Robust Beam Selection Based on Water Equivalent Thickness Analysis in Passive Scattering Carbon-Ion Radiotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer

Simple Summary Anatomical variations may distort the carbon-ion beam, leading to dose degradation during treatment. Thus, a robust-beam arrangement is important for patients with pancreatic cancer with carbon-ion radiotherapy. Our study aimed to investigate the angular dependency of water equivalent thickness (WET) variation for pancreatic cancer and to evaluate the robustness of accumulated doses with WET-based beam configurations. We found that posterior oblique beams in the supine position and anteroposterior beams in the prone position were the most robust to WET changes, and the robustness of the accumulated dose was significantly improved by using WET-based beam configurations. The findings may provide a reference for robust beam selection in clinical practice. Abstract Carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) is one of the most effective radiotherapeutic modalities. This study aimed to select robust-beam configurations (BC) by water equivalent thickness (WET) analysis in passive CIRT for pancreatic cancer. The study analyzed 110 computed tomography (CT) images and 600 dose distributions of eight patients with pancreatic cancer. The robustness in the beam range was evaluated using both planning and daily CT images, and two robust BCs for the rotating gantry and fixed port were selected. The planned, daily, and accumulated doses were calculated and compared after bone matching (BM) and tumor matching (TM). The dose-volume parameters for the target and organs at risk (OARs) were evaluated. Posterior oblique beams (120–240°) in the supine position and anteroposterior beams (0° and 180°) in the prone position were the most robust to WET changes. The mean CTV V95% reductions with TM were −3.8% and −5.2% with the BC for gantry and the BC for fixed ports, respectively. Despite ensuring robustness, the dose to the OARs increased slightly with WET-based BCs but remained below the dose constraint. The robustness of dose distribution can be improved by BCs that are robust to ΔWET. Robust BC with TM improves the accuracy of passive CIRT for pancreatic cancer.

[1]  C. Paganelli,et al.  The role of multiple anatomical scenarios in plan optimization for carbon ion radiotherapy of pancreatic cancer. , 2022, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[2]  Hajime Fujii,et al.  Robust treatment planning in scanned carbon-ion radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer: Clinical verification using in-room computed tomography images , 2022, Frontiers in Oncology.

[3]  Jingfang Zhao,et al.  Adaptive carbon ion radiotherapy for locally advanced non‐small cell lung cancer: Organ‐sparing potential and target coverage , 2022, Medical physics.

[4]  T. Ohno,et al.  An adaptive planning strategy in carbon ion therapy of pancreatic cancer involving beam angle selection , 2022, Physics and imaging in radiation oncology.

[5]  T. Ohno,et al.  Robust Angle Selection in Particle Therapy , 2021, Frontiers in Oncology.

[6]  T. Nakano,et al.  Adaptive planning based on single beam optimization in passive scattering carbon ion radiotherapy for patients with pancreatic cancer , 2021, Radiation oncology.

[7]  M. Alber,et al.  Biologically consistent dose accumulation using daily patient imaging , 2021, Radiation oncology.

[8]  T. Ohno,et al.  Determination of Deformable Image Registration Algorithms for Accumulating Dose in Carbon-ion Radiotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer , 2021, AntiCancer Research.

[9]  T. Nakano,et al.  Robustness of daily dose for each beam angle and accumulated dose for inter-fractional anatomical changes in passive carbon-ion radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer: bone matching versus tumor matching. , 2021, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[10]  Zuofeng Li,et al.  A Beam-Angle-Selection Method to Improve Inter-Fraction Motion Robustness for Lung Tumor Irradiation With Passive Proton Scattering , 2020, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[11]  T. Nakano,et al.  Dose assessment for patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer receiving passive scattering carbon-ion radiotherapy using daily computed tomographic images: A prospective study. , 2020, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[12]  G. Sharp,et al.  Beam angle optimization using angular dependency of range variation assessed via water equivalent path length (WEPL) calculation for head and neck proton therapy. , 2019, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[13]  F. Valvo,et al.  Preoperative chemotherapy and carbon ions therapy for treatment of resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a prospective, phase II, multicentre, single-arm study , 2019, BMC Cancer.

