Prefrontal Set Activity Predicts Rule-Specific Neural Processing during Subsequent Cognitive Performance

Prefrontal neurons have been shown to represent task rules. Here we show the mechanisms by which the rule-selective activity in the prefrontal cortex influences subsequent cognitive performance based on that rule. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we found that the frontopolar cortex interacted with posterior areas differently depending on whether subjects were going to perform a phonological or semantic task. Moreover, we found that the sustained “set” activity in this region predicted the activity that could be recorded in the posterior areas during the performance, as well as the speed of that performance. We argue that the prefrontal set activity does not reflect simple maintenance of the task rules but the process of implementing the rule for subsequent cognitive performance and that this is done through rule-selective interactions with areas involved in execution of the tasks.

[1]  Katsuyuki Sakai,et al.  The prefrontal cortex and working memory: physiology and brain imaging , 2004, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[2]  E. Miller,et al.  From rule to response: neuronal processes in the premotor and prefrontal cortex. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  Joseph T Devlin,et al.  The myth of the visual word form area , 2003, NeuroImage.

[4]  David Badre,et al.  Selection, Integration, and Conflict Monitoring Assessing the Nature and Generality of Prefrontal Cognitive Control Mechanisms , 2004, Neuron.

[5]  J. Gabrieli,et al.  The frontopolar cortex and human cognition: Evidence for a rostrocaudal hierarchical organization within the human prefrontal cortex , 2000, Psychobiology.

[6]  E. Miller,et al.  Task-specific neural activity in the primate prefrontal cortex. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  S. Wise,et al.  Rule-dependent neuronal activity in the prefrontal cortex , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  K. C. Anderson,et al.  Single neurons in prefrontal cortex encode abstract rules , 2001, Nature.

[9]  M. Brass,et al.  The role of the inferior frontal junction area in cognitive control , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  Jeremy R. Reynolds,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Transient and Sustained Cognitive Control during Task Switching , 2003, Neuron.

[11]  J. Desmond,et al.  Functional Specialization for Semantic and Phonological Processing in the Left Inferior Prefrontal Cortex , 1999, NeuroImage.

[12]  M. Brass,et al.  Neural Circuitry Underlying Rule Use in Humans and Nonhuman Primates , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Anterior Cingulate Conflict Monitoring and Adjustments in Control , 2004, Science.

[14]  M. Schmitter-Edgecombe,et al.  Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks following severe closed-head injury. , 2006, Neuropsychology.

[15]  R. Henson,et al.  State-related and item-related neural correlates of successful memory encoding , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[16]  J. Tanji,et al.  Neuronal activity in the primate prefrontal cortex in the process of motor selection based on two behavioral rules. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  S. Bunge How we use rules to select actions: A review of evidence from cognitive neuroscience , 2004, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[18]  E E Smith,et al.  The neural substrate and temporal dynamics of interference effects in working memory as revealed by event-related functional MRI. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  R. Passingham,et al.  Prefrontal interactions reflect future task operations , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  Lawrence H Snyder,et al.  Single Neurons in Posterior Parietal Cortex of Monkeys Encode Cognitive Set , 2004, Neuron.

[21]  A. Allport,et al.  Task switching and the measurement of “switch costs” , 2000, Psychological research.

[22]  Koji Jimura,et al.  Neural mechanism in anterior prefrontal cortex for inhibition of prolonged set interference. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  P. Matthews,et al.  Semantic Processing in the Left Inferior Prefrontal Cortex: A Combined Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  N. Meiran,et al.  Component Processes in Task Switching , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[25]  R. Passingham,et al.  Active maintenance in prefrontal area 46 creates distractor-resistant memory , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  J. Tanji,et al.  Behavioral planning in the prefrontal cortex , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[27]  E. Koechlin,et al.  The role of the anterior prefrontal cortex in human cognition , 1999, Nature.

[28]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Language-specific tuning of visual cortex? Functional properties of the Visual Word Form Area. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[29]  E. Miller,et al.  Neural circuits subserving the retrieval and maintenance of abstract rules. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  E. Miller,et al.  An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[31]  E. Darcy Burgund,et al.  Task demands modulate sustained and transient neural activity during visual-matching tasks , 2005, NeuroImage.

[32]  Katsuyuki Sakai,et al.  Prefrontal selection and medial temporal lobe reactivation in retrieval of short-term verbal information. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[33]  D. Schacter,et al.  Task-specific repetition priming in left inferior prefrontal cortex. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[34]  S. Scott,et al.  The role of the rostral frontal cortex (area 10) in prospective memory: a lateral versus medial dissociation , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[35]  S. Monsell Task switching , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[36]  A. Owen,et al.  Anterior prefrontal cortex: insights into function from anatomy and neuroimaging , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[37]  T. Shallice,et al.  The cognitive and neuroanatomical correlates of multitasking , 2000, Neuropsychologia.