Comparison of a new integrated current source with the modified Howland circuit for EIT applications

Multi-frequency electrical impedance tomography (MF-EIT) systems require current sources that are accurate over a wide frequency range (1 MHz) and with large load impedance variations. The most commonly employed current source design in EIT systems is the modified Howland circuit (MHC). The MHC requires tight matching of resistors to achieve high output impedance and may suffer from instability over a wide frequency range in an integrated solution. In this paper, we introduce a new integrated current source design in CMOS technology and compare its performance with the MHC. The new integrated design has advantages over the MHC in terms of power consumption and area. The output current and the output impedance of both circuits were determined through simulations and measurements over the frequency range of 10 kHz to 1 MHz. For frequencies up to 1 MHz, the measured maximum variation of the output current for the integrated current source is 0.8% whereas for the MHC the corresponding value is 1.5%. Although the integrated current source has an output impedance greater than 1 MOmega up to 1 MHz in simulations, in practice, the impedance is greater than 160 kOmega up to 1 MHz due to the presence of stray capacitance.

[1]  B. Wilson,et al.  A low-distortion bipolar feedback current amplifier technique , 1981, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[2]  D S Holder,et al.  A review of errors in multi-frequency EIT instrumentation , 2007, Physiological measurement.

[3]  P Bertemes-Filho,et al.  A comparison of modified Howland circuits as current generators with current mirror type circuits. , 2000, Physiological measurement.

[4]  Takeshi Yanagisawa,et al.  A monolithic video frequency filter using NIC-based gyrators , 1987, 1987 Symposium on VLSI Circuits.

[5]  R H Bayford,et al.  Bioimpedance tomography (electrical impedance tomography). , 2006, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[6]  Alexander S Ross,et al.  Current source design for electrical impedance tomography. , 2003, Physiological measurement.

[7]  Andreas Demosthenous,et al.  A comparison study of electrodes for neonate electrical impedance tomography , 2009, Physiological measurement.

[8]  B H Brown,et al.  The Sheffield data collection system. , 1987, Clinical physics and physiological measurement : an official journal of the Hospital Physicists' Association, Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Physik and the European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics.

[9]  A Tizzard,et al.  Development of a neonate lung reconstruction algorithm using a wavelet AMG and estimated boundary form , 2008, Physiological measurement.

[10]  R H Smallwood,et al.  Multi-frequency imaging and modelling of respiratory related electrical impedance changes. , 1994, Physiological measurement.

[11]  J.C. Newell,et al.  An electric current tomograph , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  R Bragós,et al.  A parallel broadband real-time system for electrical impedance tomography. , 1996, Physiological measurement.