Comparative study by PEPT and DEM for flow and mixing in a ploughshare mixer

Abstract Investigation of the granular flow induced by a single plough mixer was performed using positron emission particle tracking (PEPT) and Discrete Element Modelling (DEM). Both approaches showed the development of two loops of circulation, one on either side of the plough. Particles are pushed forward through the bed by the plough and then picked up and thrown through the space above the bed, before falling to the surface and then slowly flowing back into the trench left behind the plough blade. The flow patterns obtained experimentally were compared to those obtained using DEM for a speed of 2.25 Hz and showed reasonable qualitative agreement. However, the angle of repose of the trench down which the avalanching back flow occurs was found to be too shallow in the DEM predictions. This is due to the rice grains being represented as spheres in the model — a demonstration of the modelling penalty in over-idealising particles and ignoring their shape. In contrast, the PEPT process used was unable to resolve the dilute cloud of ballistic material thrown by the plough and was also unable to identify dead regions of the bed. Uneven sampling of the phase space in PEPT can be a consequence of density and size differences between the tracer particle used and the bulk material. Mixing rates for different blade speeds were characterised for both PEPT and DEM. Good quantitative correlation was found and a consistent picture of increasing mixing efficiency with increasing plough speed was observed. Finally, observations on the averaging of PEPT and DEM data and on the comparison results from these two methods are made.

[1]  Paul W. Cleary,et al.  Large scale industrial DEM modelling , 2004 .

[2]  P. Bak,et al.  Scale Invariant Spatial and Temporal Fluctuations in Complex Systems , 1988 .

[3]  Paul W. Cleary,et al.  An investigation of the comparative behaviour of alternative contact force models during elastic collisions , 2011 .

[4]  Paul W. Cleary,et al.  Assessing mixing characteristics of particle-mixing and granulation devices , 2008 .

[5]  Jpk Seville,et al.  Solids circulation and axial dispersion of cohesionless particles in a V-mixer , 2005 .

[6]  Paul W. Cleary,et al.  Industrial particle flow modelling using discrete element method , 2009 .

[7]  David Parker,et al.  A phenomenological study of a batch mixer using a positron camera , 1993 .

[8]  M. R. Hawkesworth,et al.  Positron emission particle tracking - a technique for studying flow within engineering equipment , 1993 .

[9]  Charles S. Campbell,et al.  RAPID GRANULAR FLOWS , 1990 .

[10]  Mihail C. Roco,et al.  Particulate two-phase flow , 1993 .

[11]  François Bertrand,et al.  Comparative study of the mixing of free-flowing particles in a V-blender and a bin-blender , 2007 .

[12]  Masayuki Horio,et al.  Numerical analysis of particle mixing characteristics in a single helical ribbon agitator using DEM simulation , 2000 .

[13]  David Parker,et al.  Motion in a particle bed agitated by a single blade , 2000 .

[14]  John Bridgwater,et al.  Dispersive granular flow in a horizontal drum stirred by a single blade , 2002 .

[15]  David Parker,et al.  Axial mixing in a ploughshare mixer , 2007 .

[16]  D. J. Parker,et al.  Study of the influence of blade speed on the performance of a powder mixer using positron emission particle tracking , 1993 .

[17]  Paul W. Cleary,et al.  Charge behaviour and power consumption in ball mills: sensitivity to mill operating conditions, liner geometry and charge composition , 2001 .

[18]  Paul W. Cleary.  Discrete element modelling of industrial granular flow applications , 1998 .

[19]  Paul W. Cleary,et al.  DEM simulation of industrial particle flows: case studies of dragline excavators, mixing in tumblers and centrifugal mills , 2000 .

[20]  Aibing Yu,et al.  Simulated and measured flow of granules in a bladed mixer—a detailed comparison , 2001 .

[21]  Paul W. Cleary,et al.  How well do discrete element granular flow models capture the essentials of mixing processes , 1998 .

[22]  Evangelos Tsotsas,et al.  Mixing of particles in rotary drums: A comparison of discrete element simulations with experimental results and penetration models for thermal processes , 2006 .

[23]  F. Bertrand,et al.  DEM-based models for the mixing of granular materials , 2005 .

[24]  Aibing Yu,et al.  Microdynamic analysis of the particle flow in a cylindrical bladed mixer , 2004 .

[25]  P. Cundall,et al.  A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies , 1979 .

[26]  J. Bridgwater,et al.  A case study of particle mixing in a ploughshare mixer using Positron Emission Particle Tracking , 1998 .

[27]  Fernando J. Muzzio,et al.  A study of the mixing and segregation mechanisms in the Bohle Tote blender via DEM simulations , 2006 .

[28]  R. Behringer,et al.  Stress Fluctuations for Continuously Sheared Granular Materials. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[29]  François Bertrand,et al.  Large-scale numerical investigation of solids mixing in a V-blender using the discrete element method , 2008 .

[30]  Jam Hans Kuipers,et al.  Longitudinal and transverse mixing in rotary kilns: A discrete element method approach , 2005 .

[31]  Julio M. Ottino,et al.  Mixing of granular materials in slowly rotated containers , 1996 .

[32]  David Parker,et al.  Convection and segregation in a horizontal mixer , 2002 .

[33]  Jpk Seville,et al.  The influence of DEM simulation parameters on the particle behaviour in a V-mixer , 2002 .

[34]  Paul W. Cleary,et al.  DEM modelling of industrial granular flows: 3D case studies and the effect of particle shape on hopper discharge , 2002 .