Agent-Based Modeling: A New Approach for Theory Building in Social Psychology

Most social and psychological phenomena occur not as the result of isolated decisions by individuals but rather as the result of repeated interactions between multiple individuals over time. Yet the theory-building and modeling techniques most commonly used in social psychology are less than ideal for understanding such dynamic and interactive processes. This article describes an alternative approach to theory building, agent-based modeling (ABM), which involves simulation of large numbers of autonomous agents that interact with each other and with a simulated environment and the observation of emergent patterns from their interactions. The authors believe that the ABM approach is better able than prevailing approaches in the field, variable-based modeling (VBM) techniques such as causal modeling, to capture types of complex, dynamic, interactive processes so important in the social world. The article elaborates several important contrasts between ABM and VBM and offers specific recommendations for learning more and applying the ABM approach.

[1]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[2]  A. Bernstein,et al.  A COMPUTER SIMULATION MODEL OF COMMUNITY REFERENDUM CONTROVERSIES , 1963 .

[3]  Master Gardener,et al.  Mathematical games: the fantastic combinations of john conway's new solitaire game "life , 1970 .

[4]  Thomas C. Schelling,et al.  Dynamic models of segregation , 1971 .

[5]  G. William Walster,et al.  Physical attractiveness and dating choice: A test of the matching hypothesis☆ , 1971 .

[6]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[7]  J. Curran,et al.  The effects of physical attraction and attitude similarity on attraction in dating dyads , 1975 .

[8]  J M Smith,et al.  Evolution and the theory of games , 1976 .

[9]  J. Critelli,et al.  Physical attractiveness, romantic love, and equity restoration in dating relationships. , 1980, Journal of personality assessment.

[10]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The evolution of cooperation. , 1984, Science.

[11]  B. Latané The psychology of social impact. , 1981 .

[12]  E. Mcmullin Two Ideals of Explanation in Natural Science1 , 1984 .

[13]  G. Stasser,et al.  Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion , 1985 .

[14]  S. Kalick,et al.  The Matching Hypothesis Reexamined , 1986 .

[15]  Les Gasser,et al.  MACE: A Flexible Testbed for Distributed AI Research , 1987 .

[16]  James A. Anderson,et al.  Neurocomputing: Foundations of Research , 1988 .

[17]  Garold Stasser,et al.  Computer simulation as a research tool: The DISCUSS model of group decision making , 1988 .

[18]  O. G. Selfridge,et al.  Pandemonium: a paradigm for learning , 1988 .

[19]  Norbert L. Kerr,et al.  Influence processes and consensus models in decision-making groups. , 1989 .

[20]  B. Latané,et al.  From private attitude to public opinion: A dynamic theory of social impact. , 1990 .

[21]  R. Beer,et al.  Intelligence as Adaptive Behavior: An Experiment in Computational Neuroethology , 1990 .

[22]  L. Cosmides,et al.  The psychological foundations of culture. , 1992 .

[23]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[24]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  Turtles, termites, and traffic jams - explorations in massively parallel microworlds , 1994 .

[25]  G. Mann The Quark and the Jaguar: adventures in the simple and the complex , 1994 .

[26]  David M. Messick,et al.  Individual Heuristics and the Dynamics of Cooperation in Large Groups. , 1995 .

[27]  S. Kauffman At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity , 1995 .

[28]  Robert L. Axtell,et al.  Aligning simulation models: A case study and results , 1996, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[29]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  What do connectionism and social psychology offer each other? , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  Nelson Minar,et al.  The Swarm Simulation System: A Toolkit for Building Multi-Agent Simulations , 1996 .

[31]  P. Thagard,et al.  FORMING IMPRESSIONS FROM STEREOTYPES, TRAITS, AND BEHAVIORS : A PARALLEL-CONSTRAINT-SATISFACTION THEORY , 1996 .

[32]  F. Capra The Web of Life: A New Scientific Understanding of Living Systems , 1996 .

[33]  Michael W. Macy,et al.  Natural Selection and Social Learning in Prisoner's Dilemma: Coadaptation with Genetic Algorithms and Artificial Neural Networks , 1996 .

[34]  Peter M. Todd,et al.  Searching for the Next Best Mate , 1997 .

[35]  R. Axelrod The Dissemination of Culture , 1997 .

[36]  W. Mischel,et al.  Personality as a stable cognitive-affective activation network: Characteristic patterns of behavior variation emerge from a stable personality structure. , 1998 .

[37]  Janet B. Ruscher,et al.  Prejudice and Stereotyping in Everyday Communication , 1998 .

[38]  Brian Hazlehurst,et al.  The Emergence of Propositions from the Co-ordination of Talk and Action in a Shared World , 1998 .

[39]  Eliot R. Smith Mental representation and memory. , 1998 .

[40]  Vaughn R. McKim,et al.  Causality in crisis? : statistical methods and the search for causal knowledge in the social sciences , 1998 .

[41]  R. Nisbett,et al.  The cultural matrix of social psychology , 1998 .

[42]  William Bechtel,et al.  Representations and Cognitive Explanations: Assessing the Dynamicist's Challenge in Cognitive Science , 1998, Cogn. Sci..

[43]  Frank Van Overwalle,et al.  Causal explanation as constraint satisfaction : A critique and a feedforward connectionist alternative , 1998 .

[44]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  Choice Shift and Group Polarization , 1999, American Sociological Review.

[45]  P. Todd,et al.  Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart , 1999 .

