Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy Emerald Article: Perceptions of information system success in the public sector: Webmasters at the steering wheel?

Abstract Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the relationships between constructs ofinformation system (IS) success in the public sector, as perceived by webmaster intermediaries, andinvestigate how user testing affects these relationships.Design/methodology/approach – Online surveys were conducted, using questionnaires, withwebmasters in Denmark and Norway who participated in the public sector web award contestsorganized by the government (n ¼ 1,237, n ¼ 541; response rate 44 per cent).Findings – It was found that the frequency with which webmasters carry out user testing affectstheir perceptions of IS success, with those who conduct no user testing displaying the weakestassociations among success variables. Findings also suggest that webmasters who do little or no usertesting conveniently assume that citizen users are satisfied, while webmasters who are moreknowledgeable of the user experience have a greater perception of levels of success.Practical implications – The fact that the majority of webmasters do not perform any type of usertesting triggers a reflection on the need for such important intermediaries to enhance their feedbackchannels. User involvement in assessing IS success cannot be overlooked, especially considering thatuser empowerment in the design, implementation, and evaluation of information systems matches awindow of opportunity originating in the ongoing growth of web interactivity.Originality/value – The paper is one of the few that investigates constructs of IS success in thepublicsector,andarguablythefirstonethatfocusesontheimpactsofusertestingontherelationshipsbetween constructs of IS success in a public setting.KeywordsDenmark,Norway,Informationsystems,Websites,Publicsector,Feedback,Intermediaries,DeLone and McLean IS success model, Webmasters, User testingPaper type Research paper

[2]  Richard T. Vidgen,et al.  Interactive E-Government: Evaluating the Web Site of the UK Inland Revenue , 2004, J. Electron. Commer. Organ..

[3]  Chaomeng James Huang,et al.  Usability of e-government Web-sites for people with disabilities , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[4]  Fatemeh Zahedi,et al.  The Measurement of Web-Customer Satisfaction: An Expectation and Disconfirmation Approach , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[5]  Fotis Kitsios,et al.  New service development in e‐government: identifying critical success factors , 2010 .

[6]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Service Quality: A Measure of Information System Effectiveness , 1995, MIS Q..

[7]  Jorgen P. Bansler Systems Development Research in Scandinavia: Three Theoretical Schools , 1991, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Ingoo Han,et al.  Performance measure of information systems (IS) in evolving computing environments: an empirical investigation , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[9]  Donald F. Norris,et al.  Does managerial orientation matter? The adoption of reinventing government and e‐government at the municipal level * , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[10]  Kim Normann Andersen,et al.  Assessment of Website Quality: Scandinavian Web Awards Right on Track? , 2009, EGOV.

[11]  Li Jiang,et al.  Trust and Electronic Government Success: An Empirical Study , 2008, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[12]  M. Moore Creating public value : strategic management in government , 1995 .

[13]  Arthur Hendricks Webmasters, web policies, and academic libraries: a survey , 2007, Libr. Hi Tech.

[14]  David L. Olson,et al.  Public sector information system critical success factors , 2008 .

[15]  Christopher G. Reddick,et al.  Information Resource Managers and E-government Effectiveness: A Survey of Texas State Agencies , 2006, Gov. Inf. Q..

[16]  RaiArun,et al.  Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models , 2002 .

[17]  Yi-Shun Wang,et al.  Assessing eGovernment systems success: A validation of the DeLone and McLean model of information systems success , 2008, Gov. Inf. Q..

[18]  Richard T. Vidgen,et al.  Measuring Web site quality improvements: a case study of the forum on strategic management knowledge exchange , 2003, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[19]  Austin Henderson,et al.  Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction , 2002, UBIQ.

[20]  Victor R. Prybutok,et al.  Evaluating leadership, IT quality, and net benefits in an e-government environment , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[21]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Measuring information systems success: models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[22]  Timo Saarinen,et al.  An expanded instrument for evaluating information system success , 1996, Inf. Manag..

[23]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Peter B. Seddon A Respecification and Extension of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[25]  Yannis Bakos,et al.  The emerging role of electronic marketplaces on the Internet , 1998, CACM.

[26]  Peter B. Seddon,et al.  A Partial Test and Development of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success , 1994, ICIS.

[27]  James N. Danziger,et al.  Computers and Politics: High Technology in American Local Governments , 1982 .

[28]  J. Ignacio Criado,et al.  E‐government in practice , 2003 .

[29]  K. Lyytinen,et al.  Research on information systems development in Scandinavia—unity in plurality , 1998 .

[30]  Peter B. Seddon,et al.  A Partial Test and Development of Delone and Mclean's Model of IS Success , 1996, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[31]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[32]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Computers: planning for people , 1968 .

[33]  Z. Irani,et al.  Transforming government: people, process, and policy , 2013 .

[34]  Jyoti Choudrie,et al.  Evaluating global e-government sites: A view using web diagnostics tools , 2004 .

[35]  M. Kamal,et al.  An exploratory study on the role of intermediaries in delivering public services in Madinah City: Case of Saudi Arabia , 2010 .

[36]  Leo Lentz,et al.  Scenario evaluation of municipal Web sites: Development and use of an expert-focused evaluation tool , 2006, Gov. Inf. Q..

[37]  E. P. Michael Strategy and the Internet. , 2001 .

[38]  Shirley Ann Becker,et al.  E-government usability for older adults , 2005, CACM.

[39]  広瀬 克哉,et al.  Computers and Politics--High Technology in American Local Governments/James N.Danziger,William H.Dutton,Rob Kling,Kenneth L.Kraemer(1982) , 1984 .

[40]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Measuring Information Systems Service Quality: Concerns for a Complete Canvas , 1997, MIS Q..

[41]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..

[42]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  AIMQ: a methodology for information quality assessment , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[43]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[44]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction. Second Edition , 2007 .

[45]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction , 2002 .

[46]  Leo Pipino,et al.  The Assessment of Website Quality , 2000, IQ.

[47]  William Golden,et al.  Understanding Net Benefits: A Citizen-Based Perspective on eGovernment Success , 2009, ICIS.

[48]  Pieter van Brakel,et al.  Task analysis of the webmaster: results of an empirical study , 2000, Aslib Proc..

[49]  France Bélanger,et al.  The utilization of e‐government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors * , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[50]  Arun Rai,et al.  Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[51]  Efthimios Tambouris,et al.  A framework for evaluating web sites of public authorities , 2008, Aslib Proc..