Characterizing Student Attention in Technology-Infused Classrooms Using Real-time Active Window Data

As computers become more prevalent (and required) in engineering classrooms, it becomes increasingly important to address the dichotomy in our current understanding of their impact on student attention and learning. While some researchers report increased student learning, others report computers as a distraction to learning. To address this conflict, the research community must gain a fundamental understanding of how students use their computers in-class and how student attention is connected to learning and pedagogical practice. By gaining such an understanding, instructors’ design of classroom interventions aimed at increasing positive computer usage will be better informed. The purpose of this quantitative research study is to answer the overarching question “How do students use computers in technology-infused classrooms?” through an investigation of student attention. Based on the premise that one’s senses must be oriented towards a stimulus to receive the stimulus, it is hypothesized that attention in a technology-infused classroom can be measured by monitoring a students’ top-most, active window (the Active Window Method). This novel approach mitigates issues with prior data collection methods, and allows researchers the opportunity to capture real-time student computer usage. This research serves the dual purpose of validating the Active Window Method and investigating applications of the method. The Active Window Method is validated by comparing real-time active window data with in-class observations of attention in engineering courses with large enrollments. The bootstrap resampling technique is used to estimate mean error rate. Posttests are used to establish convergent validity by relating learning to active window data. Polytomous logistic regression is used to examine the probability of post-test score (response) over the range of attention levels (factor). Subsequent to validation, two applications of the Active Window Method were pursued. First, student computer use is characterized in multiple large lecture sections. Second, in

[1]  Perry J. Samson,et al.  Deliberate Engagement of Laptops in Large Lecture Classes to Improve Attentiveness and Engagement , 2010 .

[2]  Larry B. Wallnau,et al.  Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 1985 .

[3]  Robert G. D. Steel,et al.  A Rank Sum Test for Comparing All Pairs of Treatments , 1960 .

[4]  Maryellen Weimer,et al.  Learner-Centered Teaching: Five Key Changes to Practice , 2013 .

[5]  S. Chatterjee,et al.  Regression Analysis by Example , 1979 .

[6]  Dean W. Wichern,et al.  Assessing the Impact of Market Disturbances Using Intervention Analysis , 1977 .

[7]  Theresa L. Utlaut,et al.  Introduction to Time Series Analysis and Forecasting , 2008 .

[8]  R. D. Hoge,et al.  The Validity of Direct Observation Measures of Pupil Classroom Behavior , 1985 .

[9]  Toni L. Doolen,et al.  The Relationship Between PDA Usage and Student Performance in an Introductory Engineering Course , 2003 .

[10]  Gwilym M. Jenkins,et al.  Time series analysis, forecasting and control , 1971 .

[11]  Phillip C. Wankat The effective, efficient professor , 2001 .

[12]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[13]  H. Kraemer,et al.  Observed Classroom Behavior of Children with ADHD: Relationship to Gender and Comorbidity , 2002, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[14]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. , 1957 .

[15]  Hall P. Beck,et al.  When the Tail Wags the Dog , 2000 .

[16]  Claudia Smarkola,et al.  Ubiquitous laptop usage in higher education: Effects on student achievement, student satisfaction, and constructivist measures in honors and traditional classrooms , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[17]  C. Edelbrock,et al.  Reliability and validity of the direct observation form of the child behavior checklist , 1983, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[18]  Aditya Johri,et al.  Creating a participatory learning environment in large lecture classes using pen-based computing , 2008, ICLS.

[19]  K. Perreault,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2011 .

[20]  P Pflaumer,et al.  Forecasting U.S. population totals with the Box-Jenkins approach. , 1992, International journal of forecasting.

[21]  Christopher B. Williams,et al.  TABLET PC INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGIES FOR STRUCTURED COMPUTER USE: AN INSTRUCTOR’S EXPERIENCE AND STUDENT PERCEPTIONS , 2013 .

[22]  M. E. Gredler,et al.  Learning and Instruction: Theory into Practice , 1986 .

[23]  Heikki Mannila,et al.  Principles of Data Mining , 2001, Undergraduate Topics in Computer Science.

[24]  W. Kruskal,et al.  Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis , 1952 .

[25]  Michael J. Kofler,et al.  Variability of Attention Processes in ADHD , 2009, Journal of attention disorders.

[26]  J. Ledolter,et al.  Evaluating the Impact of the 65 mph Maximum Speed Limit on Iowa Rural Interstates , 1996 .

[27]  Roy P. Pargas,et al.  Laptops in the classroom , 2003, SIGCSE.

[28]  Karin Archer,et al.  Examining the impact of off-task multi-tasking with technology on real-time classroom learning , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[29]  Joseph G. Tront Facilitating Pedagogical Practices through a Large-Scale Tablet PC Deployment , 2007, Computer.

[30]  Sarah A. Rajala,et al.  Retention of Undergraduate Engineering Students: Extending Research Into Practice , 2010 .

[31]  N. Mackintosh A Theory of Attention: Variations in the Associability of Stimuli with Reinforcement , 1975 .

[32]  R. B. Johnson,et al.  Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches , 2007 .

