A dynamic theory of spatial externalities

In this paper, we revisit the theory of spatial externalities. In particular, we depart in several respects from the important literature studying the fundamental pollution free riding problem uncovered in the associated empirical works. First, instead of assuming ad hoc pollution diffusion schemes across space, we consider a realistic spatiotemporal law of motion for air and water pollution (diffusion and advection). Second, we tackle spatiotemporal non-cooperative (and cooperative) differential games. Precisely, we consider a circle partitioned into several states where a local authority decides autonomously about its investment, production and depollution strategies over time knowing that investment/production generates pollution, and pollution is transboundary. The time horizon is infinite. Third, we allow for a rich set of geographic heterogeneities across states while the literature assumes identical states. We solve analytically the induced non-cooperative differential game under decentralization and fully characterize the resulting long-term spatial distributions. We further provide with full exploration of the free riding problem, reflected in the so-called border effects. In particular, net pollution flows diffuse at an increasing rate as we approach the borders, with strong asymmetries under advection, and structural breaks show up at the borders. We also build a formal case in which a larger number of states goes with the exacerbation of pollution externalities. Finally, we explore how geographic discrepancies affect the shape of the border effects.

[1]  Leonard J. Mirman,et al.  The great fish war: an example using a dynamic Cournot-Nash solution , 2020, Fisheries Economics.

[2]  Anastasios Xepapadeas,et al.  Robust control of parabolic stochastic partial differential equations under model uncertainty , 2019, Eur. J. Control.

[3]  Hilary A. Sigman International Spillovers and Water Quality in Rivers: Do Countries Free Ride? , 2001 .

[4]  Arthur J. Caplan,et al.  Transboundary Pollution Control in Federal Systems , 1997 .

[5]  F. Tröltzsch Optimal Control of Partial Differential Equations: Theory, Methods and Applications , 2010 .

[6]  Zhi-Ming Ma,et al.  Introduction to the theory of (non-symmetric) Dirichlet forms , 1992 .

[7]  Javier de Frutos,et al.  Equilibrium strategies in a multiregional transboundary pollution differential game with spatially distributed controls , 2021, Autom..

[8]  O. F. T. Roberts The theoretical scattering of smoke in a turbulent atmosphere , 1923 .

[9]  Fausto Gozzi,et al.  Solving optimal growth models with vintage capital: The dynamic programming approach , 2008, J. Econ. Theory.

[10]  R. M. Colombo,et al.  An age and space structured SIR model describing the Covid-19 pandemic , 2020, medRxiv.

[11]  Justus Wesseler,et al.  SPATIAL DIMENSION OF EXTERNALITIES AND THE COASE THEOREM: IMPLICATIONS FOR CO-EXISTENCE OF TRANSGENIC CROPS , 2005 .

[12]  Fausto Gozzi,et al.  Stochastic optimal control in infinite dimension : dynamic programming and HJB equations , 2017 .

[13]  Paulo Brito,et al.  The dynamics of growth and distribution in a spatially heterogeneous world , 2022, Portuguese Economic Journal.

[14]  E. Hutchinson,et al.  State enforcement of federal standards: Implications for interstate pollution , 2008 .

[15]  A. Lunardi Analytic Semigroups and Optimal Regularity in Parabolic Problems , 2003 .

[16]  Andrew B. Whitford,et al.  Pollution Incidence and Political Jurisdiction: Evidence from the TRI , 2003 .

[17]  H. Brezis Functional Analysis, Sobolev Spaces and Partial Differential Equations , 2010 .

[18]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change , 1997 .

[19]  Rabah Amir,et al.  Continuous Stochastic Games of Capital Accumulation with Convex Transitions , 1996 .

[20]  Carmen Camacho,et al.  Land use dynamics and the environment , 2014 .

[21]  A. Mobarak,et al.  Decentralization and Pollution Spillovers: Evidence from the Re-drawing of County Borders in Brazil* , 2017 .

