Measuring long-term performance of a manufacturing firm using the Analytic Network Process (ANP) approach

This paper provides a multicriteria performance measurement model to measure a manufacturing firm's performance in terms of areas of success, which can be defined as critical areas in generating revenues and controlling costs in the operations of a manufacturing firm. In developing the performance measurement model, the Analytic Network Process (ANP) approach is used. The ANP approach, which is the general form of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) methodology, is recommended when independence among different elements of a system assumption is violated. In a manufacturing system, the system's attributes are interrelated. Furthermore, the relative importance of these attributes with respect to each other and their contribution to the overall performance are affected by the competitive strategies applied by the manufacturing firms. The performance evaluation model developed here incorporates the competitive strategies and interdependence between the system attributes in its hierarchical structure and achieves a more realistic and accurate representation of the firm's long-term performance.

[1]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Justifying strategic alliances and partnering: a prerequisite for virtual enterprising , 1997 .

[2]  Alfred J. Nanni,et al.  The New Performance Challenge: Measuring Operations for World-Class Competition , 1990 .

[3]  Rambabu Kodali,et al.  Justification of just‐in‐time manufacturing systems for Indian industries , 1998 .

[4]  Charles H. Falkner,et al.  Multi-Attribute Decision Models in the Justification of CIM Systems , 1990 .

[5]  James S. Noble,et al.  The changing basis of performance measurement , 1996 .

[6]  Amiya K. Chakravarty,et al.  Strategic acquisition of new manufacturing technology: a review and research framework , 1992 .

[7]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Multi-factor performance measure model with an application to Fortune 500 companies , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Sujatha Perera,et al.  Customer-focused manufacturing strategy and the use of operations-based non-financial performance measures: A research note , 1997 .

[9]  E. James Flynn,et al.  World‐class manufacturing project: overview and selected results , 1997 .

[10]  Mark A. Vonderembse,et al.  Manufacturing technology and strategy formulation: keys to enhancing competitiveness and improving performance , 1999 .

[11]  Andrea Rangone,et al.  An analytical hierarchy process framework for comparing the overall performance of manufacturing departments , 1996 .

[12]  Sev V. Nagalingam,et al.  A methodology to select optimal system components for computer integrated manufacturing by evaluating synergy , 1998 .

[13]  S. K. Banerjee Developing manufacturing management strategies: Influence of technology and other issues , 2000 .

[14]  Reuven R. Levary,et al.  An analytic hierarchy process based simulation model for entry mode decision regarding foreign direct investment , 1999 .

[15]  Stephen F. Weber A Modified Analytic Hierarchy Process for Automated Manufacturing Decisions , 1993 .

[16]  E. James Flynn,et al.  World class manufacturing: an investigation of Hayes and Wheelwright's foundation , 1999 .

[17]  Ling X. Li An analysis of sources of competitiveness and performance of Chinese manufacturers , 2000 .

[18]  Stanley E. Fawcett,et al.  Benchmarking manufacturing practice using the product life cycle , 1999 .

[19]  Luis E. Quezada,et al.  A methodology for formulating a business strategy in manufacturing firms , 1999 .

[20]  Brian H. Maskell,et al.  Performance Measurement for World Class Manufacturing: A Model for American Companies , 1991 .

[21]  G Kozmetsky,et al.  Comparative Performance of Global Semiconductor Companies , 1998 .

[22]  Roger N. Wabalickis Justification of FMS with the analytic hierarchy process , 1988 .

[23]  Jaideep Motwani,et al.  Performance measurements in worldclass operations: A strategic model , 1995 .

[24]  Lawrence C. Leung,et al.  A Multi-Attribute Product Life-Cycle Approach to Replacement Decisions: An Application of Saaty's System-With-Feedback Method , 1993 .

[25]  Paul Melis Thinking with models: Mathematical models in the physical, biological and social sciences: Thomas L. SAATY and Joyce M. ALEXANDER Volume 2 in: International Series in Modern Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Pergamon, Oxford, 1981, xi + 181 pages, £15.90 , 1982 .

[26]  Kelvin F. Cross,et al.  The “SMART” way to define and sustain success , 1988 .

[27]  Bill Lee,et al.  Accounting, strategy and AMT investment , 1998 .

[28]  Z. Babic,et al.  Ranking of enterprises based on multicriterial analysis , 1998 .

[29]  Heeseok Lee,et al.  DEVELOPING A BUSINESS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM: AN ANALYTIC HIERARCHICAL MODEL , 1995 .

[30]  Thomas J. Crowe,et al.  An integrated dynamic performance measurement system for improving manufacturing competitiveness , 1997 .

[31]  Paul R. Kleindorfer,et al.  Integrating manufacturing strategy and technology choice , 1990 .

[32]  J. L. Stimpert World Class Manufacturing: The Next Decade , 1997 .

[33]  James H. Lambert,et al.  A Methodology for , 2000 .

[34]  M. Badri,et al.  Operations Strategy, Environmental Uncertainty and Performance: A Path Analytic Model of Industries in Developing Countries , 2000 .

[35]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[36]  Christian N. Madu,et al.  A strategic decision model for the selection of advanced technology , 1994 .

[37]  Gregory P. White A survey and taxonomy of strategy‐related performance measures for manufacturing , 1996 .

[38]  M. F. Duffy,et al.  Standardization vs globalization: a new perspective of brand strategies , 1998 .

[39]  P. Swamidass,et al.  Explaining manufacturing technology use, firm size and performance using a multidimensional view of technology , 1998 .