[33]  Karen A. Wilson,et al.  Attention during Lectures: Beyond Ten Minutes , 2007 .

[34]  Carrie B. Fried,et al.  In-class laptop use and its e V ects on student learning , 2006 .

[35]  J. Billy,et al.  Assessment of factors affecting the validity of self-reported health-risk behavior among adolescents: evidence from the scientific literature. , 2003, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[36]  Kyu Yon Lim,et al.  Acceptance of Tablet PC technology by engineering faculty , 2008, 2008 38th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference.

[37]  M Kalantzis,et al.  The conditions of learning , 2005 .

[38]  David C. Novak,et al.  Examining the Affects of Student Multitasking with Laptops During the Lecture , 2010, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..

[39]  James H. McMillan,et al.  Educational Research: Fundamentals for the Consumer. Second Edition. , 1996 .

[40]  M. Paradiso,et al.  Neuroscience: Exploring the Brain , 1996 .

[41]  N. Cowan Attention and Memory: An Integrated Framework , 1995 .

[42]  P. Young,et al.  Time series analysis, forecasting and control , 1972, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[43]  Michael C. Musheno,et al.  Changing the Public Drunkenness Laws: The Impact of Decriminalization , 1978 .

[44]  R. Kolar,et al.  Behind the Laptops in a Large Lecture , 2011 .

[45]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom‐Based Practices , 2005 .

[46]  M. Barak,et al.  Wireless Laptops as Means For Promoting Active Learning In Large Lecture Halls , 2006 .

[47]  Shaobo Huang,et al.  Predicting student academic performance in an engineering dynamics course: A comparison of four types of predictive mathematical models , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[48]  Catherine T. Amelink,et al.  Macroergonomic Analysis of Instructional Technology Adoption: A Case Study on Tablet PC Adoption , 2011 .

[49]  F. Wilcoxon Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods , 1945 .

[50]  C. Chabris,et al.  Gorillas in Our Midst: Sustained Inattentional Blindness for Dynamic Events , 1999, Perception.

[51]  Brian P. Bailey,et al.  On the need for attention-aware systems: Measuring effects of interruption on task performance, error rate, and affective state , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[52]  Kevin Yamamoto,et al.  Banning Laptops in the Classroom: Is it Worth the Hassles? , 2007 .

[53]  A. Collins,et al.  Cognition and learning. , 1996 .

[54]  Diane F. Halpern,et al.  Changing College Classrooms: New Teaching and Learning Strategies for an Increasingly Complex World , 1996 .

[55]  Tom Willemain Practical Time Series Forecasting: A Hands-On Guide, 2nd edition By Galit Shmueli , 2013 .

[56]  Vinod K. Lohani,et al.  Tablet Pc Applications In A Large Engineering Program , 2007 .

[57]  J. Sneller The Tablet PC classroom: Erasing borders, stimulating activity, enhancing communication , 2007, 2007 37th Annual Frontiers In Education Conference - Global Engineering: Knowledge Without Borders, Opportunities Without Passports.

[58]  Michael J. Prince,et al.  Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research , 2004 .

[59]  Ann Lehman,et al.  JMP start statistics : a guide to statistics and data analysis using JMP , 2012 .

[60]  Christopher J. Mitchell,et al.  Attention and Associative Learning: From Brain to Behaviour , 2010 .

[61]  Reynol Junco,et al.  In-class multitasking and academic performance , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[62]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 1994 .

[63]  O. D. Anderson,et al.  The Interpretation of Box-Jenkins Time Series Models , 1977 .

[64]  Joseph L Fink Why we banned use of laptops and "scribe notes" in our classroom. , 2010, American journal of pharmaceutical education.

[65]  J. Min Forecasting Japanese tourism demand in Taiwan using an intervention analysis , 2008 .

[66]  R. Kajfez,et al.  Teaching Your First Large Lecture: Surviving with Attentive and Engaged Students , 2013 .

[67]  Geri Gay,et al.  The laptop and the lecture: The effects of multitasking in learning environments , 2003, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[68]  Robin H. Kay,et al.  Unstructured vs. Structured Use of Laptops in Higher Education , 2011, J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Innov. Pract..

[69]  H. Bloom,et al.  Using “Short” Interrupted Time-Series Analysis To Measure The Impacts Of Whole-School Reforms , 2003, Evaluation review.

[70]  Robin H. Kay,et al.  Assessing laptop use in higher education classrooms: The Laptop Effectiveness Scale (LES) , 2010 .

[71]  Seymour Sudman,et al.  Question Threat and Response Bias , 1978 .

[72]  Douglas A. Bernstein,et al.  Teaching Psychology: A Step By Step Guide , 2004 .

[73]  Julie Thomas,et al.  Attention aware systems: Theories, applications, and research agenda , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[74]  Christopher B. Williams,et al.  Student Attention in Unstructured-Use, Computer-Infused Classrooms , 2013 .

[75]  George E. P. Box,et al.  Intervention Analysis with Applications to Economic and Environmental Problems , 1975 .

[76]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives , 2000 .