Race-specific norms for coding face identity and a functional role for norms.

Models of face perception often adopt a framework in which faces are represented as points or vectors in a multidimensional space, relative to the average face that serves as a norm for encoding. Since faces are very similar in their configuration and share many visual properties, they could be encoded in one common space against one norm. However, certain face properties may result in grouping and "subclassification" of similar faces. We studied the processing of faces of different races, using high-level aftereffects, where exposure to one face systematically distorts the perception of a subsequently viewed face toward the "opposite" identity in face space. We measured identity aftereffects for adapt-test pairs that were opposite relative to race-specific (Asian and Caucasian) averages and pairs that were opposite relative to a "generic" average (both races morphed together). Aftereffects were larger for race-specific compared to mixed-race adapt-test pairs. These results suggest that race-specific norms are used to code identity because aftereffects are generally larger for adapt-test pairs drawn from trajectories passing through the norm (opposite pairs) than for those that do not. We also found that identification thresholds were lower when targets were distributed around race-specific averages than around the mixed-race average, suggesting that norm-based face encoding may play a functional role in facilitating identity discrimination.

[1]  H. Wilson,et al.  fMRI evidence for the neural representation of faces , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[2]  Robert L. Solso,et al.  Facial Prototype Formation in Children. , 1993 .

[3]  A. Kohn Visual adaptation: physiology, mechanisms, and functional benefits. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  Ione Fine,et al.  Face adaptation does not improve performance on search or discrimination tasks. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[5]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Same-race faces are perceived more holistically than other-race faces , 2006 .

[6]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  Thomas Vetter,et al.  A morphable model for the synthesis of 3D faces , 1999, SIGGRAPH.

[8]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Opposite Aftereffects for Chinese and Caucasian Faces are Selective for Social Category Information and not Just Physical Face Differences , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  M. Giese,et al.  Norm-based face encoding by single neurons in the monkey inferotemporal cortex , 2006, Nature.

[10]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Fitting the mind to the World , 2003, Psychological science.

[11]  H. Leder,et al.  The Mona Lisa Effect: Is ‘Our’ Lisa Fame or Fake? , 2006, Perception.

[12]  F. Fang,et al.  Perceptual consequences of face viewpoint adaptation: face viewpoint aftereffect, changes of differential sensitivity to face view, and their relationship. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[13]  David I. Perrett,et al.  Self priming from distinctive and caricatured faces , 1996 .

[14]  G. Rhodes,et al.  The dynamics of visual adaptation to faces. , 2005, Proceedings. Biological sciences.

[15]  Gillian Rhodes,et al.  Recognition of own-race and other-race caricatures: implications for models of face recognition , 1998, Vision Research.

[16]  William G. Hayward,et al.  Race-contingent aftereffects suggest distinct perceptual norms for different race faces , 2008 .

[17]  F. Fang,et al.  Face adaptation improves gender discrimination , 2011, Vision Research.

[18]  D. Burr,et al.  Abnormal Adaptive Face-Coding Mechanisms in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder , 2007, Current Biology.

[19]  D. Perrett,et al.  Sex-contingent face aftereffects depend on perceptual category rather than structural encoding , 2008, Cognition.

[20]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Fitting the Mind to the World: Adaptation and after-effects in high-level vision , 2005 .

[21]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  What's so special about the average face? , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Adaptive norm-based coding of facial identity , 2006, Vision Research.

[23]  G. Rhodes The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. , 2006, Annual review of psychology.

[24]  T. Valentine The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology a Unified Account of the Effects of Distinctiveness, Inversion, and Race in Face Recognition , 2022 .

[25]  Tim Valentine,et al.  Face–space models of face recognition. , 2001 .

[26]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Perceptual adaptation helps us identify faces , 2010, Vision Research.

[27]  Otto H. MacLin,et al.  Figural aftereffects in the perception of faces , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[28]  R. Rüdel,et al.  Do laser diffraction studies on striated muscle indicate stepwise sarcomere shortening? , 1979, Nature.

[29]  Gunter Loffler,et al.  Synthetic faces, face cubes, and the geometry of face space , 2002, Vision Research.

[30]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Race Categorization Modulates Holistic Face Encoding , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[31]  T. Bower,et al.  Newborns Form “Prototypes” in Less Than 1 Minute , 1993 .

[32]  E. McKone,et al.  Solving the upside-down puzzle: Why do upright and inverted face aftereffects look alike? , 2010, Journal of vision.

[33]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Face aftereffects indicate dissociable, but not distinct, coding of male and female faces. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  J. Barton,et al.  Adaptation improves discrimination of face identity , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  T. Maddess,et al.  Factors governing the adaptation of cells in area-17 of the cat visual cortex , 1988, Biological Cybernetics.

[36]  A. Little,et al.  Category contingent aftereffects for faces of different races, ages and species , 2008, Cognition.

[37]  S. Langton,et al.  Adaptation effects of highly familiar faces: Immediate and long lasting , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[38]  D. Perrett,et al.  Visual Processing of Facial Distinctiveness , 1994, Perception.

[39]  G. Rhodes Superportraits: Caricatures and Recognition , 1996 .

[40]  T. Valentine,et al.  Towards an Exemplar Model of Face Processing: The Effects of Race and Distinctiveness , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[41]  J. Brigham,et al.  Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review , 2001 .

[42]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Sex-specific norms code face identity. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[43]  A. Little,et al.  Face aftereffects suggest interdependent processing of expression and sex and of expression and race , 2010 .

[44]  V. Bruce,et al.  Remembering facial configurations , 1991, Cognition.

[45]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Caricature Effects, Distinctiveness, and Identification: Testing the Face-Space Framework , 2000, Psychological science.

[46]  M. Webster,et al.  Adaptation to natural facial categories , 2002, Nature.

[47]  Volker Blanz,et al.  Automatische Rekonstruktion der dreidimensionalen Form von Gesichtern aus einem Einzelbild , 2000 .

[48]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Orientation-Contingent Face Aftereffects and Implications for Face-Coding Mechanisms , 2004, Current Biology.

[49]  M. Webster,et al.  Visual adaptation and face perception , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[50]  P. Lennie,et al.  Pattern-selective adaptation in visual cortical neurones , 1979, Nature.

[51]  Rachel A Robbins,et al.  Aftereffects for face attributes with different natural variability: adapter position effects and neural models. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[52]  A. Little,et al.  Sex-contingent face after-effects suggest distinct neural populations code male and female faces , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[53]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Identification and ratings of caricatures: Implications for mental representations of faces , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[54]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Aftereffects Reveal That Adaptive Face-Coding Mechanisms Are Selective for Race and Sex , 2011 .