[22]  A Simple Planning Problem for COVID-19 Lockdown , 2020 .

[23]  Raouf Boucekkine,et al.  Environmental quality versus economic performance: A dynamic game approach , 2011 .

[24]  Salvatore Federico,et al.  From firm to global-level pollution control: The case of transboundary pollution , 2021, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[25]  M. Nisio On value function of stochastic differential games in infinite dimensions and its application to sensitive control , 1999 .

[26]  Viorel Barbu,et al.  Analysis and control of nonlinear infinite dimensional systems , 1993 .

[27]  David M. Konisky,et al.  Exporting Air Pollution? Regulatory Enforcement and Environmental Free Riding in the United States , 2009 .

[28]  R. Amir STOCHASTIC GAMES IN ECONOMICS AND RELATED FIELDS: AN OVERVIEW , 2001 .

[29]  Matthew E. Kahn,et al.  Water Pollution Progress at Borders: The Role of Changes in China's Political Promotion Incentives , 2015 .

[30]  The coexistence problem revisited , 2017, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[31]  James E. Monogan,et al.  Gone with the Wind: Federalism and the Strategic Placement of Air Polluters , 2015 .

[32]  Wen Shen,et al.  Measure-Valued Solutions for a Differential Game Related to Fish Harvesting , 2009, SIAM J. Control. Optim..

[33]  J. Lions Optimal Control of Systems Governed by Partial Differential Equations , 1971 .

[34]  R. Nagel,et al.  One-parameter semigroups for linear evolution equations , 1999 .

[35]  Javier de Frutos,et al.  Spatial vs. non-spatial transboundary pollution control in a class of cooperative and non-cooperative dynamic games , 2018, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[36]  C. Hauert,et al.  Spatial dynamics of ecological public goods , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  J. Lions,et al.  Non-homogeneous boundary value problems and applications , 1972 .

[38]  G. Hardin,et al.  The Tragedy of the Commons , 1968, Green Planet Blues.

[39]  On infinite-dimensional stochastic differential games , 1998 .

[40]  A. Xepapadeas,et al.  Spatial growth with exogenous saving rates , 2016 .

[41]  Pierpaolo Soravia,et al.  On Differential Games for Infinite-Dimensional Systems with Nonlinear, Unbounded Operators , 1997 .

[42]  Jiongmin Yong,et al.  Optimal Control Theory for Infinite Dimensional Systems , 1994 .

[43]  Hang Xiong,et al.  Transboundary pollution in China: a study of polluting firms' location choices in Hebei province , 2013, Environment and Development Economics.

[44]  Giorgio Fabbri,et al.  Geographical structure and convergence: A note on geometry in spatial growth models , 2016, J. Econ. Theory.

[45]  Raouf Boucekkine,et al.  Spatial dynamics and convergence: The spatial AK model , 2013, J. Econ. Theory.

[46]  James E. Monogan,et al.  Gone with the Wind: Federalism and the Strategic Location of Air Polluters: GONE WITH THE WIND , 2017 .

[47]  Guiomar Martín-Herrán,et al.  Spatial effects and strategic behavior in a multiregional transboundary pollution dynamic game , 2016, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.

[48]  Alain Bensoussan,et al.  Representation and Control of Infinite Dimensional Systems, 2nd Edition , 2007, Systems and control.

[49]  R. Bird Fiscal federalism , 2019, Federalism in China and Russia.

[50]  S. Mitter,et al.  Representation and Control of Infinite Dimensional Systems , 1992 .

[51]  Hilary A. Sigman Transboundary Spillovers and Decentralization of Environmental Policies , 2004 .

[52]  Raouf Boucekkine,et al.  Growth and agglomeration in the heterogeneous space: a generalized AK approach , 2018, Journal of Economic Geography.

[53]  E. Dockner,et al.  International Pollution Control: Cooperative versus Noncooperative Strategies , 1993 .