Intercultural Communication Online: Conversation Analysis and the Investigation of Asynchronous Written Discourse

Este articulo aborda los temas metodologicos involucrados al tratar la "cultura" y la "interculturalidad" como fenomenos interactivamente observables y demostrables en el discurso escrito asincronico. En particular, explora las formas en que el analisis de conversacion (AC) y su foco en la secuencialidad y el analisis de categorizacion de membresia pueden ayudar al analisis de la cultura como una realizacion interactiva textual. Se argumenta que, aunque hay algunas claras diferencias entre el habla secuencial y el discurso escrito asincronico, hay todavia formas interesantes en las que los focos analiticos del AC pueden aplicarse al discurso en linea. Tanto la preocupacion en torno a la secuencialidad y al analisis de categorizacion de membresia pueden ayudarnos bien a mirar como la construccion de practicas de discurso intercultural visibles y reconocibles se realizan a traves de modos escritos en los foros en linea. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0901493

[1]  E. Stokoe,et al.  Making Gender Relevant: Conversation Analysis and Gender Categories in Interaction , 2001 .

[2]  M. Wowk.  Kitzinger’s Feminist Conversation Analysis: Critical Observations , 2007 .

[3]  Telling How Texts Talk: Essays on Reading and Ethnomethodology , 1982 .

[4]  E. Schegloff.  Whose Text? Whose Context? , 1997 .

[5]  Stephen Hester,et al.  Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis , 1996 .

[6]  Eric Livingston,et al.  Making Sense of Ethnomethodology , 1987 .

[7]  Edward J. Maloney.  What Web 2.0 Can Teach Us about Learning. , 2007 .

[8]  Peter Eglin,et al.  Category, predicate and task: The pragmatics of practical action , 1992 .

[9]  Robert J. Moore,et al.  Coordinating joint activity in avatar-mediated interaction , 2007, CHI.

[10]  Helena Halmari.  Intercultural Business Telephone Conversations: A Case of Finns vs. Anglo-Americans , 1993 .

[11]  Dominic Busch.  The Notion of Culture in Linguistic Research , 2009 .

[12]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  Language Choice Online: Globalization and Identity in Egypt , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[13]  K. Leiter,et al.  A Primer of Ethnomethodology , 1980 .

[14]  Alessandro Duranti,et al.  Universal and Culture‐Specific Properties of Greetings , 1997 .

[15]  David J. Silverman,et al.  Harvey Sacks: Social Science and Conversation Analysis , 1998 .

[16]  Don R. McCreary,et al.  Crosstalk and Culture in Sino-American Communication , 1995 .

[17]  P. Have.  The Notion of Member is the Heart of the Matter: On the Role of Membership Knowledge in Ethnomethodological Inquiry , 2002 .

[18]  G. Button,et al.  Generating topic: the use of topic initial elicitors , 1985 .

[19]  Gabriele Pallotti,et al.  Conversation Analysis of Opening Sequences of Telephone Calls to Bookstores in English and Italian , 2004 .

[20]  Elizabeth Browne,et al.  Conversations in Cyberspace: a study of online learning , 2003 .

[21]  Jae-Eun Park,et al.  Co-construction of Nonnative Speaker Identity in Cross-cultural Interaction , 2007 .

[22]  J. A. Lee.  Innocent victims and evil-doers , 1984 .

[23]  Stanley Fish.  Normal Circumstances, Literal Language, Direct Speech Acts, the Ordinary, the Everyday, the Obvious, What Goes without Saying, and Other Special Cases , 1978, Critical Inquiry.

[24]  Maria Sifianou.  On the telephone again! Differences in telephone behaviour: England versus Greece , 1989, Language in Society.

[25]  N. Fairclough.  Language and globalization , 2006 .

[26]  Matthias Otten,et al.  Mapping the Landscape of Qualitative Research on Intercultural Communication. A Hitchhiker's Guide to the Methodological Galaxy , 2009 .

[27]  Roland Terborg.  La "ecología de presiones" en el desplazamiento de las lenguas indígenas por el español. Presentación de un modelo , 2006 .

[28]  P. Eglin.  The Montreal Massacre: A Story of Membership Categorization Analysis , 2003 .

[29]  C. Antaki,et al.  You gotta light?: On the luxury of context for understanding talk in interaction , 2008 .

[30]  E. Schegloff,et al.  The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation , 1977 .

[31]  Kirsty Williamson,et al.  Online Communities in Saudi Arabia: Evaluating the Impact on Culture Through Online Semi-Structured Interviews , 2004 .

[32]  Junko Mori.  The Construction of Interculturality: A Study of Initial Encounters Between Japanese and American Students , 2003 .

[33]  E. Schegloff,et al.  A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation , 1974 .

[34]  Will Gibson.  Negotiating textual talk : conversation analysis, pedagogy, and the organisation of online asynchronous discourse , 2009 .

[35]  Emanuel A. Schegloff,et al.  Naivete vs Sophistication or Discipline vs Self-Indulgence: A Rejoinder to Billig , 1999 .

[36]  Karen Ruhleder,et al.  Co-Constructing Non-Mutual Realities: Delay-Generated Trouble in Distributed Interaction , 2004, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[37]  C. Kitzinger,et al.  Developing Feminist Conversation Analysis: A Response to Wowk , 2008 .

[38]  Keikichi Hirose,et al.  Foreword , 2011, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[39]  P. Renshaw,et al.  Reasoning with cultural categories in understanding student diversity , 2007 .

[40]  Will Gibson,et al.  Topicality and the structure of interactive talk in face‐to‐face seminar discussions: implications for research in distributed learning media , 2006 .

[41]  Reflecting Upon Interculturality in Ethnographic Filmmaking , 2006 .

[42]  Yuri Hosoda,et al.  Repair and Relevance of Differential Language Expertise in Second Language Conversations , 2006 .

[43]  D. R. Watson.  Categorization, Authorization and Blame - Negotiation in Conversation , 1978 .

[44]  Robert J. Moore,et al.  Doing Virtually Nothing: Awareness and Accountability in Massively Multiplayer Online Worlds , 2007, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[45]  Joel Waldfogel,et al.  Introduction , 2010, Inf. Econ. Policy.