The CIDOC CRM – an Ontological Approach to Semantic Interoperability of Metadata

This paper presents the methodology that has been successfully employed over the past 5 years by an interdisciplinary team to create the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model (CRM), a high-level ontology to enable information integration for cultural heritage data and their correlation with library and archive information. The CIDOC CRM is now in the process to become an ISO standard. The paper justifies in detail the methodology and design by functional requirements and gives examples of its contents. The CIDOC CRM analyses the common conceptualizations behind data and metadata structures to support data transformation, mediation and merging. It is argued that such ontologies are property-centric, in contrast to terminological systems, and should be built with different methodologies. It is demonstrated that ontological and epistemological arguments are equally important for an effective design, in particular when dealing with knowledge from the past in any domain. It is assumed that the presented methodology and the upper level of the ontology are applicable in a by far wider domain.

[1]  Shiyali Ramamrita Ranganathan,et al.  The colon classification , 1965 .

[2]  B. Tversky,et al.  Objects, parts, and categories. , 1984 .

[3]  Matthias Jarke,et al.  Telos: representing knowledge about information systems , 1990, TOIS.

[4]  P. Feyerabend.  Three Dialogues on Knowledge , 1991 .

[5]  Gio Wiederhold,et al.  Mediators in the architecture of future information systems , 1992, Computer.

[6]  John J. Leggett,et al.  Semantic data modeling of hypermedia associations , 1993, TOIS.

[7]  Panos Constantopoulos,et al.  CULTURAL DOCUMENTATION: THE CLIO SYSTEM , 1994 .

[8]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  Ontologies and Knowledge Bases. Towards a Terminological Clarification , 1995 .

[9]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing? , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[10]  Martin Doerr,et al.  Modelling occurences in cultural documentation , 1996 .

[11]  Simone Pribbenow,et al.  A Conceptual Theory of Part-Whole Relations and its Applications , 1996, Data Knowl. Eng..

[12]  Barry Smith,et al.  Fiat and Bona Fide Boundaries: Towards on Ontology of Spatially Extended Objects , 1997, COSIT.

[13]  Jeff Cowton.  SPECTRUM : The UK Museum Documentation Standard , 1997 .

[14]  Diego Calvanese,et al.  Description Logic Framework for Information Integration , 1998, KR.

[15]  Terry Quatrani,et al.  Visual modeling with rational Rose and UML , 1998, Addison-Wesley object technology series.

[16]  Silvana Castano,et al.  An intelligent approach to information integration , 1998 .

[17]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  Formal Ontology and Information Systems , 1998 .

[18]  Nicolas Spyratos,et al.  On the Semantics of a Semantic Network , 1998, Fundam. Informaticae.

[19]  J. A. I. Briz Barceló,et al.  POLEMON: A Federated Database Management System for the Documentation, Management and Promotion of Cultural Heritage , 1999 .

[20]  Rudi Studer,et al.  Ontologies as Conceptual Models for XML Documents , 1999 .

[21]  Martin Doerr,et al.  Electronic Esperanto: The Role of the Object Oriented CIDOC Reference Model , 1999, ICHIM.

[22]  Fernandez Lopez,et al.  Overview Of Methodologies For Building Ontologies , 1999, IJCAI 1999.

[23]  Thomas Baker,et al.  A Grammar of Dublin Core , 2000, D Lib Mag..

[24]  Martin Doerr.  Mapping of the Dublin Core Metadata Element Set to the CIDOC CRM , 2000 .

[25]  Vassilis Christophides,et al.  Querying RDF Descriptions for Community Web Portals , 2001, BDA.

[26]  Jane Hunter,et al.  The ABC Ontology and Model , 2001, J. Digit. Inf..

[27]  Martin Doerr,et al.  Definition of the CIDOC object-oriented Conceptual Reference Model and Crossreference Manual , 2002 .

[28]  Elizabeth Woods.  Encoded Archival Description (EAD) Document Type Definition (DTD) , 2002 .

[29]  Martin Doerr Nicholas Crofts Ifigenia Dionissiadu Christi Gritzapi.  Notes on the transformation of the CIDOC relational data model 1 , 2022 .