Process Investigations for the Global Studio Project Version 3.0

In this paper we present an overview of current plans for the global studio project version 3.0. version 3.0 applies a new experimental process with a higher degree of collaboration and that relies less on the central team, as compared to the extended workbench model. We expect that the use of an architecture for component integration and the identification of domain experts for each component will significantly reduce the amount of upfront architecture and requirements work usually required from the central team in the extended workbench model.

[1]  Connie U. Smith,et al.  Performance model interchange format (PMIF 2.0): XML definition and implementation , 2004, First International Conference on the Quantitative Evaluation of Systems, 2004. QEST 2004. Proceedings..

[2]  Raghvinder S. Sangwan,et al.  Global Software Development Handbook (Auerbach Series on Applied Software Engineering Series) , 2006 .

[3]  Connie U. Smith,et al.  A performance model interchange format , 1999, J. Syst. Softw..

[4]  Robert L. Nord,et al.  Applied Software Architecture , 1999, Addison Wesley object technology series.

[5]  J.D. Herbsleb,et al.  Global software development at Siemens: experience from nine projects , 2005, Proceedings. 27th International Conference on Software Engineering, 2005. ICSE 2005..

[6]  Marcelo Cataldo,et al.  Siemens Global Studio Project: Experiences Adopting an Integrated GSD Infrastructure , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering (ICGSE'06).

[7]  Ken Schwaber,et al.  Agile Project Management with Scrum , 1980 .

[8]  Raghvinder S. Sangwan,et al.  Global software development handbook , 2006 .

[9]  Len Bass,et al.  Architecture-Centric Software Project Management: A Practical Guide , 2002 .