Five days versus a lifetime: intense associative vocabulary training generates lexically integrated words.

PURPOSE The best predictor of successful language therapy in both the acute and chronic stages after stroke is the treatment intensity, i.e., number of hours trained per week. Associative learning should be particularly suited for intense training because it places low demands on (executive) cognitive functions. It is as of yet unresolved, however, whether associative training is a valid language learning approach. It could merely produce superficial associations of acoustic-visual information, which remain outside lexical and conceptual networks. METHODS We here examined if five days of associative training in a miniature vocabulary are sufficient for an integration of novel words into the learner's mental lexicon. Twelve healthy subjects were trained 20 min daily for five consecutive days simply by frequent couplings of object pictures with novel words. RESULTS Correct responses for couplings of novel words and object names increased from a chance level of 50 percent on day 1 to >90 percent accuracy on day 5. Prior to and immediately after the vocabulary training, a cross-modal semantic priming test was administered to determine the degree of lexical integration of the novel words into the language system already in situ. CONCLUSIONS Results show that learned novel words had acquired semantic characteristics, which were comparable to words of subjects' native language acquired over a lifetime. Thus, comprehensive integration of the novel words into existing conceptual and lexical networks occurred after just five days of training. This lays the foundation for probing associative training approaches in aphasia therapy, with the hope of increasing therapy efficiency.

[1]  R. Schvaneveldt,et al.  Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  P. Zwitserlood The locus of the effects of sentential-semantic context in spoken-word processing , 1989, Cognition.

[4]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[5]  J. H. Neely Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. , 1991 .

[6]  R. R. Robey The Efficacy of Treatment for Aphasic Persons: A Meta-analysis , 1994, Brain and Language.

[7]  G. Goldenberg,et al.  Influence of Size and Site of Cerebral Lesions on Spontaneous Recovery of Aphasia and on Success of Language Therapy , 1994, Brain and Language.

[8]  T. Olsen,et al.  Aphasia in acute stroke: Incidence, determinants, and recovery , 1995, Annals of neurology.

[9]  Lori Markson,et al.  Capacities underlying word learning , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Comprehending spoken language: A blueprint of the listener , 1999 .

[11]  R. Nicoll,et al.  Synaptic plasticity and dynamic modulation of the postsynaptic membrane , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  A. Basso,et al.  Aphasia Therapy or The importance of being earnest , 2001 .

[13]  L. Labruna,et al.  Recovery from moderate aphasia in the first year poststroke: effect of type of therapy. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  Paola Marangolo,et al.  Acquisition of New “Words” in Normal Subjects: A Suggestion for the Treatment of Anomia , 2001, Brain and Language.

[15]  B. Rockstroh,et al.  Constraint-Induced Therapy of Chronic Aphasia After Stroke , 2001, Stroke.

[16]  L. Murray Attention Deficits in Aphasia: Presence, Nature, Assessment, and Treatment , 2002, Seminars in speech and language.

[17]  Caterina Breitenstein,et al.  Development and validation of a language learning model for behavioral and functional-imaging studies , 2002, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[18]  Lyndsey Nickels,et al.  Therapy for naming disorders: Revisiting, revising, and reviewing , 2002 .

[19]  R. Teasell,et al.  Intensity of Aphasia Therapy, Impact on Recovery , 2003, Stroke.

[20]  D. Gadian,et al.  Language reorganization in children with early-onset lesions of the left hemisphere: an fMRI study. , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[21]  Pienie Zwitserlood,et al.  D-Amphetamine Boosts Language Learning Independent of its Cardiovascular and Motor Arousing Effects , 2004, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[22]  A. Jansen,et al.  Word learning can be achieved without feedback: implications for aphasia therapy. , 2004, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[23]  Stefan Knecht,et al.  Does language lateralization depend on the hippocampus? , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[24]  E. Ringelstein,et al.  Levodopa: Faster and better word learning in normal humans , 2004, Annals of neurology.

[25]  Larry R Squire,et al.  Failure to acquire new semantic knowledge in patients with large medial temporal lobe lesions , 2005, Hippocampus.

[26]  D. Swinney,et al.  Neural correlates of lexicon and grammar: Evidence from the production, reading, and judgment of inflection in aphasia , 2005, Brain and Language.

[27]  B. Rockstroh,et al.  Long-Term Stability of Improved Language Functions in Chronic Aphasia After Constraint-Induced Aphasia Therapy , 2005, Stroke.

[28]  Klaus Willmes,et al.  Decreasing and increasing cues in naming therapy for aphasia , 2005 .

[29]  Albert Costa,et al.  On the categorical nature of the semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[30]  Thomas Wolbers,et al.  Hippocampus activity differentiates good from poor learners of a novel lexicon , 2005, NeuroImage.

[31]  T. Carew,et al.  Intermediate-term processes in memory formation , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[32]  S. Knecht,et al.  Tonic Dopaminergic Stimulation Impairs Associative Learning in Healthy Subjects , 2006, Neuropsychopharmacology.