Comparative life cycle assessment of low-pressure RTM, compression RTM and high-pressure RTM manufacturing processes to produce CFRP car hoods

Abstract Advanced composite materials, especially those based on carbon fibers, have been attracting the interest of industrial companies for producing light and high-performance components. Resin Transfer Molding (RTM) and its variants have been recognized as the most promising processes to manufacture CFRP (Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer) products in a cost-effective way. However, recent research studies highlighted environmental concerns regarding the use of CFRP parts due to the high environmental load related to their production. In this context, the main scope of the present paper is to investigate and compare the environmental impacts of three alternative manufacturing processes for producing CFRP car hoods: RTM, High-Pressure RTM and Compression-RTM. This analysis has been carried out through the standard Life Cycle Assessment methodology. The system boundaries include all the flows related to manufacturing of the hood and an end of life. Results calculated by using the ReCiPe mid-point/end-point method suggest that the eco-friendliest variant is the Compression-RTM.

[1]  Véronique Michaud,et al.  Economic and environmental assessment of alternative production methods for composite aircraft components , 2012 .

[2]  Michele Germani,et al.  PLANTLCA: A Lifecycle Approach to Map and Characterize Resource Consumptions and Environmental Impacts of Manufacturing Plants , 2016 .

[3]  Susanna Laurenzi,et al.  Advanced Composite Materials by Resin Transfer Molding for Aerospace Applications , 2012 .

[4]  D. Morrey,et al.  A coherent life cycle assessment of a range of lightweighting strategies for compact vehicles , 2015 .

[5]  Jan-Anders E. Månson,et al.  Assessing the life cycle costs and environmental performance of lightweight materials in automobile applications , 2011 .

[6]  Michele Germani,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Home Smart Objects: Kitchen Hood Cases , 2018 .

[7]  Mark Holmes,et al.  Carbon composites continue to find new markets , 2017 .

[8]  Mark Holmes,et al.  Carbon fibre reinforced plastics market continues growth path , 2013 .

[9]  Suresh G. Advani,et al.  Process analysis of compression resin transfer molding , 2009 .

[10]  Michele Germani,et al.  A Life Cycle Model to Assess Costs and Environmental Impacts of Different Maritime Vessel Typologies , 2017 .

[11]  Frank R. Field,et al.  End-of-life LCA allocation methods: Open loop recycling impacts on robustness of material selection decisions , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology.

[12]  Thomas Lützkendorf,et al.  Cumulative energy demand in LCA: the energy harvested approach , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[13]  Volker Mathes,et al.  The composites industry: plenty of opportunities in heterogeneous market , 2017 .

[14]  T. Gutowski,et al.  Life cycle energy analysis of fiber-reinforced composites , 2009 .

[15]  Ignace Verpoest,et al.  Environmental impact analysis of composite use in car manufacturing , 2009 .