Elastic registration of prostate MR images based on estimation of deformation states

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is being used increasingly for image-guided targeted biopsy and focal therapy of prostate cancer. In this paper, a combined rigid and deformable registration technique is proposed to register pre-treatment diagnostic 3T magnetic resonance (MR) images of the prostate, with the identified target tumor(s), to intra-treatment 1.5T MR images. The pre-treatment T2-weighted MR images were acquired with patients in a supine position using an endorectal coil in a 3T scanner, while the intra-treatment T2-weighted MR images were acquired in a 1.5T scanner before insertion of the needle with patients in the semi-lithotomy position. Both the rigid and deformable registration algorithms employ an intensity-based distance metric defined based on the modality independent neighborhood descriptors (MIND) between images. The optimization routine for estimating the rigid transformation parameters is initialized using four pairs of manually selected approximate corresponding points on the boundaries of the prostate. In this paper, the problem of deformable image registration is approached from the perspective of state estimation for dynamical systems. The registration algorithm employs a rather generic dynamic linear elastic model of the tissue deformation discretized by the finite element method (FEM). We use the model in a classical state estimation framework to estimate the deformation of the prostate based on the distance metric between pre- and intra-treatment images. Our deformable registration results using 17 sets of prostate MR images showed that the proposed method yielded a target registration error (TRE) of 1.87 ± 0.94 mm,2.03 ± 0.94 mm, and 1.70 ± 0.93 mm for the whole gland (WG), central gland (CG), and peripheral zone (PZ), respectively, using 76 manually-identified fiducial points. This was an improvement over the 2.67 ± 1.31 mm, 2.95 ± 1.43 mm, and 2.34 ± 1.11 mm, respectively for the WG, CG, and PZ after rigid registration alone. Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) in the WG, CG and PZ were 88.2 ± 5.3, 85.6 ± 7.6 and 68.7 ± 6.9 percent, respectively. Furthermore, the mean absolute distances (MAD) between surfaces was 1.26 ± 0.56 mm and 1.27 ± 0.55 mm in the WG and CG, after deformable registration. These results indicate that the proposed registration technique has sufficient accuracy for localizing prostate tumors in MRI-guided targeted biopsy or focal therapy of clinically localized prostate cancer.

[1]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Registered 3-D Ultrasound and Digital Stereotactic Mammography for Breast Biopsy Guidance , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  Mohammad Hamed Mousazadeh,et al.  Fast 3D Deformable Image Registration on a GPU Computing Platform , 2011 .

[3]  Yi Gao,et al.  Filtering in the Diffeomorphism Group and the Registration of Point Sets , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[4]  Michael Brady,et al.  MIND: Modality independent neighbourhood descriptor for multi-modal deformable registration , 2012, Medical Image Anal..

[5]  A Fenster,et al.  Evaluation of intersession 3D-TRUS to 3D-TRUS image registration for repeat prostate biopsies. , 2011, Medical physics.

[6]  Shahin Sirouspour,et al.  Model-Based Deformable Registration of Preoperative 3D to Intraoperative Low-Resolution 3D and 2D Sequences of MR Images , 2011, MICCAI.

[7]  Jiaoti Huang,et al.  Radical prostatectomy: value of prostate MRI in surgical planning , 2012, Abdominal Imaging.

[8]  A. D'Amico,et al.  Evaluation of three-dimensional finite element-based deformable registration of pre- and intraoperative prostate imaging. , 2001, Medical physics.

[9]  Demetri Terzopoulos,et al.  Deformable models in medical image analysis: a survey , 1996, Medical Image Anal..

[10]  K. Brock,et al.  Accuracy of finite element model-based multi-organ deformable image registration. , 2005, Medical physics.

[11]  D. Hill,et al.  Medical image registration , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  A. D'Amico,et al.  MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy with surgical navigation software: device validation and feasibility. , 2001, Radiology.

[13]  Bao Zhang,et al.  Three-dimensional Elastic Image Registration Based on Strain Energy Minimization: Application to Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2011, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[14]  Jan Modersitzky,et al.  FAIR - Flexible Algorithms for Image Registration , 2009, Fundamentals of algorithms.

[15]  Daniel O Scharfstein,et al.  Utility of saturation biopsy to predict insignificant cancer at radical prostatectomy. , 2005, Urology.

[16]  Theodorus H van der Kwast,et al.  A critical analysis of the tumor volume threshold for clinically insignificant prostate cancer using a data set of a randomized screening trial. , 2011, The Journal of urology.

[17]  K. Bathe Finite Element Procedures , 1995 .

[18]  Xavier Pennec,et al.  A Framework for Uncertainty and Validation of 3-D Registration Methods Based on Points and Frames , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[19]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[20]  Shahin Sirouspour,et al.  Model-based 3D/2D deformable registration of MR images , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[21]  Ken Goldberg,et al.  Registration of MR prostate images with biomechanical modeling and nonlinear parameter estimation. , 2006, Medical physics.

