Psychological factors affecting flood coping strategies

There is an acknowledged need to improve the resilience of those at risk of flooding in areas of the UK. Studies of disaster preparedness worldwide indicate raising awareness of a hazard does not necessarily engender action. In the UK the majority of the at-risk population do not display adaptation behaviours until they have experienced one or more flood events, a finding not adequately explained by levels of information provision or financial pressures. An appreciation of the psychological underpinning of current behaviour patterns, including decision-making processes, can illuminate our understanding of the strategies employed. A review of relevant psychological theories affecting adaptation behaviours in a variety of hazard situations is presented. Findings reveal the influence of belief systems, such as locus of control and self-efficacy, on decision-making in risk environments: statistically significant correlations have been noted between the types of hazard-behaviours displayed and the scores obtained on the relevant belief system metrics. It is suggested psychometric measures might be employed as capability indicators and adoption of such techniques may contribute to improved resilience in the future.

[1]  Lindsey R. Barnes,et al.  A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters , 2008 .

[2]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[3]  L B Lave,et al.  Public perception of the risks of floods: implications for communication. , 1991, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[4]  J. Rotter Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. , 1966, Psychological monographs.

[5]  T. Webler,et al.  Risk, Uncertainty and Rational Action , 2001 .

[6]  Leigh M. Smith,et al.  Volcanic Hazards: Risk Perception and Preparedness , 2000 .

[7]  A. Patt,et al.  Adaptive capacity and human cognition: The process of individual adaptation to climate change , 2005 .

[8]  David A. McEntire,et al.  Addressing vulnerability through an integrated approach , 2010 .

[9]  Tim Harries Householder responses to flood risk : the consequences of the search for ontological security , 2008 .

[10]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability , 1973 .

[11]  T. McGee,et al.  “It's just a natural way of life…” an investigation of wildfire preparedness in rural Australia , 2003 .

[12]  Ethan T Knocke,et al.  Flash Flood Awareness in Southwest Virginia , 2007, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[13]  Alexander D. Stajkovic,et al.  Social cognitive theory and self-efficacy: Goin beyond traditional motivational and behavioral approaches , 1998 .

[14]  T. Grothmann,et al.  People at Risk of Flooding: Why Some Residents Take Precautionary Action While Others Do Not , 2006 .

[15]  Holly Bender,et al.  What Motivates Individuals to Protect Themselves from Risks: The Case of Wildland Fires , 2007, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[16]  M. Fishbein,et al.  The Role of Theory in Developing Effective Health Communications , 2006 .

[17]  David. Proverbs,et al.  Flood insurance in the UK: A survey of the experience of floodplain residents , 2008 .

[18]  Johannes Persson,et al.  Climate change: Motivation for taking measure to adapt , 2009 .

[19]  B Fischhoff,et al.  Risk perception and communication unplugged: twenty years of process. , 1995, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[20]  S. Bamberg,et al.  Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour , 2007 .

[21]  T. DeLeire,et al.  An Economic Model of Locus of Control and the Human Capital Investment Decision , 2000, The Journal of Human Resources.

[22]  Melissa L. Finucane,et al.  Rational actors or rational fools: implications of the affect heuristic for behavioral economics , 2002 .

[23]  Stephen M. Johnson,et al.  The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits , 2000 .

[24]  Tim Harries,et al.  Feeling secure or being secure? Why it can seem better not to protect yourself against a natural hazard , 2008 .

[25]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Perceived risk: psychological factors and social implications , 1981, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[26]  Amjad Bhatti Risk Perception, Culture and Communication , 2009 .

[27]  Douglas Paton,et al.  Managing tsunami risk in coastal communities: Identifying predictors of preparedness , 2008 .

[28]  Norio Okada,et al.  Making sense of natural hazard mitigation: Personal, social and cultural influences , 2010 .

[29]  T. Plapp U. Werner,et al.  Understanding risk perception from natural hazards: Examples from Germany , 2006 .

[30]  R. Zajonc Feeling and thinking : Preferences need no inferences , 1980 .

[31]  James B. Hittner,et al.  Disaster Preparedness: Relationships Among Prior Experience, Personal Characteristics, and Distress , 2000 .

[32]  John McClure,et al.  When Earthquake Damage is Seen as Preventable: Attributions, Locus of Control and Attitudes to Risk , 1999 .

[33]  S. Tunstall,et al.  "I wish I'd never heard of Banbury": the relationship between 'place' and the health impacts from flooding. , 2008, Health & place.

[34]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  Natural Hazards and Motivation for Mitigation Behavior: People Cannot Predict the Affect Evoked by a Severe Flood , 2008, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[35]  G Gigerenzer,et al.  Reasoning the fast and frugal way: models of bounded rationality. , 1996, Psychological review.