[14]  H. Katoh,et al.  Comparison between bone matching and marker matching for evaluation of intra- and inter-fractional changes in accumulated dose of carbon ion radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. , 2019, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[15]  Tatsuya Ohno,et al.  Multi-institutional Study of Carbon-ion Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Japan Carbon-ion Radiation Oncology Study Group (J-CROS) Study 1403 Pancreas. , 2018, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  K. Herfarth,et al.  Significance of intra-fractional motion for pancreatic patients treated with charged particles , 2018, Radiation oncology.

[17]  S. Combs,et al.  Planning strategies for inter-fractional robustness in pancreatic patients treated with scanned carbon therapy , 2017, Radiation oncology.

[18]  A. Lomax,et al.  Impact of beam angle choice on pencil beam scanning breath-hold proton therapy for lung lesions , 2017, Acta oncologica.

[19]  Uwe Oelfke,et al.  Worst case optimization for interfractional motion mitigation in carbon ion therapy of pancreatic cancer , 2016, Radiation Oncology.

[20]  Y. Shioyama,et al.  Multi-institutional Study of Carbon Ion Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Japan Carbon Ion Radiation Oncology Study Group (J-CROS) Study 1403 , 2016 .

[21]  Shinichiro Mori,et al.  Comparison of carbon-ion passive and scanning irradiation for pancreatic cancer. , 2016, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[22]  Arjan Bel,et al.  The impact of interfractional anatomical changes on the accumulated dose in carbon ion therapy of pancreatic cancer patients. , 2016, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[23]  Hiroshi Honda,et al.  Carbon Ion Radiation Therapy With Concurrent Gemcitabine for Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer. , 2016, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[24]  Li Liao,et al.  Motion-robust intensity-modulated proton therapy for distal esophageal cancer. , 2016, Medical physics.

[25]  R. Mohan,et al.  Perturbation of water‐equivalent thickness as a surrogate for respiratory motion in proton therapy , 2016, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[26]  J. Debus,et al.  Optimization of carbon ion and proton treatment plans using the raster-scanning technique for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer , 2015, Radiation oncology.

[27]  L. Muren,et al.  A method for selection of beam angles robust to intra-fractional motion in proton therapy of lung cancer , 2014, Acta oncologica.

[28]  Arjan Bel,et al.  Interfractional position variation of pancreatic tumors quantified using intratumoral fiducial markers and daily cone beam computed tomography. , 2013, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[29]  O. Yokosuka,et al.  Different effects of carbon ion beams and X-rays on clonogenic survival and DNA repair in human pancreatic cancer stem-like cells. , 2012, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[30]  Wei Liu,et al.  Uncertainty incorporated beam angle optimization for IMPT treatment planning. , 2012, Medical physics.

[31]  X Allen Li,et al.  Characterization and management of interfractional anatomic changes for pancreatic cancer radiotherapy. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[32]  H. Katoh,et al.  Carbon Ion Radiotherapy at the Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center: New Facility Set-up , 2011, Cancers.

[33]  J. Petersen,et al.  Comparison of optimized single and multifield irradiation plans of antiproton, proton and carbon ion beams. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[34]  George T. Y. Chen,et al.  Effects of interfractional anatomical changes on water-equivalent pathlength in charged-particle radiotherapy of lung cancer. , 2009, Journal of radiation research.

[35]  S. Mori,et al.  Impact of intrafractional bowel gas movement on carbon ion beam dose distribution in pancreatic radiotherapy. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[36]  S Minohara,et al.  Biophysical characteristics of HIMAC clinical irradiation system for heavy-ion radiation therapy. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[37]  S. Mori,et al.  Effect of patient positioning on carbon-ion therapy planned dose distribution to pancreatic tumors and organs at risk. , 2017, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.