[22]  Shahin Sirouspour,et al.  Non-rigid registration of medical images based on estimation of deformation states , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  Piotr Kozlowski,et al.  Combined prostate diffusion tensor imaging and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI at 3T--quantitative correlation with biopsy. , 2010, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[24]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Rotational-Slice-Based Prostate Segmentation Using Level Set with Shape Constraint for 3D End-Firing TRUS Guided Biopsy , 2012, MICCAI.

[25]  David L Wilson,et al.  A comparative study of warping and rigid body registration for the prostate and pelvic MR volumes. , 2003, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[26]  Amir M. Tahmasebi,et al.  A statistical model-based technique for accounting for prostate gland deformation in endorectal coil-based MR imaging , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[27]  J. Z. Zhu,et al.  The finite element method , 1977 .

[28]  Shahin Sirouspour,et al.  Elastic registration of prostate MR images based on state estimation of dynamical systems , 2014, Medical Imaging.

[29]  Chi-Tsong Chen,et al.  Linear System Theory and Design , 1995 .

[30]  Shahin Sirouspour,et al.  Dynamic tracking of a deformable tissue based on 3D-2D MR-US image registration , 2014, Medical Imaging.

[31]  Masoom A Haider,et al.  Development of multiorgan finite element-based prostate deformation model enabling registration of endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging for radiotherapy planning. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[32]  Emina Torlakovic,et al.  Easy method of assessing volume of prostate adenocarcinoma from estimated tumor area: using prostate tissue density to bridge gap between percentage involvement and tumor volume. , 2005, Croatian medical journal.

[33]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  A system for MRI-guided transperineal delivery of needles to the prostate for focal therapy. , 2013, Medical physics.

[34]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Evaluation of Inter-session 3D-TRUS to 3D-TRUS Image Registration for Repeat Prostate Biopsies , 2010, MICCAI.

[35]  Long Chen FINITE ELEMENT METHOD , 2013 .

[36]  T. H. van der Kwast,et al.  Focal laser ablation for prostate cancer followed by radical prostatectomy: validation of focal therapy and imaging accuracy. , 2010, European urology.

[37]  L. R. Dice Measures of the Amount of Ecologic Association Between Species , 1945 .

[38]  Nobuhiko Hata,et al.  MRI signal intensity based B‐Spline nonrigid registration for pre‐ and intraoperative imaging during prostate brachytherapy , 2009, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[39]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Learning to detect natural image boundaries using local brightness, color, and texture cues , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[40]  T. Stamey,et al.  Zonal Distribution of Prostatic Adenocarcinoma: Correlation with Histologic Pattern and Direction of Spread , 1988, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[41]  R. Weersink,et al.  Real-time magnetic resonance imaging-guided focal laser therapy in patients with low-risk prostate cancer. , 2010, European urology.

[42]  Gene F. Franklin,et al.  Digital control of dynamic systems , 1980 .

[43]  E. Messing,et al.  Quantitative characterization of viscoelastic properties of human prostate correlated with histology. , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[44]  Aytekin Oto,et al.  MR imaging-guided focal laser ablation for prostate cancer: phase I trial. , 2013, Radiology.

[45]  Cedric X. Yu,et al.  Deformable image registration for the use of magnetic resonance spectroscopy in prostate treatment planning. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[46]  Michael Unser,et al.  Optimization of mutual information for multiresolution image registration , 2000, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[47]  Purang Abolmaesumi,et al.  Point-Based Rigid-Body Registration Using an Unscented Kalman Filter , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[48]  Geert J. S. Litjens,et al.  Required Accuracy of MR-US Registration for Prostate Biopsies , 2011, Prostate Cancer Imaging.

[49]  Jay B. West,et al.  The distribution of target registration error in rigid-body point-based registration , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[50]  Greg Welch,et al.  Welch & Bishop , An Introduction to the Kalman Filter 2 1 The Discrete Kalman Filter In 1960 , 1994 .

[51]  David A Jaffray,et al.  Accuracy and sensitivity of finite element model-based deformable registration of the prostate. , 2008, Medical physics.

[52]  Guy Nir,et al.  Model-based registration of ex vivo and in vivo MRI of the prostate using elastography , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[53]  Thomas Hambrock,et al.  Simulated required accuracy of image registration tools for targeting high-grade cancer components with prostate biopsies , 2013, European Radiology.

[54]  F. Estrada Advances in computational image segmentation and perceptual grouping , 2005 .

[55]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Treatment planning for prostate focal laser ablation in the face of needle placement uncertainty. , 2013, Medical physics.

[56]  Orcun Goksel,et al.  Biomechanical Modeling of the Prostate for Procedure Guidance and Simulation , 2012 .

[57]  A Fenster,et al.  Image guided photothermal focal therapy for localized prostate cancer: phase I trial. , 2009, The Journal of urology.