Actual safety performance of the Malaysian offshore oil platforms: Correlations between the leading and lagging indicators.

INTRODUCTION This study establishes the correlations between performance of a set of key safety factors and the actual lagging performance of oil platforms in Malaysia, hence the relevance of the key safety factors in evaluating and predicting the safety performance of oil and gas platforms. The key factors are crucial components of a safety performance evaluation framework and each key safety factor corresponds to a list of underlying safety indicators. METHOD In this study, participating industrial practitioners rated the compliance status of each indicator using a numbering system adapted from the traffic light system, based on the actual performance of 10 oil platforms in Malaysia. Safety scores of the platforms were calculated based on the ratings and compared with the actual lagging performance of the platforms. Safety scores of two platforms were compared with the facility status reports' findings of the respective platforms. RESULTS The platforms studied generally had good performance. Total recordable incident rates of the platforms were found to show significant negative correlations with management and work engagement on safety, compliance score for number of incident and near misses, personal safety, and management of change. Lost time injury rates, however, correlated negatively with hazard identification and risk assessment. The safety scores generally agreed with findings of the facility status reports with substandard process containment found as a contributor of hydrocarbon leaks. CONCLUSIONS This study proves the criterion validity of the safety performance evaluation framework and demonstrates its usability for benchmarking and continuous improvement of safety practices on the Malaysian offshore oil and gas platforms. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS This study reveals the applicability of the framework and the potential of extending safety reporting beyond the few conventional lagging safety performance indicators used. The study also highlights the synergy between correlating safety factors to streamline safety management on offshore platforms.

[1]  Wei Chen,et al.  A correlation-matrix-based hierarchical clustering method for functional connectivity analysis , 2012, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[2]  Snorre Sklet,et al.  Hydrocarbon releases on oil and gas production platforms: Release scenarios and safety barriers , 2006 .

[3]  Ezutah Udoncy Olugu,et al.  Factors affecting safety of processes in the Malaysian oil and gas industry , 2017 .

[4]  R. M. Chandima Ratnayake,et al.  Modelling of asset integrity management process: a case study for computing operational integrity preference weights , 2012 .

[5]  Sui Pheng Low,et al.  Exploring the interactive effects of safety investments, safety culture and project hazard on safety performance: An empirical analysis , 2014 .

[6]  Harry S. Shannon,et al.  Overview of the relationship between organizational and workplace factors and injury rates , 1997 .

[7]  Pedro Arezes,et al.  Risk perception and safety behaviour: A study in an occupational environment , 2008 .

[8]  J. Rentsch Climate and culture : interaction and qualitative differences in organizational meanings , 1990 .

[9]  Daniel Podgórski,et al.  Measuring operational performance of OSH management system ??? A demonstration of AHP-based selection of leading key performance indicators , 2015 .

[10]  William G. Johnson,et al.  Mort Safety Assurance Systems , 1980 .

[11]  C. Kirchsteiger,et al.  Technical note on the contribution of sociotechnical factors to accidents notified to MARS , 1999 .

[12]  Jill C. Bradley,et al.  Workplace safety: a meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[13]  Trevor Kletz,et al.  The Origins and History of Loss Prevention , 1999 .

[14]  Stavroula Leka,et al.  Psychosocial risks and hydrocarbon leaks: an exploration of their relationship in the Norwegian oil and gas industry , 2014 .

[15]  Willie Hammer Handbook of system and product safety , 1972 .

[16]  S. Gerberich,et al.  Large Machinery-Related Agricultural Injuries Across a Five-State Region in the Midwest , 2016, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[17]  Kathryn Mearns,et al.  Safety climate, safety management practice and safety performance in offshore environments , 2003 .

[18]  Espen Olsen,et al.  Exploring relationships between organizational factors and hydrocarbon leaks on offshore platform , 2015 .

[19]  Jeremy M. Beus,et al.  Safety climate and injuries: an examination of theoretical and empirical relationships. , 2010, The Journal of applied psychology.

[20]  Teemu Reiman,et al.  Leading indicators of system safety – Monitoring and driving the organizational safety potential , 2012 .

[21]  Naray Venkataraman,et al.  Safety Performance Factor , 2008, International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics : JOSE.

[22]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Risk based asset integrity indicators , 2012 .

[23]  James T. Reason,et al.  Managing the risks of organizational accidents , 1997 .

[24]  A. Haviland,et al.  The Pennsylvania certified safety committee program: an evaluation of participation and effects on work injury rates. , 2010, American journal of industrial medicine.

[25]  F. Guldenmund The nature of safety culture: a review of theory and research , 2000 .

[26]  Linda J. Bellamy,et al.  Exploring the relationship between major hazard, fatal and non-fatal accidents through outcomes and causes , 2015 .

[27]  Stephanie L. Morrow,et al.  Exploring the relationship between safety culture and safety performance in U.S. nuclear power operations , 2014 .