[46]  M. Resnick,et al.  Thinking in Levels: A Dynamic Systems Approach to Making Sense of the World , 1999 .

[47]  Joshua M. Epstein,et al.  Agent-based computational models and generative social science , 1999, Complex..

[48]  Harrison Si,et al.  Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology: Author Index , 2013 .

[49]  Herbert Gintis,et al.  Game Theory Evolving: A Problem-Centered Introduction to Modeling Strategic Interaction - Second Edition , 2009 .

[50]  Pietro Terna,et al.  How to build and use agent-based models in social science , 2000 .

[51]  H. Reis,et al.  The relationship context of human behavior and development. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[52]  Garold Stasser,et al.  Computer simulation methods for social psychology. , 2000 .

[53]  EdK-Group,et al.  Exit, Anonymity and the Chances of Egoistical Cooperation , 2000 .

[54]  N. Takahashi The Emergence of Generalized Exchange , 2000, American Journal of Sociology.

[55]  Wander Jager,et al.  Fashions, habits and changing preferences: Simulation of psychological factors affecting market dynamics , 2001 .

[56]  C. Judd,et al.  The communication of social stereotypes: the effects of group discussion and information distribution on stereotypic appraisals. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[57]  R. Sun Cognitive science meets multi-agent systems: A prolegomenon , 2001 .

[58]  Harold Houba Game Theory Evolving: a Problem-centered Introduction to Modeling Stratgeic Behavior [Review of: H. Gintis (2000) Game Theory Evolving: a Problem-centered Introduction to Modeling Strategic Behavior] , 2001 .

[59]  P. Doreian Causality in Social Network Analysis , 2001 .

[60]  Rainer Hegselmann,et al.  Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, analysis and simulation , 2002, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[61]  Dietrich Stauffer Monte Carlo simulations of Sznajd models , 2002, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[62]  Stephen Wolfram,et al.  A New Kind of Science , 2003, Artificial Life.

[63]  M. Macy,et al.  FROM FACTORS TO ACTORS: Computational Sociology and Agent-Based Modeling , 2002 .

[64]  Joshua M. Epstein,et al.  Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up , 1996 .

[65]  Robin R. Vallacher,et al.  The Dynamical Perspective in Personality and Social Psychology , 2002 .

[66]  M. Macy,et al.  Stochastic Collusion and the Power Law of Learning , 2002 .

[67]  Jonathan E. Butner,et al.  Dynamical evolutionary psychology: individual decision rules and emergent social norms. , 2003, Psychological review.

[68]  David L. Sallach,et al.  Social theory and agent architectures: prospective issues in rapid-discovery social science , 2003 .

[69]  Barbara Messing,et al.  An Introduction to MultiAgent Systems , 2002, Künstliche Intell..

[70]  Yoshihisa Kashima,et al.  How are stereotypes maintained through communication? The influence of stereotype sharedness. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[71]  R. Hastie,et al.  The Logic of Social Sharing: An Evolutionary Game Analysis of Adaptive Norm Development , 2003, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[72]  H. Markus,et al.  Toward a Conception of Culture Suitable for a Social Psychology of Culture. , 2004 .

[73]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Socially Situated Cognition: Cognition in its Social Context , 2004 .

[74]  Nicholas Mark Gotts,et al.  Agent-Based Simulation in the Study of Social Dilemmas , 2003, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[75]  Sean Luke,et al.  MASON: A New Multi-Agent Simulation Toolkit , 2004 .

[76]  Charles M. Macal,et al.  Escaping the Accidents of History: An Overview of Artificial Life Modeling with Repast , 2005 .

[77]  Charles M. Macal,et al.  Tutorial on agent-based modeling and simulation , 2005 .

[78]  Social life from the bottom up: Agent modeling and the New Sociology , 2005 .

[79]  José Manuel Galán,et al.  Appearances Can Be Deceiving: Lessons Learned Re-Implementing Axelrod's 'Evolutionary Approach to Norms' , 2005, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[80]  B. Edmonds,et al.  Sociology and Simulation: Statistical and Qualitative Cross‐Validation1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[81]  Lars-Erik Cederman,et al.  Computational Models of Social Forms: Advancing Generative Process Theory1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[82]  U. Wilensky Running head: AGENT-BASED MODELING FOR PSYCHOLOGY Piaget? Vygotsky? I’m Game!: Agent-Based Modeling for Psychology Research , 2005 .

[83]  L. Steels,et al.  coordinating perceptually grounded categories through language: a case study for colour , 2005, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[84]  I. G. Explanation,et al.  REMARKS ON THE FOUNDATIONS OF AGENT-BASED GENERATIVE SOCIAL SCIENCE † , 2005 .

[85]  Francis Heylighen,et al.  Talking nets: a multiagent connectionist approach to communication and trust between individuals. , 2006, Psychological review.

[86]  Joshua M. Epstein,et al.  Remarks on the Foundations of Agent-Based Generative Social Science , 2012 .

[87]  U. Wilensky,et al.  Thinking Like a Wolf, a Sheep, or a Firefly: Learning Biology Through Constructing and Testing Computational Theories—An Embodied Modeling Approach , 2006 .

[88]  Mauro Birattari,et al.  Swarm Intelligence , 2012, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[89]  P. Robbins,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition , 2001 .

[90]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Propagation of innovations in networked groups. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[91]  W. Clancey The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition: Scientific Antecedents of Situated Cognition , 2008 .

[92]  W. Clancey Scientific Antecedents of Situated Cognition , 2008 .