

[27]  Henry L. Gholz,et al.  Environmental Limits on Aboveground Net Primary Production, Leaf Area, and Biomass in Vegetation Zones of the Pacific Northwest , 1982 .

[28]  Peter J. Richerson,et al.  Patterns of Plant Species Diversity in California: Relation to Weather and Topography , 1980, The American Naturalist.

[29]  R. Daubenmire Plant Geography: With Special Reference to North America , 1980 .

[30]  R. Waring,et al.  Evergreen Coniferous Forests of the Pacific Northwest , 1979, Science.

[31]  R. Peet Latitudinal variation in southern Rocky Mountain forests , 1978 .

[32]  S. Running,et al.  Leaf Area of Mature Northwestern Coniferous Forests: Relation to Site Water Balance , 1977 .

[33]  Glenn M. Hawk,et al.  Relationships of Environment to Composition, Structure, and Diversity of Forest Communities of the Central Western Cascades of Oregon , 1976 .

[34]  Arthur Cronquist,et al.  Flora of the Pacific Northwest , 1974 .

[35]  R. Levins Some Demographic and Genetic Consequences of Environmental Heterogeneity for Biological Control , 1969 .

[36]  R. Fonda,et al.  Forest Vegetation of the Montane and Subalpine Zones, Olympic Mountains, Washington , 1969 .

[37]  飯塚 寛,et al.  Aspect transformation in site productivity research , 1967 .

[38]  Robert H. Whittaker,et al.  Vegetation of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona: A Gradient Analysis of the South Slope , 1965 .

[39]  R. H. Whittaker,et al.  Dominance and Diversity in Land Plant Communities , 1965, Science.

[40]  R. Waring,et al.  Some Vegetation of the California Coastal Redwood Region in Relation to Gradients of Moisture, Nutrients, Light, and Temperature , 1964 .

[41]  R. Whittaker Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California , 1960 .

[42]  J. Agee Fire Ecology of Pacific Northwest Forests , 1993 .

[43]  Dolph Schluter,et al.  Species diversity in ecological communities: historical and geographical perspectives. , 1993 .

[44]  Denis White,et al.  Cartographic and Geometric Components of a Global Sampling Design for Environmental Monitoring , 1992 .

[45]  Ronald P. Neilson,et al.  Regional and Local Vegetation Patterns: The Responses of Vegetation Diversity to Subcontinental Air Masses , 1992 .

[46]  J. Franklin,et al.  Foothill Oak Woodlands of the Interior Valleys of Southwestern Oregon , 1992 .

[47]  R. Peet,et al.  Gradient analysis of latitudinal variation in southern Rocky Mountain forests , 1991 .

[48]  T. Spies Plant species diversity and occurrence in young, mature, and old-growth Douglas-fir stands in western Oregon and Washington , 1991 .

[49]  R. Peet,et al.  Gradient analysis of forests of the Sangre de Cristo Range, Colorado. , 1990 .

[50]  C.J.F. ter Braak,et al.  CANOCO - a FORTRAN program for canonical community ordination by [partial] [etrended] [canonical] correspondence analysis, principal components analysis and redundancy analysis (version 2.1) , 1988 .

[51]  Hans-Hermann Bock,et al.  Classification and Related Methods of Data Analysis , 1988 .

[52]  Christopher Topik,et al.  Plant association and management guide for the ponderosa pine, Douglas-fir, and grand fir zones : Mount Hood National Forest , 1988 .

[53]  C.J.F. ter Braak,et al.  Partial canonical correspondence analysis , 1988 .

[54]  F. Woodward Climate and plant distribution , 1987 .

[55]  D. H. Knight,et al.  Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology , 1974 .

[56]  Jerry F. Franklin,et al.  A preliminary classification of forest communities in the central portion of the Western Cascades in Oregon. , 1974 .