Sensitivity analysis for ruin probabilities: canonical risk model

The surplus process of an insurance portfolio is defined as the wealth obtained by the premium payments minus the reimbursements made at the time of claims. When this process becomes negative (if ever), we say that ruin has occurred. The general setting is the Gambler's Ruin Problem. In this paper we address the problem of estimating derivatives (sensitivities) of ruin probabilities with respect to the rate of accidents. Estimating probabilities of rare events is a challenging problem, since naïve estimation is not applicable. Solution approaches are very recent, mostly through the use of importance sampling techniques. Sensitivity estimation is an even harder problem for these situations. We shall study three methods for estimating ruin probabilities: one via importance sampling (IS), and two others via indirect simulation: the storage process (SP), which restates the problems in terms of a queuing system, and the convolution formula (CF). To estimate the sensitivities, we apply the Rare Perturbation Analysis (RPA) method to IS, the Infinitesimal Perturbation Analysis (IPA) method to SP and the score function method to CF. Simulation methods are compared in terms of their efficiency, a criterion that appropriately weighs precision and CPU time. As well, we indicate how other criteria such as set-up time and prior formulae development may actually be problem-dependent.

[1]  F. Vázquez-Abad RPA pathwise derivative estimation of ruin probabilities , 2000 .

[2]  Pierre Brémaud,et al.  On the pathwise computation of derivatives with respect to the rate of a point process: The phantom RPA method , 1992, Queueing Syst. Theory Appl..

[3]  P. Glynn LIKELIHOOD RATIO GRADIENT ESTIMATION : AN OVERVIEW by , 2022 .

[4]  Hans U. Gerber,et al.  Three Methods to Calculate the Probability of Ruin , 1989, ASTIN Bulletin.

[5]  S. Wittevrongel,et al.  Queueing Systems , 2019, Introduction to Stochastic Processes and Simulation.

[6]  Erhan Çinlar,et al.  Introduction to stochastic processes , 1974 .

[7]  M. Fu,et al.  Addendum to "Extensions and generalizations of smoothed perturbation analysis in a generalized semi-Markov process framework" , 1992 .

[8]  S. Asmussen,et al.  Ruin probabilities via local adjustment coefficients , 1995 .

[9]  Alan Weiss,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis for Simulations via Likelihood Ratios , 1989, Oper. Res..

[10]  Paul Bratley,et al.  A guide to simulation (2nd ed.) , 1986 .

[11]  Paul Glasserman,et al.  Gradient Estimation Via Perturbation Analysis , 1990 .

[12]  Georg Ch. Pflug On-Line Optimization of Simulated Markovian Processes , 1990, Math. Oper. Res..

[13]  Felisa J. Vázquez-Abad RPA pathwise derivative estimation of ruin probabilities q , 2000 .

[14]  Peter W. Glynn,et al.  Likelilood ratio gradient estimation: an overview , 1987, WSC '87.

[15]  S. Asmussen Conjugate processes and the silumation of ruin problems , 1985 .

[16]  Linus Schrage,et al.  A guide to simulation , 1983 .

[17]  Kai Lai Chung,et al.  A Course in Probability Theory , 1949 .

[18]  S. Haberman,et al.  An Introduction to Mathematical Risk Theory . By Hans U. Gerber [S. S. Huebner Foundation, R. D. Irwin Inc. Homeward Illinois, 1979] , 1981 .

[19]  Paul Bratley,et al.  A guide to simulation , 1983 .