Estimating the Probability of Events that Have Never Occured: When is Your Vote Decisive?

Abstract Researchers sometimes argue that statisticians have little to contribute when few realizations of the process being estimated are observed. We show that this argument is incorrect even in the extreme situation of estimating the probabilities of events so rare that they have never occurred. We show how statistical forecasting models allow us to use empirical data to improve inferences about the probabilities of these events. Our application is estimating the probability that your vote will be decisive in a U.S. presidential election, a problem that has been studied by political scientists for more than two decades. The exact value of this probability is of only minor interest, but the number has important implications for understanding the optimal allocation of campaign resources, whether states and voter groups receive their fair share of attention from prospective presidents, and how formal “rational choice” models of voter behavior might be able to explain why people vote at all. We show how th...

[1]  David W. Gjertson,et al.  Summarizing DNA evidence when relatives are possible suspects , 1997 .

[2]  D. Rubin,et al.  A method for calibrating false-match rates in record linkage , 1995 .

[3]  Gary King,et al.  Why Are American Presidential Election Campaign Polls So Variable When Votes Are So Predictable? , 1993, British Journal of Political Science.

[4]  Assessing the evidential value of DNA profiles matching without using the assumption of independent loci. , 1993, Journal - Forensic Science Society.

[5]  John H. Aldrich.  Rational Choice and Turnout , 1993 .

[6]  Vicki M. Bier.  Statistical methods for the use of accident precursor data in estimating the frequency of rare events , 1993 .

[7]  T. Feddersen,et al.  A Voting Model Implying Duverger's Law and Positive Turnout , 1992 .

[8]  S. Sanchez,et al.  Observational Studies of Rare Events: A Subset Selection Approach , 1992 .

[9]  James E. Campbell.  Forecasting the Presidential Vote in the States , 1992 .

[10]  H. F. Martz,et al.  The risk of catastrophic failure of the solid rocket boosters on the space shuttle , 1992 .

[11]  James P. Levine,et al.  Wrong Winner: The Coming Debacle in the Electoral College , 1991 .

[12]  R. Jackman.  Political Institutions and Voter Turnout in the Industrial Democracies , 1987, American Political Science Review.

[13]  José M. Bernardo,et al.  Monitoring the 1982 Spanish Socialist Victory: A Bayesian Analysis , 1984 .

[14]  S. Rosenstone.  Forecasting Presidential Elections , 1983 .

[15]  Gary Chamberlain,et al.  A note on the probability of casting a decisive vote , 1981 .

[16]  IIIl Samuel Merrill.  Citizen Voting Power Under the Electoral College: A Stochastic Model Based on State Voting Patterns , 1978 .

[17]  H. Margolis.  Probability of a tie election , 1977 .

[18]  Nathaniel N. Beck.  A note on the probability of a tied election , 1975 .

[19]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[20]  John Ferejohn,et al.  The Paradox of Not Voting: A Decision Theoretic Analysis , 1974, American Political Science Review.

[21]  Steven J. Brams,et al.  The 3/2's Rule in Presidential Campaigning , 1974, American Political Science Review.

[22]  S. Brams,et al.  RESOURCE‐ALLOCATION MODELS IN PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGNING: IMPLICATIONS FOR DEMOCRATIC REPRESENTATION * , 1973, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Eugene Silberberg,et al.  Is the act of voting rational? , 1973 .

[24]  W. Riker,et al.  A Theory of the Calculus of Voting , 1968, American Political Science Review.

[25]  Banzhaf,et al.  One Man, 3.312 Votes: A Mathematical Analysis of the Electoral College , 1968 .

[26]  L. J. Savage,et al.  The Foundations of Statistics , 1955 .